Research Article
An Enhanced Differential Evolution Algorithm Based on Multiple Mutation Strategies
Table 3
Performance comparison between EDE and other three DEs over 30 independent runs for the 16 test functions at , where “” means that EDE wins in functions, ties in functions, and loses in functions, compared with its competitors.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
† indicates that EDE is better than its competitor. ‡ means that EDE is worse than its competitor. ≈ means that the performance of the corresponding algorithm is even with that of EDE. Bold entities mean the best results. |