Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging / 2017 / Article / Tab 3 / Clinical Study
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three-Dimensional Positron Emission Mammography versus Whole Body Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Table 3 Diagnostic concordance of 3D-PEM and WBPET.
Full analysis set Total WBPET + WBPET − 3D-PEM + 228 4 3D-PEM − 15 157 243 161 404 Concordance rate of positive diagnosis: 228/243 = 93.8% (95% CI: 90.6%–97.1%) Concordance rate of negative diagnosis: 157/161 = 97.5% (95% CI: 94.8%–100.0%) Overall diagnostic concordance: 385/404 = 95.3% (95% CI: 93.1%–97.5%) Perprotocol set Total WBPET + WBPET − 3D-PEM + 228 3 3D-PEM − 11 157 239 160 399 Concordance rate of positive diagnosis: 228/239 = 95.4% (95% CI: 92.5%–98.3%) Concordance rate of negative diagnosis: 157/160 = 98.1% (95% CI: 95.7%–100.0%) Overall diagnostic concordance: 385/399 = 96.5% (95% CI: 94.6%–98.4%)
CI: confidential interval.