Research Article
Comparative Analysis of Mass Spectral Similarity Measures on Peak Alignment for Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry
Table 3
F1 score and AUC of each peak alignment method for Data II.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mean (%); standard error (%); the cut-off rank; the rank for the two-step partial and part correlations; the distance measure E, Mx, Mh, and C stand for Euclidean, Maximum, Manhattan, and Canberra distances, respectively; the cut-off similarity score. the weight factor of the mixture similarity score; The numbers in bold and italic indicate the maximum for each of the peak alignment methods. |