Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study

<div>Plots of <svg height="12.0621pt" id="M74" style="vertical-align:-3.2957pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.7664 43.562 12.0621" width="43.562pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M631 18C609 24 585 35 559 65C534 91 514 117 478 169C448 214 406 281 389 313C462 346 516 399 516 485C516 545 490 590 449 616C412 641 363 650 290 650H42V622C120 615 128 612 128 527V125C128 40 120 34 38 28V0H300V28C221 34 212 40 212 125V284H244C295 284 312 272 329 244C359 195 395 133 430 84C475 19 516 -3 592 -7C603 -8 615 -8 627 -8L631 18ZM212 316V563C212 591 215 602 223 607C231 613 248 617 277 617C352 617 423 577 423 469C423 415 407 375 368 345C343 324 310 316 260 316H212Z" id="g121-80"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="621" vert-adv-y="621"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,8.203,0)"><path d="M861 0V28C774 35 771 41 768 147L759 509C756 612 762 614 851 622V650H681L449 149L221 650H57V622C148 613 153 609 144 479L130 271C123 166 117 123 111 88C104 46 85 34 26 28V0H259V28C192 35 169 42 167 90C166 130 166 173 170 256L185 541H187L411 7H431L675 555H679L683 147C683 41 680 35 598 28V0H861Z" id="g121-75"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="891" vert-adv-y="891"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,19.786,0)"><path d="M409 504C401 567 396 607 392 642C354 654 312 665 266 665C137 665 60 583 60 487C60 374 161 325 225 290C300 250 355 215 355 141C355 68 311 21 235 21C131 21 86 122 71 183L41 176C48 128 61 42 68 21C78 16 93 8 118 0C142 -7 175 -15 216 -15C349 -15 438 69 438 174C438 287 344 333 265 374C186 414 138 449 138 522C138 576 172 631 249 631C336 631 363 562 380 499L409 504Z" id="g121-81"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="474" vert-adv-y="474"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,25.792,0)"><path d="M517 162C503 123 484 88 467 68C445 42 417 34 341 34C291 34 256 34 237 47C219 59 213 81 213 128V317H308C395 317 402 311 415 240H444V431H415C403 364 398 356 307 356H213V584C213 613 215 616 246 616H322C394 616 421 609 435 587C448 566 458 544 467 502L496 506C493 557 488 625 488 650H42V622C120 616 128 612 128 523V125C128 43 120 35 29 28V0H511C520 31 540 125 546 158L517 162Z" id="g121-67"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="568" vert-adv-y="568"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,33.3,3.132)"><path d="M185 344V453C137 433 92 421 41 413V386C100 378 104 375 104 310V106C104 41 97 35 33 30V0H268V30C190 35 185 41 185 107V283C206 340 240 371 267 371C282 371 296 364 310 351C316 344 325 343 336 348C357 357 369 378 369 399C369 424 345 451 310 451C262 451 219 397 187 344H185Z" id="g58-112"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="380" vert-adv-y="380"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,36.649,3.132)"><path d="M384 109C349 76 310 59 268 59C197 59 123 113 120 245C240 248 367 259 384 262C403 266 407 275 407 296C407 376 338 451 254 451H253C201 451 148 425 105 378C65 334 39 272 39 203C39 88 112 -12 235 -12C266 -12 339 5 402 84L384 109ZM230 411C285 411 319 365 319 313C319 298 313 293 294 293C236 291 180 290 125 290C141 370 185 411 230 411Z" id="g58-99"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="434" vert-adv-y="434"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,40.562,3.132)"><path d="M244 0V30C178 35 170 41 170 107V710C136 697 72 680 18 675V647C83 642 89 639 89 572V107C89 43 80 35 16 30V0H244Z" id="g58-106"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="260" vert-adv-y="260"></glyph.data></g></svg> as a function of surface density (g/cm<sup>2</sup>) for all low-energy filter materials.</div>

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study

Figure 4