Research Article
Prediction of Pathological Subjects Using Genetic Algorithms
Table 6
Results of the KM clustering for all tibial rotation types.
| KM | ā | Cluster 1 | Percent (%) | Cluster 2 | Percent (%) | Cluster 3 | Percent (%) | Total | Percent (%) |
| RTER | Type 1 | 0 | - | 2 | 5.13 | 37 | 94.87 | 39 | 100.00 | Type 2 | 42 | 10.74 | 207 | 52.94 | 142 | 36.32 | 391 | 100.00 | Type 3 | 4 | 7.41 | 43 | 79.63 | 7 | 12.96 | 54 | 100.00 |
| RTIR | Type 1 | 0 | - | 1 | 3.03 | 32 | 96.97 | 33 | 100.00 | Type 2 | 36 | 8.51 | 263 | 62.18 | 124 | 29.31 | 423 | 100.00 | Type 3 | 2 | 7.14 | 23 | 82.14 | 3 | 10.72 | 28 | 100.00 |
| LTER | Type 1 | 1 | 2.70 | 1 | 2.70 | 35 | 94.60 | 37 | 100.00 | Type 2 | 36 | 10.08 | 242 | 67.79 | 79 | 22.13 | 357 | 100.00 | Type 3 | 2 | 2.22 | 67 | 74.45 | 21 | 23.33 | 90 | 100.00 |
| LTIR | Type 1 | 1 | 1.96 | 3 | 5.88 | 47 | 92.16 | 51 | 100.00 | Type 2 | 36 | 8.70 | 251 | 60.63 | 127 | 30.67 | 414 | 100.00 | Type 3 | 0 | - | 19 | 100.00 | 0 | - | 19 | 100.00 |
|
|