Conference Paper
Critical Analysis of Electromagnetic Hyperthermia Randomized Trials: Dubious Effect and Multiple Biases
Table 4
Analysis of impact of biases in Jones et al. [
12] clinical trial.
| Factor | Value | Possible CLR gain |
| Preselection of “heatable” patients | 11% | +10% | Preselection of RT-resistant patients | 36% | +10% | RT dose bias | 10% | +50%–100% | Median age | −7 years | Unpredictable gain | Tumor size | Unknown | +30%–50% [5, 7–9] | Total weight | | >60% |
|
|