About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Cardiovascular Psychiatry and Neurology
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 383086, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/383086
Hypothesis

Do Neural Cells Communicate with Endothelial Cells via Secretory Exosomes and Microvesicles?

Department of Psychiatry, UIC Psychiatric Institute MC912, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1601 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

Received 28 April 2009; Accepted 15 June 2009

Academic Editor: Hari Manev

Copyright © 2009 Neil R. Smalheiser. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Neurons, glial, cells, and brain tumor cells tissues release small vesicles (secretory exosomes and microvesicles), which may represent a novel mechanism by which neuronal activity could influence angiogenesis within the embryonic and mature brain. If CNS-derived vesicles can enter the bloodstream as well, they may communicate with endothelial cells in the peripheral circulation and with cells concerned with immune surveillance.

1. Introduction

About a year and a half ago, I reviewed evidence that cells within the central nervous system may transfer vesicles containing RNAs and proteins among themselves in a novel type of cell-cell communication [1]. That paper emphasized the possible role of secretory exosomes as a mechanism providing dynamic activity-dependent transfer of molecules across synapses, corresponding to the morphological appearance of “synaptic spinules” which had been long noted by neuroanatomists. However, there are numerous additional examples in the nervous system of transfer of molecules by vesicles moving freely from cell to cell or by cytoplasmic “fingers” intruding directly from one cell into another. For example, astrocytes can provide neuroprotective HSP70 to neurons via exosomes [2], and Schwann cells can provide polyribosomes to the axons that they ensheath [3]. In this brief hypothesis paper, I point out the possibility that central nervous system-(CNS-) derived vesicles may potentially interact with endothelial cells within the brain, and that they may potentially find their way to the bloodstream, where they could interact with endothelial cells and with cells of the immune system.

Secretory exosomes are formed by a specific process of invagination that occurs within endosomes, resulting in the formation of multivesicular bodies [4], or on the cell surface, resulting in budding-out from lipid raft regions of the plasma membrane [5]. Microvesicles are little fragments that are shed or pinched-off from the plasma membrane. Microvesicles are generally thought to be larger than exosomes, but their features and biogenesis may not be entirely distinct [6], and there may be additional types of vesicles that cannot be easily classified at present [7]. Exosomes and microvesicles have been shown to be shed in a regulated fashion by many cell types in culture, including neurons [8] and astrocytes [9]; they have cell-adhesion molecules on their surface which allow them to bind specifically to certain target cell types and to be internalized (e.g., [9, 10]).

In several cases, the internalized mRNAs have been shown to be translated, suggesting that they provide a form of gene transfer to the target cells [911]. Studies of endothelial cells have shown that exosomes and/or microvesicles can alter their gene expression and activate thrombogenicity, apoptosis, and angiogenesis [1115].

2. Do CNS-Derived Vesicles Interact with Endothelial Cells within the Brain?

Secretory exosomes have been detected within the cerebrospinal fluid both in the embryonic and mature brain [16, 17], and neuron-enriched microRNAs have been detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as well [18]. This suggests that neural cells do release vesicles into the extracellular space in vivo. Vascularization and neurogenesis proceed concurrently within the developing brain [19, 20]; both involve similar events such as cell migration and differentiation, and both respond to some of the same patterning cues, growth factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor), and so forth. Endothelial cells interact with neurons and glial cells to form a so-called functional “neurovascular unit” [21], and these interactions are necessary in order for endothelial cells to express tight junctions that underlie the blood-brain barrier [22]. Transfer of vesicles is potentially one way in which neural cells may interact with endothelial cells during embryogenesis. Moreover, new growth of blood vessels occurs in the mature brain and can be stimulated in response to neuronal activity (e.g., environmental enrichment [23]), another arena in which neural-derived cues interact with endothelial cells. Finally, Skog et al. (2008) have shown that glioblastoma-derived microvesicles can stimulate angiogenesis of brain capillary endothelial cells in vitro, a process that would be expected to support tumor growth in vivo [11].

3. Can CNS-Derived Vesicles Reach the Bloodstream?

Blood plasma or serum is an abundant source of microRNAs and mRNAs, which appear to be contained within secretory exosomes and/or microvesicles (e.g., [2433]). Many different normal as well as tumor cell types contribute vesicles to the bloodstream. Placental-derived microRNAs have been shown to provide a biomarker of pregnancy [24], whereas vesicles bearing tumor-specific antigens have been shown to express microRNA profiles related to the tumor cells from which they derive (e.g., [25]). Acetaminophen overdose, which damages the liver as well as other organs, results in elevated levels of the liver-specific microRNA mir-122 [33].

To date, no evidence has been published demonstrating that vesicles shed by CNS neurons or glial cells can enter the bloodstream. (Glioblastoma cells have been reported to shed vesicles into the blood [11], but their relation to nearby blood vessels may be aberrant and not representative of normal glial cells.) However, acetaminophen overdose causes elevated levels of numerous microRNAs in the blood that are generally thought to be brain-enriched [33]. This was interpreted by the authors as likely due to neural damage produced by the drug. Moreover, Dr. Samuil Umansky, Chief Scientific Officer of Xenomics, Inc., presented unpublished data at the Cambridge Healthtech Institute conference on “microRNA in Human Disease and Development” in Boston, MA, in March 2009, showing that microRNAs characteristics of brain expression were detectable in human blood and urine. Levels of these microRNAs were elevated in individuals poststroke in a time-dependent manner and were elevated in individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer disease, though it was not examined whether the microRNAs were contained within vesicles.

What mechanisms might permit CNS-derived vesicles to reach the bloodstream? The blood-brain barrier is thought to prevent movement of large molecules into and out of the brain, and it is unlikely that vesicles would be actively transported across capillaries. However, the blood-brain barrier appears gradually during gestation [34] and so exosomes may be free to communicate with the blood at developmental stages. In the mature brain, it is conceivable that clearance of the cerebrospinal fluid into the blood may permit exit of intact vesicles. As well, the circumventricular regions of the brain appear to be devoid of a blood-brain barrier (including the pineal gland, area postrema, choroid plexus, subfornical organ, supraoptic crest, median eminence, and posterior pituitary) [35]. Furthermore, exit of vesicles may be expected to occur under pathological conditions in which the blood-brain barrier is compromised, for example, following trauma, cell death, or inflammation.

4. Conclusion

There is a growing appreciation that secretory exosomes, microvesicles, and possibly other types of cell-derived vesicles comprise a physiological channel for cell-cell communication, both among neighboring cells and within the bloodstream. Neurons and glial cells in the brain also appear to shed vesicles that potentially may contribute to trophic interactions and synaptic plasticity [1]. CNS-derived secretory exosomes and/or microvesicles have the potential to interact with endothelial cells during developmental stages and during angiogenesis within the mature brain. These interactions should have functional significance, insofar as neurogenesis and angiogenesis are, in part, coordinated responses both in the developing and mature brain [20, 36, 37].

Recent studies also raise the possibility that CNS-derived vesicles may enter the bloodstream and interact with endothelial cells in the peripheral circulation. This would represent a novel communication channel between the nervous system and the cardiovascular system. Circulating vesicles also appear to have an important role in immune surveillance and activation [7]. Perhaps future issues of Cardiovascular Psychiatry and Neurology will contain articles that provide evidence for this channel and that explore the meaning of its messages.

References

  1. N. R. Smalheiser, “Exosomal transfer of proteins and RNAs at synapses in the nervous system,” Biology Direct, vol. 2, article 35, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  2. A. R. Taylor, M. B. Robinson, D. J. Gifondorwa, M. Tytell, and C. E. Milligan, “Regulation of heat shock protein 70 release in astrocytes: role of signaling kinases,” Developmental Neurobiology, vol. 67, no. 13, pp. 1815–1829, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. F. A. Court, W. T. Hendriks, H. D. MacGillavry, J. Alvarez, and J. van Minnen, “Schwann cell to axon transfer of ribosomes: toward a novel understanding of the role of glia in the nervous system,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 43, pp. 11024–11029, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  4. G. van Niel, I. Porto-Carreiro, S. Simoes, and G. Raposo, “Exosomes: a common pathway for a specialized function,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  5. Y. Fang, N. Wu, X. Gan, W. Yan, J. C. Morrell, and S. J. Gould, “Higher-order oligomerization targets plasma membrane proteins and HIV gag to exosomes,” PLoS Biology, vol. 5, no. 6, p. e158, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. E. Cocucci, G. Racchetti, and J. Meldolesi, “Shedding microvesicles: artefacts no more,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 43–51, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  7. C. Théry, M. Ostrowski, and E. Segura, “Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 9, pp. 581–593, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  8. J. Faure, G. Lachenal, M. Court, et al., “Exosomes are released by cultured cortical neurones,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 642–648, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. J. Ratajczak, K. Miekus, M. Kucia, et al., “Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery,” Leukemia, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 847–856, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. H. Valadi, K. Ekström, A. Bossios, M. Sjöstrand, J. J. Lee, and J. O. Lötvall, “Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 654–659, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. J. Skog, T. Würdinger, S. van Rijn, et al., “Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1470–1476, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. A. Aharon, T. Tamari, and B. Brenner, “Monocyte-derived microparticles and exosomes induce procoagulant and apoptotic effects on endothelial cells,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 878–885, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. H. Gambim, A. de Oliveira do Carmo, L. Marti, S. Veríssimo-Filho, L. R. Lopes, and M. Janiszewski, “Platelet-derived exosomes induce endothelial cell apoptosis through peroxynitrite generation: experimental evidence for a novel mechanism of septic vascular dysfunction,” Critical Care, vol. 11, no. 5, article R107, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  14. K. Al-Nedawi, J. Szemraj, and C. S. Cierniewski, “Mast cell-derived exosomes activate endothelial cells to secrete plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1744–1749, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. L. Burnier, P. Fontana, B. R. Kwak, and A. Angelillo-Scherrer , “Cell-derived microparticles in haemostasis and vascular medicine,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 439–451, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. I. Bachy, R. Kozyraki, and M. Wassef, “The particles of the embryonic cerebrospinal fluid: how could they influence brain development?” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 75, no. 2–4, pp. 289–294, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. L. J. Vella, D. L. Greenwood, R. Cappai, J.-P. Scheerlinck, and A. F. Hill, “Enrichment of prion protein in exosomes derived from ovine cerebral spinal fluid,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 124, no. 3-4, pp. 385–393, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  18. J. P. Cogswell, J. Ward, I. A. Taylor, et al., “Identification of miRNA changes in Alzheimer's disease brain and CSF yields putative biomarkers and insights into disease pathways,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 27–41, 2008.
  19. A. Vasudevan, J. E. Long, J. E. Crandall, J. L. Rubenstein, and P. G. Bhide, “Compartment-specific transcription factors orchestrate angiogenesis gradients in the embryonic brain,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 429–439, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  20. A. Javaherian and A. Kriegstein, “A stem cell niche for intermediate progenitor cells of the embryonic cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 19, supplement 1, pp. i70–i77, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  21. S. Guo and E. H. Lo, “Dysfunctional cell-cell signaling in the neurovascular unit as a paradigm for central nervous system disease,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 3, supplement 1, pp. S4–S7, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  22. W. Risau, S. Esser, and B. Engelhardt, “Differentiation of blood-brain barrier endothelial cells,” Pathologie Biologie, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 171–175, 1998.
  23. J. Ekstrand, J. Hellsten, and A. Tingström, “Environmental enrichment, exercise and corticosterone affect endothelial cell proliferation in adult rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 442, no. 3, pp. 203–207, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  24. S. S. Chim, T. K. Shing, E. C. Hung, et al., “Detection and characterization of placental microRNAs in maternal plasma,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 482–490, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  25. P. S. Mitchell, R. K. Parkin, E. M. Kroh, et al., “Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 30, pp. 10513–10518, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  26. C. H. Lawrie, S. Gal, H. M. Dunlop, et al., “Detection of elevated levels of tumour-associated microRNAs in serum of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 672–675, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  27. X. Chen, Y. Ba, L. Ma, et al., “Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases,” Cell Research, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 997–1006, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  28. S. Gilad, E. Meiri, Y. Yogev, et al., “Serum microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 9, p. e3148, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  29. K. E. Resnick, H. Alder, J. P. Hagan, D. L. Richardson, C. M. Croce, and D. E. Cohn, “The detection of differentially expressed microRNAs from the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a novel real-time PCR platform,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 55–59, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  30. M. P. Hunter, N. Ismail, X. Zhang, et al., “Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 11, p. e3694, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  31. D. B. Jackson, “Serum-based microRNAs: are we blinded by potential?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 1, p. E5, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  32. E. K. Ng, W. W. Chong, H. Jin, et al., “Differential expression of microRNAs in plasma of colorectal cancer patients: a potential marker for colorectal cancer screening,” Gut.
  33. K. Wang, S. Zhang, B. Marzolf , et al., “Circulating microRNAs, potential biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 4402–4407, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  34. R. E. Watson, J. M. DeSesso, M. E. Hurtt, and G. D. Cappon, “Postnatal growth and morphological development of the brain: a species comparison,” Birth Defects Research Part B, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 471–484, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  35. A. K. Johnson and P. M. Gross, “Sensory circumventricular organs and brain homeostatic pathways,” FASEB Journal, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 678–686, 1993.
  36. A. Louissaint Jr., S. Rao, C. Leventhal, and S. A. Goldman, “Coordinated interaction of neurogenesis and angiogenesis in the adult songbird brain,” Neuron, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 945–960, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. K. Barami, “Relationship of neural stem cells with their vascular niche: implications in the malignant progression of gliomas,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1193–1197, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed