About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Case Reports in Medicine
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 401359, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/401359
Case Report

Combined Awake Craniotomy with Endoscopic Port Surgery for Resection of a Deep-Seated Temporal Lobe Glioma: A Case Report

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Presbyterian, Suite B-400, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
2Capital Insititute for Neurosciences, Two Capital Way, Suite 456, Pennington, NJ 08534, USA

Received 24 December 2012; Accepted 13 March 2013

Academic Editor: Aaron S. Dumont

Copyright © 2013 Lance Bodily et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The authors describe the combination of awake craniotomy and minimally invasive endoscopic port surgery to resect a high-grade glioma located near eloquent structures of the temporal lobe. Combined minimally invasive techniques such as these may facilitate deep tumor resection within eloquent regions of the brain, allowing minimum white matter dissection. Technical aspects of this procedure, a case outcome involving this technique, and the direction of further investigations for the utility of these techniques are discussed.

1. Introduction

Awake craniotomy with cortical mapping has served as the gold standard for functional preservation in brain tumor surgery since its introduction over half a century ago [1]. For the resection of tumors near the motor cortex or language pathway areas, this technique can help maximize the volume of tumor removal, while minimizing the risk of iatrogenic injury [24].

For deep-seated brain tumors, resection using a minimally invasive cylindrical retractor has the potential to minimize damage to the surrounding white matter incurred as a result of the surgical channel into the tumor. This approach, initially championed by Kelly [57], has been modified into an even less invasive endoscopic port surgery in more recent years. Endoscopic port surgery (EPS) has been described for the removal of both intraventricular and intraparenchymal tumors [811].

In this paper, the authors describe the combination of awake craniotomy with electrophysiological brain mapping and EPS to resect a glioblastoma of the dominant temporal lobe. The case is an example of a deep-seated, eloquent tumor for which the combination of the two techniques seemed intuitive in order to facilitate a favorable outcome.

2. Case Report

2.1. Patient Presentation

A 63-year-old, right-handed man presented with a 6-month history of gait deterioration, requiring a walker. For the 3-4 weeks prior to presentation, he had also experienced a new onset of memory difficulties and subtle trouble with word finding, as well as mild headaches and declining vision. Of note, the patient had a history of spinal cerebellar atrophy (SCA). The patient’s neurologic exam was remarkable for mild dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, and a positive Romberg sign, in addition to subtle fluent dysphasia and memory dysfunction.

An MRI scan revealed a left temporal lobe mass measuring 3.5 cm × 2 cm abutting the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle (Figure 1). Notable T2 signal prolongation was observed, extending from the ventricle to more anterior and superior portions of the temporal lobe. Mass effect was present, with mild effacement of the ventricle and minimal midline shift. Radiological signs secondary to the SCA were also observed, including cerebellar atrophy with enlargement of the foramina of Luschka bilaterally, as well as a fourth ventricular enlargement.

fig1
Figure 1: Preoperative and postoperative images. (a) Preresection T1 axial MRI with contrast showing a temporal lesion with an estimated 5.0 cubic centimeter volume. (b) Immediate postresection T1 axial MRI with contrast showing a slight amount of residual enhancement at the anteromedial margin of the resection cavity. (Yellow arrow indicates residual tumor area not present in (c)). (c) The corresponding noncontrast enhanced T1 MRI image taken at the same time demonstrates that the posteromedial and lateral hyperintensities are in fact blood products and postoperative change rather than gross residual tumor. A 93.3% volumetric resection was achieved.

A craniotomy for tumor resection was recommended to the patient in order to achieve a tissue diagnosis, alleviate neurologic symptoms, and extend survival given the presumptive diagnosis of high grade glioma.

2.2. Operation and Operative Course

The surgical technique of the authors is generally to use a twilight-awake-twilight model of anesthesia for these cases. The patient is fully off sedation for the entirety of the intradural portion of the case during which time the patient undergoes cortical mapping followed by continuous interaction with the neurophysiology team including reading flashcards, performing recall exercises, and answering simple questions. In this particular case, a temporal craniotomy was performed in the standard fashion centered over the middle temporal gyrus. Frameless image guidance was used to guide the placement of the bone flap, which was approximately 3 cm in diameter. Cortical mapping of the exposed temporal lobe did not reveal any changes in speech functions. The tumor was cannulated through the middle temporal gyrus using a previously described method [8] (Figure 2). Resection through the endoscopic port was relatively uneventful, except for two instances of fluency changes that occurred during tumor resection. Both were easily reversed by adjustment of the port trajectory. An aggressive resection was achieved. Pathological examination was consistent with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

fig2
Figure 2: (a) View of the endoscopic port with dilator insertion and (b) surgical view through the endoscopic port.

Postoperative MRI scan demonstrated a 93.3% volumetric resection of the tumor, with minimal residual tumor noted in the anteroinferior margin of the tumor bed (Figure 1). Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with the patient being discharged from the hospital on day 3.

At a one week postoperative followup, the patient was observed to have slight horizontal nystagmus that was noted postoperatively. He reported that his vision seemed to be improving. The patient did slur his speech on occasion; however, this was consistent with his baseline speech preoperatively. No new impairments of language or cognition were noted secondary to the surgery. The patient was undergoing speech and physical therapy and had been referred for radiation therapy and chemotherapy due to his GBM diagnosis.

After 7 months, the patient had an MRI showing multifocal enhancement within the dominant hemisphere. MR spectroscopy was suggestive of multifocal tumor progression. The patient was subsequently treated with two cycles of avastin. At the 9-month followup, the patient has been noted to have improved T2 and FLAIR images consistent with the avastin effect. On the neurological exam, the patient was mildly dysarthric as had been noted prior to surgical intervention. The patient continued to demonstrate mild abnormalities with word finding but could recall 3/3 words in 5 minutes when given categorical clues. The patient had no other new motor, sensory, or cognitive defects noted on exam.

3. Discussion

Removal of brain tumors within eloquent brain regions can result in iatrogenic motor deficits, speech disorders, and complex cognitive deficits [2, 3]. However, for some tumors, including high grade gliomas, the extent of tumor removal is highly correlated with patient survival, pushing the surgeon to remove as much tumor as possible [2]. Awake craniotomy with cortical mapping can facilitate maximal tumor removal and help avoid iatrogenic injury in such cases [2, 12].

Numerous publications have described successful awake craniotomy protocols [13, 14] and retrospective results of successful use [2]. A recent prospective study examined 79 cases of awake craniotomy for supratentorial tumors, citing a 75% recovery from deficits versus an 8.9% worsening of symptoms postoperatively with 89.9% patient satisfaction and 1.3% mortality [15].

Of the factors portending good functional outcome in the removal of high grade gliomas in the temporal lobe using awake craniotomy, the most significant has been reported to be the distance of the surgical margin from the nearest language site [2]. This highlights the importance of minimizing collateral damage in surgical procedures in these critical areas. For deep-seated tumors, mapping of neurologic function can be more difficult than cortical mapping, and white matter dissection can be more extensive. EPS has been previously reported to minimize corticectomy volume and white matter dissection for supratentorial [8, 10] tumors, as well as intraventricular [9] and infratentorial [11] lesions. However, it should be noted that there is a lack of well-powered, controlled trials to investigate whether these new microsurgical techniques portend better outcomes. This paper represents the first known combination of awake craniotomy with EPS in a single operation. For selected cases in eloquent regions of the brain, the combination of these techniques may facilitate safe resection.

4. Conclusion

The authors describe a case of awake craniotomy with cortical mapping followed by resection of an intraparenchymal tumor using an endoscopic port. In rare cases, the combination of these two techniques may be an option to facilitate deep tumor resection within eloquent regions of the brain.

References

  1. J. July, P. Manninen, J. Lai, Z. Yao, and M. Bernstein, “The history of awake craniotomy for brain tumor and its spread into Asia,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 621–624, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. M. Haglund, M. S. Berger, M. Shamseldin et al., “Cortical localization of temporal lobe language sites in patients with gliomas,” Neurosurgery, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 567–576, 1994. View at Scopus
  3. N. Shinoura, R. Yamada, Y. Tabei, K. Saito, Y. Suzuki, and K. Yagi, “Advantages and disadvantages of awake surgery for brain tumours in the primary motor cortex: institutional experience and review of literature,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 218–224, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Szelényi, L. Bello, H. Duffau et al., “Intraoperative electrical stimulation in awake craniotomy: methodological aspects of current practice,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. E7.1–E7.8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. D. Abernathey, D. H. Davis, and P. J. Kelly, “Treatment of colloid cysts of the third ventricle by stereotaxic microsurgical laser craniotomy,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 525–529, 1989. View at Scopus
  6. P. J. Kelly, “Computer assisted volumetric stereotactic resection of superficial and deep seated intra-axial brain mass lesions,” Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplement, vol. 52, pp. 26–29, 1991. View at Scopus
  7. A. Morita, P. J. Kelly, A. L. Rhoton, and B. M. Stein, “Resection of intraventricular tumors via a computer-assisted volumetric stereotactic approach,” Neurosurgery, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 920–927, 1993. View at Scopus
  8. A. B. Kassam, J. A. Engh, A. H. Mintz, and D. M. Prevedello, “Completely endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors: clinical article,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 116–123, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. A. Engh, L. D. Lunsford, D. V. Amin et al., “Stereotactically guided endoscopic port surgery for intraventricular tumor and colloid cyst resection,” Neurosurgery, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. ons198–ons204, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. C. Fernandez-Miranda, J. A. Engh, S. K. Pathak et al., “High-definition fiber tracking guidance for intraparenchymal endoscopic port surgery,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 990–999, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. G. Ochalski, J. C. Fernandez-Miranda, D. M. Prevedello, I. F. Pollack, and J. A. Engh, “Endoscopic port surgery for resection of lesions of the cerebellar peduncles: technical note,” Neurosurgery, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1444–1450, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. L. Sahjpaul, “Awake craniotomy: controversies, indications and techniques in the surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy,” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. S55–S63, 2000. View at Scopus
  13. V. Bonhomme, C. Franssen, and P. Hansa, “Awake craniotomy,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 906–912, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Carrabba, L. Venkatraghavan, and M. Bernstein, “Day surgery awake craniotomy for removing brain tumours: technical note describing a simple protocol,” Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 208–210, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. C. M. Pereira, K. M. Oliveira, G. L. L'Abbate, R. Sugai, J. A. Ferreira, and L. A. da Motta, “Outcome of fully awake craniotomy for lesions near the eloquent cortex: analysis of a prospective surgical series of 79 supratentorial primary brain tumors with long follow-up,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 151, no. 10, pp. 1215–1230, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus