- About this Journal
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Aims and Scope
- Article Processing Charges
- Articles in Press
- Author Guidelines
- Bibliographic Information
- Citations to this Journal
- Contact Information
- Editorial Board
- Editorial Workflow
- Free eTOC Alerts
- Publication Ethics
- Submit a Manuscript
- Subscription Information
- Table of Contents
Case Reports in Neurological Medicine
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 581920, 4 pages
An Unusual Case of Bilateral Agenesis of the Cochlear Nerves
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brasilia, DF, Brazil
2Department of Radiology, University of Brasilia, DF, Brazil
Received 16 April 2012; Accepted 26 June 2012
Academic Editors: J. E. Cohen, R. Hashimoto, and J. Lazareff
Copyright © 2012 Vítor Yamashiro Rocha Soares et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Imaging of the cochlea and internal auditory canals are increasingly important nowadays because of the growing number of cochlear implants being performed throughout the world. We report a case of a 4-year-old boy who was born deaf and was being evaluated in our service for possible cochlear implantation. Audiometry disclosed profound bilateral deafness. The magnetic resonance imaging revealed only two nerves in each inner auditory canal: one in the anterior superior quadrant, identified as the facial nerve, and one on the posterior quadrants, representing both the superior and inferior vestibular nerves. The semicircular canals were not seen and the vestibule had dysplastic morphology. The diagnosis was bilateral agenesis of the cochlear nerves and semicircular canals.
Congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has an incidence of approximately 1–3 cases per 1.000 live births . In some of these patients, cochlear implantation is a well-established and safe procedure. For this, the presence of the spiral ganglion cells and the cochlear nerve (CN) is required for the signal transmission from a cochlear implant to the brain. Thereby, the preoperative determination of cochlear anatomy is important because cochlear implantation is contraindicated in patients with cochlear nerve aplasia, hypoplasia, or agenesis and inner ear malformations .
Imaging of the cochlea and internal auditory canal (IAC) is essential for a cochlear implant candidate in order to establish cochlear duct permeability and the presence of cochlear nerve in the IAC as well as for choosing the side to be implanted . There are few published studies about radiologic images of patients with sensorineural hearing loss in the literature [2, 3]. The joint use of the computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) supplies information on the internal auditory canal thickness, presence of the cochlear, vestibular, and facial nerves, and inner ear malformations .
Using a three-dimensional (3D) constructive interference in steady state (CISS) MRI sequences, the vestibulocochlear and facial nerves can be thoroughly evaluated. Both nerves have similar cisternal and canalicular courses. They both emerge from the lateral aspect of the lower border of the pons and traverse the cerebellopontine angle cistern at an oblique angle. Next, the nerves cross the inner auditory canal (IAC) in its entire length . Within the internal auditory canal, the vestibulocochlear nerve splits into three parts (cochlear, superior vestibular, and inferior vestibular). These three vestibulocochlear nerve branches, along with the facial nerve, have a characteristic appearance on sagittal oblique 3D CISS cross-sectional images (Figure 1).
The knowledge is limited about etiology of congenital deafness. The radiologic images have become an important diagnostic tool in this regard. The purpose of this paper is to present a case of a 4-year-old boy congenitally deaf who was found to have bilateral agenesis of the cochlea nerve during preoperative workup for cochlear implantation.
2. Case Report
A 4-year-old boy congenitally deaf came from another state for evaluation at the Division of Cochlear Implantation of Brasilia University Medical School Hospital. He had the diagnosis of profound deafness since he was 5 months old, and he started using an external hearing device since then without any practical benefit.
He was born by cesarean section with normal gestation age and normal birth weight. There was no history of familial deafness, and there was no consanguinity between the parents. He had no additional congenital malformations, and he had normal neuropsychomotor development except for the profound bilateral deafness. Adenotonsillectomy and bilateral ventilation tubes placement had been performed in the past.
Audiometry disclosed profound bilateral deafness. The use of the external device improved performance in 500 Hz (15 db in the left ear and 20 db in the right) only. Transient and distortion product evoked otoacoustic emissions were absent on both ears. Brainstem-evoked auditory potentials were also absent on both sides.
The MRI revealed only two nerves in each IAC, one in the anterior superior quadrant, identified as the facial nerve, and one on the posterior quadrants, representing both the superior and inferior vestibular nerves (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). The semicircular canals were not seen and the vestibule had dysplastic morphology (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). The diagnosis was bilateral agenesis of the cochlear nerves and semicircular canals.
Agenesis of the auditory nerve is estimated to be responsible for 1% of congenital deafness cases . It is characterized by the absence of the auditory nerve in the IAC. Its diagnosis is of extreme importance in preoperative evaluation of a patient who is candidate for cochlear implant. The width of the internal auditory canal and the thickness of the acusticofacial nerve have implications for surgical programming. As the CT has some limitations of definition of neuroanatomical structures, the analysis of the membranous labyrinth and the internal auditory canal must be performed by MRI . MRI cross-sectional images in the sagittal oblique plane are ideal for the detection of cochlear nerve aplasia, hypoplasia, or agenesis because they allow the identification of the facial, cochlear, and vestibular nerves. The aplasia of the cochlear nerve is seen by the absence of the nerve in the anterior superior quadrant. The vestibular nerves may be identified separately or as one only nerve. The latter case is considered an anatomic variant (Figures 1 and 2) .
Shelton et al.  report a probable association between IAC thickness on CT with the hipoplasia/agenesia of acusticofacial nerve. However, recent studies show that normal IAC and labyrinth can be present in the agenesis of CN. Thereby, IAC thickness is not a landmark trustworthy to indicate the integrity of the CN [2, 5].
A radiological classification of the hypoplasia and aplasia of the vestibulocochlear nerve (VCN) is suggested. It is based on the affected branch and presence of labyrinth dysplasia. Type I: the VCN is affected with presence of IAC stenosis and a dysplastic labyrinth may be present. Type IIa: alteration of the cochlear branch with labyrinth dysplasia (from minor dysplasia to common cavity). Type IIb: normal labyrinth associated to damage of the cochlear branch. Type III: illness of the initial branch of vestibular nerve . The hypoplasia or isolated aplasia of the vestibular branch with presence of the branch to the cochlea has not been described up to now. The present patient was a Type IIb with semicircular canals agenesis and vestibular dysplasia.
There are reports of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with cochlear malformations and hypoplasia of CN. The performances of these patients are not as good compared to patients treated with a normal anatomy of the cochlea [8, 9]. An auditory brainstem implant is another treatment option for patients with inner ear abnormalities in the presence of cochlear nuclei. In young children, the experience is very limited. This is due to the nature of surgery, as it requires brain surgery to implant the device. The effectiveness of the device is also reduced compared to CI. Recipients only have an awareness of sound and beat. They will not be able to hear melodies. Colletti et al.  treated three children with an auditory brainstem implantation device. All three were diagnosed with cochlear nerve aplasia. Six months after the implantation, these patients were able to identify different sounds and distinguish sound frequencies.
Congenital bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia is a rare entity. The image studies became important tools in the diagnosis of these lesions. CT and MRI can evaluate possible malformations of the labyrinth and vestibulocochlear nerve. In the presence of aplasia of the CN, the cochlear implant is formally contraindicated. Studies with brainstern implantation have showed promising results.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
- K. R. White, “Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions,” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 203–217, 1994.
- M. Carner, L. Colletti, R. Shannon et al., “Imaging in 28 children with cochlear nerve aplasia,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 458–461, 2009.
- J. P. Westerhof, J. Rademaker, B. P. Weber, and H. Becker, “Congenital malformations of the inner ear and the vestibulocochlear nerve in children with sensorineural hearing loss: evaluation with CT and MRI,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 719–726, 2001.
- S. Sheth, B. F. Branstetter, and E. J. Escott, “Appearance of normal cranial nerves on steady-state free precession MR images,” Radiographics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1045–1055, 2009.
- O. F. Adunka, P. A. Roush, H. F. B. Teagle et al., “Internal auditory canal morphology in children with cochlear nerve deficiency,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 793–801, 2006.
- J. W. Casselman, F. E. Offeciers, P. J. Govaerts et al., “Aplasia and hypoplasia of the vestibulocochlear nerve: diagnosis with MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 202, no. 3, pp. 773–781, 1997.
- A. Borges and J. Casselman, “Imaging the cranial nerves: part I: methodology, infectious and inflammatory, traumatic and congenital lesions,” European Radiology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2112–2125, 2007.
- C. Shelton, W. M. Luxford, L. L. Tonokawa, W. W. M. Lo, and W. F. House, “The narrow internal auditory canal in children: a contraindication to cochlear implants,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 227–231, 1989.
- P. J. Govaerts, J. Casselman, K. Daemers, C. De Beukelaer, M. Yperman, and G. De Ceulaer, “Cochlear implants in aplasia and hipoplasia of the cochleovestibular nerve,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 887–891, 2003.
- V. Colletti, M. Carner, F. Fiorino et al., “Hearing restoration with auditory brainstem implant in three children with cochlear nerve aplasia,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 682–693, 2002.