Abstract
A subpubic cartilaginous cyst is a rare mass lesion derived from the pubic symphysis, which can cause acute or subacute urinary retention. We report a case of a subpubic cartilaginous cyst in a 62-year-old woman that caused lower abdominal pain and subacute urinary retention, requiring surgical resection. On physical examination, a hard, flexible, nontender mass, 4 cm in diameter, was palpable along the lower border of the pubic bone, extending to the perineum. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a clearly distinct (3.8 cm × 3.8 cm × 7.2 cm) mass on the midpelvic side of the pelvis, centered on the pubic joint. We proceeded with en bloc resection of the mass, including a resection margin of 1 cm on either side. The bony defect was fixed with a locking plate. On pathological assessment, the mass was diagnosed as a subpubic cartilaginous cyst arising from the cartilage of the pubic symphysis. No tumor recurrence was identified over a 4-year follow-up. Based on our experience, we propose that en bloc resection of the mass, including a wider resection centered on the pubic symphysis, with internal fixation, is a possible treatment for a subpubic cartilaginous cystic mass lesion.
1. Introduction
A subpubic cartilaginous cyst is a rare soft-tissue mass lesion derived from the pubic symphysis, which can be either asymptomatic or cause discomfort, pain, and urinary retention. Here, we describe a case of a subpubic cartilaginous cyst causing subacute urinary retention, which required surgical treatment. We also provide a review of available literature on this clinical condition.
2. Case Presentation
A 62-year-old woman presented with a chief complaint of lower abdominal pain and urinary retention. Her relevant past medical history included three pregnancies and deliveries, and a hysterectomy and removal of ovaries, bilaterally, due to endometriosis at the age of 32 years, with subsequent menopause. Lower abdominal pain and urinary obstruction appeared 5 months prior to hospitalization. At that time, the patient visited another hospital and was treated with catheterization. Following the initial catheterization, she was unable to void and was recatheterized. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a mass between the pubis and the urethra, and the patient was referred to our hospital for assessment and treatment.
On physical examination, the hard and flexible tumor was palpable, about 4 cm in length, extending from the lower side of the pubic bone to the perineum, but with no tenderness. On gynecological examination, the external urethral meatus was deviated posteriorly, but with no deformation. A needle biopsy was performed, with the histological diagnosis being difficult to judge owing to the few cell components available in the biopsy specimen. Urinary cytology was assessed as class II. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging revealed a clearly distinct midpelvic mass lesion (3.8 cm × 3.8 cm × 7.2 cm), centered on the pubic symphysis. T1-weighted imaging revealed well-defined borders of the lesion, with a low signal intensity inside. On the short-TI inversion recovery (STIR) sequence, the inside of the mass appeared mottled, with mixed low and high intensity signals. After intravenous administration of gadolinium, the mass lesion showed contrast enhancement in the marginal region, but with no contrast enhancement in its internal compartment. A urethral catheter was visible on the posterior aspect of the mass lesion, which had been placed for treatment of the acute urinary retention disorder (Figure 1).
(a)
(b)
Based on consultation with urology and gynecology, the mass was deemed to be nonmalignant, arising for the pubic symphysis. As the mass was causing urinary symptoms, a decision was made in consultation with the patient for surgical resection.
Surgical resection was performed in the crushed stone position. The anterior surface of the pubis was exposed over an arc of about 15 cm, the subcutaneous tissue was expanded, and the pubic symphysis exposed as a whole. The soft tissues adhering to the pubic bone, such as ligaments, were peeled off, at both the anterior and posterior surfaces, and the mass was confirmed. The mass was excised en bloc, including the pubic symphysis, using an osteotomy at 1 cm to the left and right of the pubic symphysis. After the 2 cm en bloc resection, the remnants of the pubic bone separated further, to about 4 cm (Figure 2). About 3 cm of the tricortical bone was collected from the iliac bone and inserted between the pubic bones to close the gap, and it was fixed with a 7-hole locking plate and 6 screws.
Pathological findings of the mass revealed a cystoid tissue organization. The connective tissue of the wall of the cyst was continuous with the fibrous cartilage of the interpubic disc. Most of the yellowish tissue inside the tumor and around the interpubic disc consisted of denatured acidophilic and ineffective tissues, with poor cellular components, as well as cartilage tissues identified using S100 protein immunohistochemistry. The yellowish tissue was confirmed to be the degenerated fibrocartilage tissue, with no evidence of malignancy (Figure 3).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
The urethral catheter was removed two weeks after surgery, with the patient being able to excrete urine without residual volume or incontinence. The plate with anchored fixation was loosened and removed about 3 months after the surgery. At the 4-year follow-up, urinary function remained normal, with no evidence of recurrence of the mass on MR imaging (Figure 4).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
3. Discussion
A subpubic cartilaginous cyst is a rare mass derived from the pubic symphysis. The first two cases were reported by Alguacil-Garcia and Littman in 1996 [1], with 18 cases having subsequently been reported [2–16]. A summary of these cases is provided in Table 1. Among these cases, patients ranged in age from 54 to 75 years (2 males and 16 females), with all female patients being multipara. Previous histological assessment of these masses reported the presence of the degenerated fibrocartilage in the central part of the mass, which is consistent with our findings. The pubic symphysis is an anatomically hemiarthrotic joint, composed of a fibrocartilaginous interpubic disc sandwiched between thin hyaline cartilages [17], which is consistent with the fibrocartilaginous nature of the subpubic mass.
Among the 18 cases previously reported, the mass presented as a painless lump in 6 cases, with the other female patients reporting a feeling of discomfort in the vulva and pain with activities of daily living. Urinary symptoms were reported in 5 of these 18 cases, consisting of incomplete bladder emptying, with difficult micturition in 4 cases and acute urinary retention in the other case. In our case, the patient experienced subacute urinary retention requiring indwelling of a urinary catheter. As in the case presented by Ghareeb et al. [15], in our patient, the mass was large and was growing on the posterior aspect of the pubic symphysis, physically occluding the urethra.
As subpubic masses are rare, there is no standard treatment. From the available literature, 7 asymptomatic cases were followed up by observation, with no evidence of a change in the size of the mass among 5 patients over a follow-up period of 2 to 4 years. The 11 cases with urinary tract symptoms, as in our case, underwent surgical resection of the tumor, with no recurrence over a follow-up period of 1 to 3 years. Hoogendoorn et al. [8] reported pubic symphysis dehiscence as a complication of resection of the subpubic cartilaginous cyst. Internal fixation is recommended in cases of pubic symphysis dehiscence if conservative therapy, including reduction in activity and use of a pelvic belt, does not improve symptoms. Due to loosening, we removed the fixation plate early in the postoperative course, at 3 months after surgery, without complication and achieving good bone fusion. Based on our experience, we propose that en bloc resection of the mass, with a wider resection centered on the pubic symphysis, with internal fixation, is a possible treatment for a subpubic cartilaginous cystic mass.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.