About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Case Reports in Surgery
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 709835, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/709835
Case Report

Unilateral Giant Varicocele Mimicking Inguinal Hernia Resulting from Portosystemic Shunt without Evidence of Portal Hypertension: An Unusual Case Report

Al Jahra Hospital, Ministry of Health, State of Kuwait, P.O. Box 40206, 01753 Safat, Kuwait

Received 5 January 2013; Accepted 5 February 2013

Academic Editors: A. Cho, A. K. Karam, Y. Rino, and G. Sandblom

Copyright © 2013 Muhammed Zahir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. T. Jenkins and P. J. O'Dwyer, “Inguinal hernias,” British Medical Journal, vol. 336, no. 7638, pp. 269–272, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. M. Pinggera, R. Herwig, L. Pallwein et al., “Isolated right-sided varicocele as a salvage pathway for portal hypertension,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 740–742, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Yardy, A. Rafique, I. Sellers, L. Berman, and N. Bullock, “A varicocoele mimicking a hydrocoele in a man with portal hypertension: a case report,” Journal of Medical Case Reports, vol. 2, article 363, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Lee, S. Binsaleh, K. Lo, and K. Jarvi, “Varicoceles: the diagnostic dilemma,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 143–146, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. R. Bhosale, M. Patnana, C. Viswanathan, and J. Szklaruk, “The inguinal canal: anatomy and imaging features of common and uncommon masses,” Radiographics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 819–913, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Bittles and E. K. Hoffer, “Gonadal vein fmbolization: treatment of varicocele and Pelvic Congestion syndrome,” Seminars in Interventional Radiology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 261–270, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Y. Sze, J. S. Kao, J. K. Frisoli, S. W. McCallum, W. A. Kennedy, and M. K. Razavi, “Persistent and recurrent postsurgical varicoceles: venographic anatomy and treatment with N-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 539–545, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Schulte-Baukloh, J. Kämmer, R. Felfe, B. Stürzebecher, and H. H. Knispel, “Surgery is inadvisable: massive varicocele due to portal hypertension,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 852–854, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus