Giant Perineal Leiomyoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Table 2

Comparative table showing perineal leiomyoma case reports.

	Perineal leiomyoma case reports
Author	Roy et al.	Agostini et al.	Lombana et al.	Brox-Jimenez et al.	Shuch et al.	Bernal-Sprekelsen et al.	Koc et al.	Oliveira-Brito et al.	Our patient
Year	1998	2006	2007	2007	2007	2010	2010	2011	2011
Country	India [11]	Italy [6]	Colombia [3]	Spain [4]	USA [8]	Spain [5]	Turkey [1]	Brazil [2]	USA
Age	47	56	37	48	60	30	47	36	41
Sex	F	F	F	F	F	F	F	F	F
Size	6.0 × 6.0 cm	22.0 × 13.0 cm	10.0 × 8.0 cm	6.0 × 7.0 cm	4.0 × 4.0 × 3.0 cm	7.4 × 5.1 × 5.4 cm	6.5 × 4.0 × 2.3 cm	15.0 × 6.5 × 7.5 cm	24.0 × 12.0 × 8.0 cm
SMA	nd	POS	nd	nd	POS	POS	POS	POS	POS
Desmin	nd	nd	nd	nd	POS	nd	POS	POS	POS
CD 117	nd	nd	nd	nd	nd	nd	NEG	NEG	NEG
CD 34	nd	nd	NEG	nd	nd	nd	NEG	NEG	NEG
S100	nd	nd	nd	nd	nd	nd	NEG	NEG	NEG
Surgery	WE	WE	WE	WE	WE	WE	WE	WE	WE
Margins	R0	R0	R0	R0	R0	R0	R0	R0	R0
Nuclear pleomorphism	NR	NEG	NR	NR	NEG	NR	NR	NEG	NEG
Necrosis	NR	NEG	POS	NEG	NEG	NEG	NR	NEG	NEG
Mitotic activity	<5/10	NEG	NEG	<5/10	NEG	NEG	NEG	NEG	<5/10
Atypia	NEG	NEG	NEG	NEG	NEG	NEG	NEG	NEG	POS
Uterine leiomyoma	Y	Y	NR	Y	Y	NR	NR	NR	Y
Recurrence	NONE	NONE	NR	NONE	NR	NONE	NONE	NR	NONE
Followup	24 m	16 m	NR	16 m	NR	14 m	12 m	NR	24 m

F: female; NEG: negative; POS: positive; nd: not done; NR: not reported; R0: negative margins; WE: wide excision; Y: yes; SMA: smooth muscle actin.