- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 126324, 3 pages
Heart Failure 2012
1The University Hospital of Larissa, P.O. Box 1425, 41110 Larissa, Greece
2A.H.E.P.A University Hospital, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
3Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
4Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
5Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Berlin, Germany
Received 22 November 2012; Accepted 22 November 2012
Copyright © 2012 Gregory Giamouzis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Heart failure has been named “the growing epidemic.” Over the last decade, the annual number of heart failure hospitalizations has almost doubled with approximately 50% of patients being rehospitalized within 6 months of discharge . The complex array of physiologic, psychological, social, and health care delivery issues makes it a challenging chronic disease to manage. Understanding the epidemiology and pathophysiology of the syndrome, identifying the predictors and their strength of association with outcomes, and using the available diagnostic modalities cost-effectively are essential in order to devise effective prevention interventions and implement novel therapeutic approaches to curb this epidemic.
In this special issue, we have invited a few papers that address such issues and explain why despite the emergence of novel therapeutic approaches, that promise life prolongation and hospital length reduction, this patient population will still be needing rehospitalization and will often have a poor prognosis. This special issue is the extension of an effort that was initiated in 2011 with the first heart-failure-focused issue .
In the pathophysiology section, S. M. R. Kazemi-Bajestani et al. describe the opportunities and challenges of targeting the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)/Ang II/Ang1–7 and apelin/APJ pathways as novel therapeutic modalities in heart failure . ACE2 and the apelin/APJ are two important peptide systems which exert diverse effects on the cardiovascular system. Dysregulation of such systems may be involved in the predisposition to cardiovascular diseases whereas enhancing their action may have important therapeutic effects. In the same section, D. Lindner et al. provide a comprehensive review on the protective function of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in CVB3-induced myocarditis . The transcription factor (STAT3) is an important mediator of the inflammatory process, and in this original research the investigators examine the role of STAT3 in viral myocarditis and its possible role in the development to dilated cardiomyopathy.
Considering the high mortality rate and the availability of life-saving therapies like transplantation and left ventricular assist devices, accurate prognosis determination in HF is clinically important. Taking into account the mediocre performance of current established prediction models, such as the Seattle Heart Failure Model [5–7], the work by H. Fukuta et al.  on the prognostic value of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for coronary artery disease sheds light on this extremely important topic.
A shared understanding of medical conditions between patients and their health care providers has been shown to improve self-care and outcomes . In the comorbidity section, we demonstrate how certain comorbid conditions may affect patients’ decision-making capacity and interfere with their ability to comply with treatment requirements, recognize and self-manage disease worsening symptoms. Among others, cognitive impairment is increasingly recognized as a common adverse consequence of HF, whereby phenomena such as microembolism, chronic or intermittent cerebral hypoperfusion, and/or impaired cerebral vessel reactivity may lead to cerebral hypoxia and ischemic brain damage. Cognitive decline in HF is characterized by deficits in one or more cognition domains, including attention, memory, executive function, and psychomotor speed. E. Dardiotis et al. , in a comprehensive review, underscore the importance for healthcare professionals to become familiar with assessment of cognitive performance using standardized screening instruments in their routine evaluations of HF patients.
Another comorbidity gaining increasing attention in HF patients is depression. There are several pathophysiological mechanisms as well as behavioral processes linking depression and HF. Equally important is screening for depression and there are several valid and reliable screening tools to identify patients at greater risk. Consultation should be provided by a multidisciplinary team, consisting of cardiologists, psychiatrists, and hospital or community nurses so as to carefully plan, execute, and evaluate medical intervention and implement lifestyle changes. D. Mastrogiannis et al.  systematically review the existing knowledge regarding current definitions, prognostic implications, pathophysiological mechanisms, and current and future treatment options in patients with depression and HF. Evidence from the literature supports the possibility of a pathophysiological relationship between cognitive impairment, depression, and HF. Yet, very few studies have sought to investigate this relationship. The paper by Z. N. Sohani and Z. Samaan reviews current literature on the association between depression and cognitive impairment in persons with HF and explores possible mechanisms explaining this complex triad .
Heart failure through neurohumoral activation induces alterations of cardiac metabolism, such as insulin resistance, and promotes increased utilization of noncarbohydrate substrates for energy production [13, 14]. Fasting blood ketone bodies as well as fat oxidation have been shown to be increased in this patient population. The result is depletion of myocardial ATP, phosphocreatine, and creatine kinase, leading to decreased efficiency of mechanical work. A direct approach to manipulate cardiac energy metabolism consists in modifying substrate utilization by the failing heart. Trimetazidine, perhexiline, and ranolazine directly inhibit fatty acid oxidation and have been used to increase the ischemic threshold in patients with effort angina. Current research is supporting the concept that shifting the energy substrate preference away from fatty acid metabolism and toward glucose metabolism could be an effective adjunctive treatment in patients with HF. These agents have been shown to improve both glucose metabolism and left ventricular function in diabetic patients with left ventricular dysfunction. In the pharmacotherapy section, we provide a systematic review, in which N. Signoretta et al.  discuss the beneficial therapeutic effects of modulation of cardiac metabolic substrates utilization in patients with HF.
In the advanced heart failure section, we provide a thorough review on the current status of mechanical circulatory support in patients with advanced HF. Management of the advanced HF patients with the numerous comorbidities [16, 17] requires a significant amount of health care resources and is becoming a major public health problem. As therapeutical strategies for HF have been refined, the number of patients suffering from the end-stage disease has expanded dramatically. Although heart transplantation still represents the gold standard therapeutical approach, the shortage of donors universally has made the implantation of mechanical circulatory support devices a well-established management for this disease. The systematic review by K. Spiliopoulos et al. , outlines the current status of mechanical circulatory support in this patient population.
In the chronic follow-up section, we deal with telemonitoring, a novel diagnostic modality that has been suggested to be beneficial for HF patients, targeting optimization of their chronic followup. Telemonitoring is viewed as a means of recording physiological data (such as body weight, heart rate, arterial blood pressure electrocardiogram recordings, and other data) by portable devices and transmitting these data remotely (via a telephone line, a mobile phone, or a computer) to a server where they can be stored, reviewed, and analyzed by the research team. In a systematic review of all randomized clinical trials evaluating telemonitoring in chronic HF, G. Giamouzis et al.  assess whether telemonitoring provides any substantial benefit in this patient population.
We hope that the readers of the journal will find the topics as interesting and important as we did.
John A. Elefteriades
- G. Giamouzis, A. Kalogeropoulos, V. Georgiopoulou et al., “Hospitalization epidemic in patients with heart failure: risk factors, risk prediction, knowledge gaps, and future directions,” Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 54–75, 2011.
- G. Giamouzis, F. Triposkiadis, J. Butler, D. Westermann, and G. Giannakoulas, “Heart failure,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2011, Article ID 159608, 2 pages, 2011.
- S. M. Kazemi-Bajestani, V. B. Patel, W. Wang, and G. Y. Oudit, “Targeting the ACE2 and apelin pathways are novel therapies for heart failure: opportunities and challenges,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 823193, 11 pages, 2012.
- D. Lindner, M. Hilbrandt, K. Marggraf, et al., “Protective function of STAT3 in CVB3-induced myocarditis,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 437623, 11 pages, 2012.
- A. P. Kalogeropoulos, V. V. Georgiopoulou, G. Giamouzis et al., “Utility of the seattle heart failure model in patients with advanced heart failure,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 334–342, 2009.
- G. Giamouzis, A. P. Kalogeropoulos, V. V. Georgiopoulou et al., “Incremental value of renal function in risk prediction with the Seattle Heart Failure Model,” American Heart Journal, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 299–305, 2009.
- S. A. Agha, A. P. Kalogeropoulos, J. Shih et al., “Echocardiography and risk prediction in advanced heart failure: incremental value over clinical markers,” Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 586–592, 2009.
- H. Fukuta, N. Ohte, K. Wakami, T. Goto, T. Tani, and G. Kimura, “Prognostic value of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for coronary artery disease,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 243735, 8 pages, 2012.
- A. S. Malik, G. Giamouzis, V. V. Georgiopoulou et al., “Patient perception versus medical record entry of health-related conditions among patients with heart failure,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 569–572, 2011.
- E. Dardiotis, G. Giamouzis, D. Mastrogiannis, et al., “Cognitive impairment in heart failure,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 595821, 9 pages, 2012.
- D. Mastrogiannis, G. Giamouzis, E. Dardiotis, et al., “Depression in patients with cardiovascular disease,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 794762, 10 pages, 2012.
- Z. N. Sohani and Z. Samaan, “Does depression impact cognitive impairment in patients with heart failure?” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 524325, 9 pages, 2012.
- F. Triposkiadis, G. Giamouzis, and J. Butler, “The importance of managing diabetes correctly to prevent heart failure,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 257–259, 2011.
- F. Triposkiadis, G. Karayannis, G. Giamouzis, J. Skoularigis, G. Louridas, and J. Butler, “The sympathetic nervous system in heart failure. Physiology, pathophysiology, and clinical implications,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 54, no. 19, pp. 1747–1762, 2009.
- N. Signoretta, G. Fragasso, L. Alberti, L. Lauretta, B. De Marchi, and A. Margonato, “Role of pharmacological metabolic modulation in heart failure,” Cardiology Research and Practice. In press.
- G. Giamouzis, J. Butler, and F. Triposkiadis, “Renal function in advanced heart failure,” Congestive Heart Failure, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 180–188, 2011.
- F. Triposkiadis, R. C. Starling, H. Boudoulas, G. Giamouzis, and J. Butler, “The cardiorenal syndrome in heart failure: cardiac? renal? syndrome?” Heart Failure Reviews, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 355–366, 2012.
- K. Spiliopoulos, G. Giamouzis, G. Karayannis, et al., “Current status of mechanical circulatory support: a systematic review,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 574198, 12 pages, 2012.
- G. Giamouzis, D. Mastrogiannis, K. Koutrakis, et al., “Telemonitoring in chronic heart failure: a systematic review,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 410820, 7 pages, 2012.