- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 383181, 6 pages
Diverse Spectrum of Presentation of Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon: A Concise Review of the Literature
1Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901, USA
2Cardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
Received 27 October 2011; Revised 19 February 2012; Accepted 20 February 2012
Academic Editor: Michael S. Wolin
Copyright © 2012 Muhammad A. Chaudhry et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) is a disease entity characterized by slow progression of angiographic contrast in the coronary arteries in the absence of stenosis in the epicardial vessels. CSFP has a diverse presentation from mild chest discomfort to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. It can also have severe morbidity and mortality implications and can significantly hamper the quality of life of those affected. In this paper we present two patients with CSFP highlighting the diverse spectrum of presentation. A concise review of the literature is also provided emphasizing the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic parameters, treatment modalities, and clinical significance of this phenomenon.
1. Case Presentations
1.1. Patient 1
The first case involved a 43-year-old man with a past medical history of hyperlipidemia and hypertension who presented to the hospital with chest pain. The chest pain was described as a pressure-like sensation in the center of his chest, 8/10 in severity, and radiated down his left arm. Upon presentation, vital signs were stable, cardiac biomarkers were within normal limits, and the electrocardiogram (EKG) showed no ST/T-waves changes. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed normal left ventricle function and no wall motion abnormalities. Of note, the patient had a similar presentation and ER course two weeks prior.
Due to the fact that the patient continued to have 8/10 chest pain during his hospital stay, coronary angiogram was ultimately done. The angiogram showed normal coronary arteries without evidence of coronary vasospasm or an existing myocardial bridge. Slow flow, however, was noted in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). An intracoronary adenosine challenge was done and showed normalization of the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) frame count (Figure 1). The patient was given the diagnosis of coronary slow flow phenomenon and started on dipyridamole 50 mg three times a day and discharged home.
On six-month followup, the patient reported that he had been chest-pain-free. Shortly after his six-month followup, the patient ran out of his medicine and again began to experience chest pain. Once the patient was placed back on his dipyridamole, he became chest-pain-free.
1.2. Patient 2
The second case involved a 70-year-old gentleman with a past medical history of squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue six years prior. The patient presented with a single episode of chest pain at rest described as pressure-like and associated with shortness of breath and diaphoresis. Admission EKG revealed T-wave inversion in the anterior leads and a prolonged QT interval (Figure 2). Cardiac enzymes were also noted to be elevated (CKMB 8.3 IU/l and troponin I 1.14 ng/mL). Transthoracic echocardiogram showed normal left ventricular function with no wall motion abnormalities or left ventricular hypertrophy. A diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was made, and the patient was started on the appropriate acute coronary syndrome medications. Left heart catheterization was done the following day and revealed normal coronary arteries with slow flow noted in LAD. An intracoronary adenosine challenge was done that showed normalization of the TIMI frame count (Figure 3). The patient was given the diagnosis of coronary slow flow and started on amlodipine 2.5 mg daily. On 6-month followup, the patient reports that he has been chest-pain-free.
CSFP was first described by Tambe et al. in 1972, and is defined as delayed opacification of coronary vessels during angiography without any evident obstructive disease . Quantitatively, it is measured as increased Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count. TIMI frame count, introduced by Gibson, is a reproducible index of coronary flow and represents the number of cine frames required for contrast to reach a prespecified distal coronary artery landmark. TIMI frame count is further corrected in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) by normalizing for the LAD length. The corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) divides the absolute TIMI frame count in the LAD by 1.7. CSFP is defined as CTFC > 2 standard deviations from normal published range (21 ± 3) .
The presentation of this phenomenon is extremely diverse ranging from stable or unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), and even vague chest discomfort. Yilmaz et al. found in their study that patients with CSFP had higher total cholesterol level (including higher low-density lipoprotein levels), higher body mass index, and a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome . Azzarelli et al. showed in a case series that patients with CSFP often present with recurrent chest pain . New onset intermittent left bundle branch block (LBBB) has also been reported in association with CSFP in a patient presenting with acute coronary syndrome .
The overall incidence of CSFP is 1% among patients who undergo coronary angiography, especially those presenting with acute coronary syndrome . In TIMI-IIIA study, the incidence of CSFP was 4% among patients who presented with unstable angina and had none or insignificant epicardial coronary artery disease .
The pathogenesis of CSFP is still not well understood. There are some typical histopathological features associated with CSFP based on which reduction of luminal diameter and functional obstruction are believed to be the key events in its pathogenesis. Mosseri et al. demonstrated medial hypertrophy, myointimal proliferation, and endothelial degeneration along with changes of myofibrillar degenerative foci with lipofuscin deposits at electron microscopic level . Luminal narrowing was attributed to endothelial swelling and degeneration. Mangieri et al. substantiated these findings in CSFP patients by showing small vessel thickening with associated luminal narrowing, dilated interstitial spaces filled with granular fibrillar material, decreased intracellular glycogen, distorted mitochondrial cristae, and patchy myofibrillar disarray at electron microscopic level . Based on this, it was suggested that fibromuscular hyperplasia and medial hypertrophy with consequent decrease in luminal diameter lead to functional obstruction and CSFP.
The occurrence of CSFP is also believed to be strongly associated with elevated homocysteine levels which cause significant injury and consequent endothelial impairment . Endothelial damage secondary to decreased nitric oxide levels, with elevated levels of nitric oxide synthase inhibitor and asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA) are also considered as chief contributory factors [11, 12]. The basic underlying event is endothelial injury which leads to functional obstruction and disease manifestation.
Aortic pulse pressure and pulsatility index was found to be significantly elevated in patients with CSFP. It is believed that this could possibly be caused by endothelial dysfunction in CSFP. Increased aortic stiffness in CSFP was shown by Tanriverdi et al. in a study of 154 patients which included 81 patients with angiographically proven CSFP and 73 patients with normal coronary flow .
Impaired coronary flow reserve is another important feature in CSFP which is related to increased resting coronary microvascular tone. With increased myocardial oxygen demand, the inability to maximize coronary flow can reflect as persistent and recurrent chest pain in CSFP. In a study by Erdogan et al. which included 20 patients with CSFP and 15 controls, coronary flow reserve was significantly reduced in the CSFP group . This was also shown by Mangieri et al. in a study of twenty-eight patients with CSFP in which 14 patients had coronary slow flow in one vessel and 14 had coronary slow flow in three vessels. After dipyridamole infusion, coronary angiography was done and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan was performed. Interestingly, TIMI frame count decreased after dipyridamole infusion in both groups while SPECT score increased in the first group and was reduced in the second group . This suggests that myocardial perfusion in more extensive CSFP is significantly impaired and reflects the poor coronary flow reserve in these patients. A list of characteristic disease associations of CSFP is outlined in Table 1.
The treatment for CSFP is still a matter of debate and a number of drugs have shown variable benefits. Simvastatin has shown to improve myocardial perfusion in patients with CSFP . The pleiotropic effect, direct endothelial function effect, and the antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory actions of statins appear to be responsible for this improved perfusion . In a study by Fan et al. which included 91 patients with CSFP, significant improvement in coronary flow reserve was shown after treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg daily for eight weeks . This study highlights the importance of statin therapy in treatment of CSFP.
Nebivolol has also shown to be effective at improving endothelial function in patients with CSFP. It controls chest pain, decreases C reactive protein (CRP), and significantly improves coronary flow .
Dipyridamole, which has a vasodilator effect on the coronary microvasculature, is being used as treatment for CSFP as well. In a study where 25 patients with CSFP were administered dipyridamole 75 mg three times a day for one month, coronary flow returned to normal in 70 out of 75 vessels. Typical angina complaints resolved in 17 patients (68%), and decreased in frequency in the remaining 8 patients (32%) . Dipyridamole abolishes functional obstruction in coronary arteries with diameters less than 200 micrometers and is considered far superior in treating CSFP as compared to nitroglycerine .
There is no substantial data regarding the use of conventional calcium L-channel blockers such as amlodipine in patients with CSFP. It was used in the second case as described above because calcium channel blockers are macro- and microvascular vasodilators used for slow flow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In one study regarding clinical and angiographic benefits of the calcium T-channel blocker mibefradil in CSFP patients, results showed reduction of total angina frequency by 56%, prolonged angina episodes > 20 minutes by 74%, and sublingual nitroglycerine consumption by 59% over a 12-month period. Angiographically, 13 out of 18 vessels showing TIMI-2 flow had abolition of the slow flow . Currently, its use is limited due to occurrence of extensive drug interactions by inhibition of the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway .
7. Syndrome X
An important differential to be considered in the diagnosis of CSFP is coronary syndrome X. Over the last few years, a number of important distinguishing features between these two seemingly similar entities have been identified (Table 2). In a study of 49 patients, Atak et al. documented increased QTc dispersion in patients with CSFP, which greatly increases the predisposition of sudden cardiac death due to malignant ventricular arrhythmias . CSFP has also been termed as syndrome Y because of its interesting occurrence in syndrome X patients, after administration of neuropeptide Y .
The major long-term problem in CSFP patients is persistent and recurrent chest pain. One-third of these patients require readmission for an acute exacerbation . In a study of 88 patients with angina and normal coronary arteries over a followup period of 6–11 years, chest pain diminished in 47%, and symptoms were unchanged in 24% or even worse in 29% of patients. However, 81% of patients with documented CSFP at coronary angiography reported chest pain to be similar or even worse than the initial episode .
Resting EKG abnormalities and positive exercise stress tests are more frequent in patients with CSFP. In one study of 53 patients with angina and angiographically normal epicardial coronary arteries and 40% having documented CSFP, 57% of patients had worsening or persistence of symptoms, and nonsignificant resting EKG abnormalities were seen in 27% while exercise-induced functional and perfusion abnormalities occurred in 69% of patients .
Patients with CSFP have a favorable long-term prognosis as reported by Lichtlen et al. in a prospective study of 176 patients with angina and normal coronary arteries. The median followup time period was 12.4 years. The rate of fatal myocardial infarction was found to be 0.05% per year, risk of death from coronary artery disease was 0.09% per year, and the rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction occurrence was 0.18% per year .
The major implications of this disease entity are reflected in the hampering of day-to-day life of CSFP patients with persistent chest pain and multiple hospital admissions. This is highlighted particularly well in the two cases presented here. There is a need for further extensive studies regarding the detailed pathogenesis and newer effective treatment modalities for this unique phenomenon with the potential to ameliorate the poor quality of life of patients with CSFP.
Conflict of Interests
There are no disclaimers or conflict of interests.
Informed consent has been obtained.
- A. A. Tambe, M. A. Demany, H. A. Zimmerman, and E. Mascarenhas, “Angina pectoris and slow flow velocity of dye in coronary arteries—a new angiographic finding,” American Heart Journal, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 1972.
- C. M. Gibson, C. P. Cannon, W. L. Daley et al., “TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow,” Circulation, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 879–888, 1996.
- H. Yilmaz, I. Demir, and Z. Uyar, “Clinical and coronary angiographic characteristics of patients with coronary slow flow,” Acta Cardiologica, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 579–584, 2008.
- S. Azzarelli, C. Grasso, A. R. Galassi, and C. Tamburino, “Coronary slow flow phenomenon: description of three cases evaluated with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy,” Italian Heart Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 341–344, 2005.
- S. Acikel, O. A. Bozkaya, and R. Akdemir, “The relationship between intermittent left bundle-branch block and slow coronary flow in a patient presenting with acute coronary syndrome,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 595–597, 2010.
- S. Singh, S. S. Kothari, and V. K. Bahl, “Coronary slow flow phenomenon: an angiographic curiosity,” Indian Heart Journal, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 613–617, 2004.
- D. J. Diver, J. D. Bier, P. E. Ferreira et al., “Clinical and arteriographic characterization of patients with unstable angina without critical coronary arterial narrowing (from the TIMI-IIIA trial),” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 531–537, 1994.
- M. Mosseri, R. Yarom, M. S. Gotsman, and Y. Hasin, “Histologic evidence for small-vessel coronary artery disease in patients with angina pectoris and patent large coronary arteries,” Circulation, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 964–972, 1986.
- E. Mangieri, G. Macchiarelli, M. Ciavolella et al., “Slow coronary flow: clinical and histopathological features in patients with otherwise normal epicardial coronary arteries,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 375–381, 1996.
- H. Tanriverdi, H. Evrengul, Y. Enli et al., “Effect of homocysteine-induced oxidative stress on endothelial function in coronary slow-flow,” Cardiology, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 313–320, 2007.
- N. Sezgin, I. Barutcu, T. A. Sezgin et al., “Plasma nitric oxide level and its role in slow coronary flow phenomenon,” International Heart Journal, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 373–382, 2005.
- M. T. Selcuk, H. Selcuk, A. Temizhan et al., “Asymmetric dimethylarginine plasma concentrations and L-arginine/asymmetric dimethylarginine ratio in patients with slow coronary flow,” Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 545–551, 2007.
- H. Tanriverdi, H. Evrengul, I. D. Kilic, O. Taskoylu, G. Dogan, and S. Alpsoy, “Aortic pressures, stiffness and left ventricular function in coronary slow flow phenomenon,” Cardiology, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 261–267, 2010.
- J. F. Beltrame, S. B. Limaye, R. D. Wuttke, and J. D. Horowitz, “Coronary hemodynamic and metabolic studies of the coronary slow flow phenomenon,” American Heart Journal, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2003.
- H. Turhan, A. R. Erbay, A. S. Yasar, A. Bicer, H. Sasmaz, and E. Yetkin, “Impaired coronary blood flow in patients with metabolic syndrome: documented by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count method,” American heart journal, vol. 148, no. 5, pp. 789–794, 2004.
- J. E. Sharman, S. Moir, K. M. Kostner, B. Haluska, and T. H. Marwick, “Patients with coronary slow flow phenomenon demonstrate normal myocardial blood flow and arterial wave reflection between acute episodes,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 321–325, 2009.
- M. Turkmen, I. Barutcu, A. M. Esen, O. Karakaya, O. Esen, and Y. Basaran, “Effect of slow coronary flow on P-wave duration and dispersion,” Angiology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 408–412, 2007.
- D. Erdogan, M. Caliskan, H. Gullu, A. T. Sezgin, A. Yildirir, and H. Muderrisoglu, “Coronary flow reserve is impaired in patients with slow coronary flow,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 168–174, 2007.
- E. Mangieri, G. Tanzilli, G. D. Vincentis et al., “Slow coronary flow and stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Different patterns in acute patients,” Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 322–327, 2006.
- M. Cakmak, H. Tanriverdi, N. Cakmak, H. Evrengul, S. Cetemen, and O. Kuru, “Simvastatin may improve myocardial perfusion abnormality in slow coronary flow,” Cardiology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2008.
- J. J. Li, X. Zheng, and J. Li, “Statins may be beneficial for patients with slow coronary flow syndrome due to its anti-inflammatory property,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 333–337, 2007.
- Y. Fan, J. H. Lin, G. Dong, J. Zhu, F. Yin, and S. S. Yang, “The effect of carvedilol on coronary flow reserve in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy,” Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 217–219, 2010.
- S. Tiryakioglu, O. Tiryakioglu, H. Ari, et al., “Effects of nebivolol on endothelial function and exercise parameters in patients with slow coronary flow,” Clinical Medicine: Cardiology, vol. 3, pp. 115–119, 2009.
- N. Kurtoglu, A. Akcay, and I. Dindar, “Usefulness of oral dipyridamole therapy for angiographic slow coronary artery flow,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 777–779, 2001.
- J. F. Beltrame, S. P. Turner, S. L. Leslie, P. Solomon, S. B. Freedman, and J. D. Horowitz, “The angiographic and clinical benefits of mibefradil in the coronary slow flow phenomenon,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 57–62, 2004.
- L. Becquemont, C. Funck-Brentano, and P. Jaillon, “Mibefradil, a potent CYP3A inhibitor, does not alter pravastatin pharmacokinetics,” Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 232–236, 1999.
- R. Atak, H. Turhan, A. T. Sezgin et al., “Effects of slow coronary artery flow on QT interval duration and dispersion,” Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 107–111, 2003.
- J. Kaski, D. Tousoulis, G. Rosano, et al., “Role of neuropeptide Y in the pathogenesis of syndrome X,” European Heart Journal, vol. 13, p. 103, 1992.
- P. K. Goel, S. K. Gupta, A. Agarwal, and A. Kapoor, “Slow coronary flow: a distinct angiographic subgroup in syndrome X,” Angiology, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 507–514, 2001.
- S. Saya, T. A. Hennebry, P. Lozano, R. Lazzara, and E. Schechter, “Coronary slow flow phenomenon and risk for sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 352–355, 2008.
- M. Fineschi, A. Bravi, and T. Gori, “The “slow coronary flow” phenomenon: evidence of preserved coronary flow reserve despite increased resting microvascular resistances,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 358–361, 2008.
- J. F. Beltrame, S. B. Limaye, and J. D. Horowitz, “The coronary slow flow phenomenon—a new coronary microvascular disorder,” Cardiology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 197–202, 2002.
- W. Voelker, U. Euchner, H. Dittmann, and K. R. Karsch, “Long-term clinical course of patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 307–311, 1991.
- M. Ciavolella, A. Avella, S. Bellagamba, E. Mangieri, A. Nigri, and A. Reale, “Angina and normal epicardial coronary arteries: radionuclide features and pathophysiological implications at long-term follow-up,” Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 493–499, 1994.
- P. R. Lichtlen, K. Bargheer, and P. Wenzlaff, “Long-term prognosis of patients with anginalike chest pain and normal coronary angiographic findings,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1013–1018, 1995.