- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 129369, 7 pages
Serum Uric Acid as a Marker of Coronary Calcification in Patients with Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease with Preserved Left Ventricular Pump Function
1Internal Medicine Department, State Medical University, Zaporozhye 69035, Ukraine
2Clinical Pharmacology Department, State Medical University, Zaporozhye 69035, Ukraine
Received 22 January 2013; Revised 14 February 2013; Accepted 27 February 2013
Academic Editor: Frans Leenen
Copyright © 2013 A. E. Berezin and A. A. Kremzer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Objective. To evaluate the interrelation between serum uric acid and artery calcification in asymptomatic coronary artery disease subjects. Design and Methods. 126 subjects with previously documented asymptomatic coronary artery disease were enrolled in the study. Results. Mean value of serum uric acid level was 23.84 mmol/L (95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.75–31.25 mmol/L). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the results showed that serum uric acid levels (odds ratio , 95% CI = 1.20–1.82; ), osteopontin (, 95% CI = 1.12–1.25; ), osteoprotegerin (, 95% CI = 1.20–1.89; ), type 2 diabetes mellitus (, 95% CI = 1.20–1.72; ), and total cholesterol (, 95% CI = 1.10–1.22; ) were factors that independently associated with coronary artery calcification. The Cox models suggested that high quartile of serum uric acid level is very significant in predicting Agatston score index. In conclusion, we suggested that high quartile of serum uric acid level (cutoff point equaled 35.9 mmol/L) was a very significant predictor of coronary calcification examined by Agatston score index in subjects with asymptomatic coronary artery disease.
Hyperuricemia is frequently present in patients with symptomatic heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, arterial hypertension, and atrial fibrillation and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [1–3]. Current evidence suggests that serum uric acid could be a marker of oxidative damage . Serum uric acid is also considered a useful biomarker for mortality and an indicator of a poor prognosis in high-risk patients with several cardiovascular diseases [5–7]. Recently clinical studies have shown that serum uric acid inversely correlates with left ventricular ejection fraction, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen in patients with heart failure . There is a significant association between serum uric acid and circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines among subjects with chronic heart failure . Serum uric acid is often discussed as a risk factor for acute kidney injury, which adversely affects renal blood flow autoregulation, glomerular filtration rate, and promotes inflammation and angiogenesis . However, the principal mechanism that contributes to biological effects of serum uric acid in patients with asymptomatic coronary artery disease without reducing left ventricular pump function is still to be understood. It has been postulated that serum uric acid plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases affecting xanthine oxidase pathway that contributes to the production of active oxygen species generation with deterioration of cells membranes . Reactive oxygen species contribute to vascular oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, which are associated with the risk of atherosclerosis, damages of both cardiomyocytes and vascular endothelium inducing disturbances of myocardial contractility and vasoconstriction also . Indeed, few studies have investigated the association of hyperuricemia with subclinical heart failure and atherosclerosis [12–15]. However, we do not know exactly whether serum uric acid is only a marker rather than a causal factor causing coronary calcification in asymptomatic ischemic heart disease [8, 10].
The aim of the study was to evaluate the interrelation between serum uric acid and coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic coronary artery disease subjects with preserved left ventricular systolic function.
2. Design and Methods
The population of the study was structured retrospectively after determination of coronary artery disease by contrast-enhanced spiral computer tomography angiography in one hundred twenty-six asymptomatic subjects. All subjects gave their written informed consent to participate in the study before enrollment.
The Included criteria are asymptomatic coronary artery disease, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, age more than 18 years, sinus rhythm, and written informed consent for participation in the study.
Excluded criteria are symptomatic chronic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, severe kidney and liver diseases that have ability to independently influence the clinical outcomes, malignancy, unstable angina, Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction within 30 days before study begins, creatinin plasma level above 440 μmol/L, eGFR index <35 mL/min/1.73 m2, brain injury within 3 months before enrollment, body mass index above 30 kg/m2 and less than 15 kg/m2, pulmonary edema, tachyarrhythmia, valvular heart disease, thyrotoxicosis, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, acute infections, surgery, trauma, all ischemic events during the previous 3 months, inflammatory conditions within 1 month, and incidence of neoplasm were ruled out by careful medical history and physical examination before the study began, pregnancy, and an implanted pacemaker.
2.1. Echocardiography Examination
Echocardiography in B-mode was performed on the Recommendation of American Society of Echocardiography on scanner ACUSON (Siemens, Germany) using a transducer with a frequency of 2.5–5 MHz. End-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes were obtained using a two-dimensional reference sector according to Simpson’s method, and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated according to conventional methods .
2.2. Contrast-Enhanced Spiral Computer Tomography Angiography
Coronary vessel wall and plaque’s geometrical and compositional parameters were measured on contrast-enhanced spiral computer tomography (CT) angiography . CT was performed on a “Somatom Volume Zoom” scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with 2 rows of detectors (32 × 2 CT system) during end-expiratory breath hold. After noncontrast localization image acquisition, an injection of a nonionic contrast “Omnipak” (Amersham Health, Ireland) was used to determine optimal coronary arterial image. Images were reconstructed in 0.6 mm axial slices. Coronary artery calcification was quantified by calculating the Agatston’ score index and calcification mass measurement . We determined calcified atherosclerotic plaque, high-density noncalcified plaque (HD-NCP), and low-density noncalcified plaque (LD-NCP). Calcified atherosclerotic plaques (CAP) were classified with attenuation values of 150 HU (Hounsfield units) or greater, as HD-NCP with 30 to 149 HU and as LD-NCP with −100 to +30 HU [19, 20].
2.3. Glomerular Filtration Ratio Estimation
Estimated glomerular filtration ratio (eGFR) was calculated by MDRD formula .
2.4. Blood Sampling
All samples were collected in cooling vacutainer and after that they were immediately centrifuged (4°C for 6.000 × 15 min). After centrifugation serum was coded and stored at −70° in a refrigerator until used.
2.5. Serum Uric Acid Measurement
Serum uric acid level was measured by enzymatic methods  using chemical analyzer Beckman Synchron LX20. Analytical range average for serum uric acid was 0.5–12 mg/dL.
2.6. Osteopontin and Osteoprotegerin Levels Determination
Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin levels were measured by ELISA technique. For both biomarkers examination, Humans Quantikine ELISA Kits (R&G, United Kingdom) were used. All determinations were done by duplicate. The mean intra-assay coefficients of variation were <10% for all cases.
2.7. High-Sensitive C-Reactive Protein Level Determination
High-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level was measured by nephelometric technique and obtained with “AU640 Analyzer” (Olympus Diagnostic Systems Group, Japan).
2.8. Cholesterol Level Measurements
Concentrations of total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoproteins (HDL) cholesterol were determined by Dimension Clinical Chemistry System (Dade Behring Inc., Newark, NJ, USA). The levels of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) cholesterol were calculated by using the formula of Friedewald W. T., Levy R. I., Fredrickson D. S. (1972).
2.9. Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS for Windows v. 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Il, USA, 2011). All values were given as mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) or median and percentiles. An independent group -test was used for comparisons of all interval parameters meeting the criteria of normality and homogeneity of variance. For interval parameters not meeting these criteria, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to make comparisons between variables. Comparisons of categorical variables between groups were performed using the Chi2 test and the Fisher exact test. Osteopontin, osteoprotegerin, serum uric acid, and hs-CRP concentrations were normally distributed (using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), and data was not positively skewed. However, the data was not transformed. The potential factors that may be associated with severity of coronary atherosclerosis and calcification were identified first with the univariant analysis (ANOVA); Cox multivariant analyses were used to identify predicted value of determined factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were configured to establish cutoff points of serum uric acid level that optimally predicted coronary atherosclerosis. A calculated difference of was considered significant.
General characteristics of study patients are presented in Table 1. A group of persons, which were surveyed, were predominantly males (58.7%) at the age of years, with mean HbA1c level equal to 6.8%, with hyperlipidemia, mild-to-moderate increase of hs-CRP, and history of hypertension. Type 2 diabetes mellitus was determined in 36.5% cases. Calcified atherosclerotic plaques were determined in 96% cases; HD-NCP and LD-NCP were found in 31% and 25%, respectively. Numerous coronary arteries with plaques determined were 36.5% (1 vessel), 33.3% (2 vessels), and 20.2% (3 and more vessels). All patients were treated according to current clinical guidelines with diet, lifestyle modification, and drug therapy that included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-2 receptor blockers, aspirin, or other antiaggregants, statins, and metformin if necessary.
Analysis of obtained results has revealed that mean value of serum uric acid level was 23.84 mmol/L (95% CI = 15.75–31.25 mmol/L). Data was distributed in quartiles (Q) as follows: for Q1 mean value of serum uric acid was 12.25 mmol/L (95% CI = 11.31–13.19 mmol/L), for Q2 mean value of serum uric acid was 17.33 mmol/L (95% CI = 16.45–18.22 mmol/L), for Q3 mean value of serum uric acid was 25.29 mmol/L (95% CI = 23.53–27.09 mmol/L), and for Q4 mean value of serum uric acid was 39.27 mmol/L (95% CI = 35.05–43.48 mmol/L). Using the 95th percentile of serum uric acid within normal ranges as 32 mmol/L for male and 36 mmol/L for females, we determined that there are 9 (7.1%) males and 7 (5.6%) females with hyperuricemia in the population observed. We predisposed that low frequencies of hyperuricemia occurring in patient population did not require a contribution depending on sex-adjusted value of serum uric acid concentration for further regression analysis.
Univariant regression analysis suggested that serum uric acid plasma levels were directly related to osteopontin (, ), LD-CAP (, ), Agatston’ score index (, ), type two diabetes mellitus (, ), total cholesterol (, ), osteopontin (, ), coronary artery stenosis of more 50% (, ), eGFR (, ), and creatinine plasma level (, ) and inversely correlated to LVEF (). At the same time, the significant association between serum uric acid with fasting glucose, HbA1c, mean systolic blood pressure, and premature coronary artery disease in family anamnesis and medications for the entire cohort of the patients was not determined.
Generalized regression linear models for two dependent variables which contribute to coronary calcification included coronary artery stenosis of more 50% and Agatston score index and are shown in Table 2. We revealed that three factors, such as type two diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, and osteoprotegerin, can be considered to contribute to coronary artery stenosis severity. However, osteoprotegerin became a factor that associates with Agatston score index. After excluding, in both these models, type two diabetes mellitus as a factor, we suggested that osteoprotegerin, osteopontin, and serum uric acid significantly affected the variable of interest (Agatston score index) only (Table 3).
3.1. Factors Associated with Coronary Artery Calcification
In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the results showed that serum uric acid (odds ratio (OR) = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.20–1.82, and ), osteopontin (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.12–1.25, and ), osteoprotegerin (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.20–1.89, and ), type two diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.20–1.72, and ), and total cholesterol (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.10–1.22, and ) were factors that independently associated with coronary artery calcification (Figure 1). After adjustment for significant predictors, including osteopontin, osteoprotegerin, type two diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, and demographic variables (age, sex) serum uric acid became useful to predict Agatston score index value (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01–1.52, and ).
Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios revealed that high quartile of serum uric acid had been considerable in predicting the value for coronary calcification when compared with other quartiles of serum uric acid (Table 4).
3.2. Effect of Serum Uric Acid Level on the Sensitivity and Specificity of Predicting Models for Coronary Artery Calcification
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the prognostic value of serum uric acid, ROC curve was developed. The Cox models suggested that high quartile serum uric acid level was very significant in predicting Agatston score index (Wald χ2 = 147.83, ). The cutoff point of SUA for this model was 35.9 mmol/L. The sensitivity and specificity of the models were 80.0% and 59.2%, respectively, for predicting coronary artery calcification; area under curve was (Figure 2). When serum uric acid was added to these models as first, second, and third quartiles, it failed to predict Agatston score index (Wald χ2 = 14.28, , Wald χ2 = 16.50, , and Wald χ2 = 21.20, , resp.)
In summary, we suggested that in asymptomatic patients with coronary artery disease, serum uric acid mildly relates to metabolic factor (type two diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, and creatinine), bone-related proteins (osteopontin, osteoprotegerin), proinflammatory proteins (hs-C-reactive protein), left ventricular election fraction, and parameters that are attributed to vascular calcification (Agatston score index and coronary artery stenosis of more 50%). On the other hands, high quartile of serum uric acid associates well with Agatston score index, and after adjustment for type two diabetes mellitus, osteoprotegerin and osteopontin levels became a prognostic factor for coronary calcification. Recent clinical studies have shown that serum uric acid can correlate with vascular remodeling  and hemodynamic profiles  in several patient’s populations. Because oxidative stress and inflammation are common in chronic heart failure beyond loss of left ventricular pump function [25, 26], we support a hypothesis that serum uric acid can contribute to influence of inflammatory activation, metabolic disorders, and calcium deposition in plaques and in vasculature . Nevertheless, in the majority of studies there was a significant interrelationship between hyperuricemia (above 7 mg/dL) and cardiovascular outcomes [28–30]. Besides, recent clinical studies have shown that age and sex were significant effective modulators for the relation of serum uric acid to fatal congestive heart failure and ischemia events, with markedly stronger associations found in younger individuals [31, 32]. Although women and men present different age-related cardiovascular risk patterns, serum uric acid is independently and significantly associated with risk of cardiovascular events. Indeed, the Gubbio study showed a statistically significant contribution of serum uric acid to predict cardiovascular incidence in Italian population sample of 2469 men and women aged 35–74 years, free from major cardiovascular diseases, whereas the statistical contribution to predict coronary artery disease criteria were not significant . Similar findings were true for elderly, postmenopausal women with established symptomatic coronary artery disease [33, 34], while investigators have emphasized that serum uric acid was not associated with mortality from acute, subacute, or chronic forms of coronary disease after adjustment for potential confounding cardiovascular risk factors. We obtained data about high predicted value of serum uric acid beyond obligatory hyperuricemia and vascular calcification in age- and sex-adjusted Cox proportional model. It has been postulated that gender-related cardiovascular disease incidences are associated with kidney function worsening, and serum uric acid elevation can reflect this interrelationship. No significant decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate. plasma level was found in patients which were enrolled in the study. However, taking into consideration that serum uric acid would have a protective antioxidant activity [35, 36] we agreed that serum uric acid was an independent risk factor for coronary calcification, and it was able to preserve predict value in high concentration without several biological markers with defined potential toward vascular remodeling (osteopontin, osteoprotegerin, and type two diabetes mellitus). Theoretically, serum uric acid assessment may be useful in a population of children and adolescents with overweight or obese, as there is an association between the risk of asymptomatic coronary atherosclerosis and the level of uric acid in the blood . Finally, we presumed that the dual paradoxical action of serum uric acid in the pathophysiology of asymptomatic coronary artery disease patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function required further discussions.
In conclusion, we suggested that serum uric acid level in the highest quartile (above 35.9 mmol/L) was very significant in prediction of coronary calcification examined by Agatston score index in comparison with the lowest quartile in asymptomatic coronary artery disease subjects with preserved left ventricular systolic function.
5. Limitations of the Study
This study has some limitations. We believed that a greater cohort would be desirable to improve the power of the study. We also relied on clinical data to rule out infection and other inflammatory diseases before sampling, but we cannot exclude that some patients had unrecognized conditions responsible for the elevated serum uric acid levels observed. We suppose to mean that these limitations might not have a significant influence on study data interpretation.
The study was approved by the local ethics committee of State Medical University, Zaporozhye, Ukraine. Registration number is 25/17-11-2010. The conduct of the study conformed to the declaration of Helsinki.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
- Y. Tian, Y. Chen, B. Deng et al., “Serum uric acid as an index of impaired renal function in congestive heart failure,” Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 2012.
- Q. Y. Zhao, S. B. Yu, H. Huang et al., “Serum uric acid levels correlate with atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic systolic heart failure,” Chinese Medical Journal (English Edition), vol. 125, no. 10, pp. 1708–1712, 2012.
- M. G. Kaya, H. Uyarel, M. Akpek et al., “Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 486–491, 2012.
- L. Tamariz, S. Agarwal, E. Z. Soliman et al., “Association of serum uric acid with incident atrial fibrillation (from the atherosclerosis risk in communities [ARIC] study,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 1272–1276, 2011.
- P. Jeemon and D. Prabhakaran, “Does uric acid qualify as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality?” Clinical Science, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 255–257, 2013.
- I. Gotsman, A. Keren, C. Lotan, and D. R. Zwas, “Changes in uric acid levels and allopurinol use in chronic heart failure: association with improved survival,” Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 694–701, 2012.
- T. Kawai, M. Ohishi, Y. Takeya et al., “Serum uric acid is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality in hypertensive patients,” Hypertension Research, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1087–1092, 2012.
- A. Gluba, A. Bielecka, D. P. Mikhailidis et al., “An update on biomarkers of heart failure in hypertensive patients,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1681–1689, 2012.
- A. A. Ejaz, B. Dass, V. Lingegowda et al., “Effect of uric acid lowering therapy on the prevention of acute kidney injury in cardiovascular surgery,” International Urology and Nephrology, 2012.
- A. Harzand, L. Tamariz, and J. M. Hare, “Uric acid, heart failure survival, and the impact of xanthine oxidase inhibition,” Congestive Heart Failure, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 179–182, 2012.
- P. Puddu, G. M. Puddu, E. Cravero, L. Vizioli, and A. Muscari, “The relationships among hyperuricemia, endothelial dysfunction, and cardiovascular diseases: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications,” Journal of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 235–242, 2012.
- E. Krishnan, A. Hariri, O. Dabbous, and B. J. Pandya, “Hyperuricemia and the echocardiographic measures of myocardial dysfunction,” Congestive Heart Failure, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 138–143, 2012.
- M. Kaufman and M. Guglin, “Uric acid in heart failure: a biomarker or therapeutic target?” Heart Failure Reviews, 2012.
- B. Ky, B. French, W. C. Levy et al., “Multiple biomarkers for risk prediction in chronic heart failure,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 183–190, 2012.
- C. F. Kuo, L. C. See, K. H. Yu, I. J. Chou, M. J. Chiou, and S. F. Luo, “Significance of serum uric acid levels on the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality,” Rheumatology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 127–134, 2013.
- N. B. Schiller, P. M. Shah, M. Crawford et al., “Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American society of echocardiography committee on standards, subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 358–367, 1989.
- D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff et al., “Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young,” Circulation, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 586–606, 2008.
- A. S. Agatston, W. R. Janowitz, R. J. Gibbons, J. Maddahi, L. Wexler, and R. White, “Ultrafast computed tomography in coronary screening,” Circulation, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 1908–1909, 1994.
- M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal et al., “Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention, council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and committee on cardiac imaging, council on clinical cardiology,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 16, pp. 1761–1791, 2006.
- A. S. Agatston, W. R. Janowitz, F. J. Hildner, N. R. Zusmer, M. Viamonte Jr., and R. Detrano, “Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 827–832, 1990.
- A. S. Levey, L. A. Stevens, C. H. Schmid et al., “A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 150, no. 9, pp. 604–612, 2009.
- N. W. Tietz, Ed., Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 3rd edition, 1995.
- M. Resl, M. Clodi, S. Neuhold et al., “Serum uric acid is related to cardiovascular events and correlates with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and albuminuria in patients with diabetes mellitus,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 721–725, 2012.
- A. Amin, F. Vakilian, and M. Maleki, “Serum uric acid levels correlate with filling pressures in systolic heart failure,” Congestive Heart Failure, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 80–84, 2011.
- M. C. Hsieh, H. M. Su, S. Y. Wang et al., “Significant correlation between left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and decreased glomerular filtration rate,” Renal Failure, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 977–982, 2011.
- Y. Nozari and B. Geraiely, “Correlation between the serum levels of uric acid and HS-CRP with the occurrence of early systolic failure of left ventricle following acute myocardial infarction,” Acta Medica Iranica, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 531–535, 2011.
- W. Doehner and U. Landmesser, “Xanthine oxidase and uric acid in cardiovascular disease: clinical impact and therapeutic options,” Seminars in Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 433–440, 2011.
- D. Misra, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and H. K. Choi, “The independent impact of congestive heart failure status and diuretic use on serum uric acid among men with a high cardiovascular risk profile: a prospective longitudinal study,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 471–476, 2011.
- L. Tamariz, A. Harzand, A. Palacio, S. Verma, J. Jones, and J. Hare, “Uric acid as a predictor of all-cause mortality in heart failure: a meta-analysis,” Congestive Heart Failure, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2011.
- G. S. Filippatos, M. I. Ahmed, J. D. Gladden et al., “Hyperuricaemia, chronic kidney disease, and outcomes in heart failure: potential mechanistic insights from epidemiological data,” European Heart Journal, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 712–720, 2011.
- P. E. Puddu, L. Iannetta, and M. Schiariti, “Age- and gender-normalized coronary incidence and mortality risks in primary and secondary prevention,” Cardiology Research, vol. 3, pp. 193–204, 2012.
- P. E. Puddu, M. Lanti, A. Menotti et al., “Serum uric acid for short-term prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence in the Gubbio population study,” Acta Cardiologica, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 243–251, 2001.
- A. Strasak, E. Ruttmann, L. Brant et al., “Serum uric acid and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a prospective long-term study of 83 683 Austrian men,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 273–284, 2008.
- A. M. Strasak, C. C. Kelleher, L. J. Brant et al., “Serum uric acid is an independent predictor for all major forms of cardiovascular death in 28,613 elderly women: a prospective 21-year follow-up study,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 232–239, 2008.
- H. Alcaíno, D. Greig, P. Castro et al., “The role of uric acid in heart failure,” Revista Medica de Chile, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 505–515, 2011.
- R. J. Johnson, M. A. Lanaspa, and E. A. Gaucher, “Uric acid: a danger signal from the RNA world that may have a role in the epidemic of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiorenal disease: evolutionary considerations,” Seminars in Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 394–399, 2011.