Hopf Bifurcation in an SEIDQV Worm Propagation Model with Quarantine Strategy

<table>Comparison of infectious hosts before and after adopting quarantine strategy if <svg height="13.0875" id="M179" style="vertical-align:-3.3907pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 42.299999 13.0875" width="42.299999" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,8.8)"><path d="M471 456q-22 -60 -37 -85q-20 -3 -84 -3q-9 0 -29 2t-29 2q-38 -145 -54 -234q-15 -80 14 -80q23 0 68 38l14 -25q-78 -83 -137 -83q-50 0 -50 64q0 25 7 57l67 266q-57 4 -98 -9t-80 -49l-20 21q14 18 27 31t36.5 30t56.5 26t73 9q26 0 82.5 -2t89.5 -2q21 0 32 5t24 24
z" id="x1D70F"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,12.982,8.8)"><path d="M512 230l-437 -233v58l378 199v2l-378 200v58l437 -233v-51z" id="x3E"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,27.685,8.8)"><path d="M471 456q-22 -60 -37 -85q-20 -3 -84 -3q-9 0 -29 2t-29 2q-38 -145 -54 -234q-15 -80 14 -80q23 0 68 38l14 -25q-78 -83 -137 -83q-50 0 -50 64q0 25 7 57l67 266q-57 4 -98 -9t-80 -49l-20 21q14 18 27 31t36.5 30t56.5 26t73 9q26 0 82.5 -2t89.5 -2q21 0 32 5t24 24
z" id="x1D70F"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,35.9,12.875)"><path d="M241 635q53 0 94 -28.5t63.5 -76t33.5 -102.5t11 -116q0 -58 -11 -112.5t-34 -103.5t-63.5 -78.5t-94.5 -29.5t-95 28t-64.5 75t-34.5 102.5t-11 118.5q0 58 11.5 112.5t34.5 103t64.5 78t95.5 29.5zM238 602q-32 0 -55.5 -25t-35.5 -68t-17.5 -91t-5.5 -105
q0 -76 10 -138.5t37 -107.5t69 -45q32 0 55.5 25t35.5 68.5t17.5 91.5t5.5 105t-5.5 105.5t-18 92t-36 68t-56.5 24.5z" id="x30"></path></g>
</svg><i>. </i></table>

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Hopf Bifurcation in an SEIDQV Worm Propagation Model with Quarantine Strategy 