About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 180717, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/180717
Research Article

Global Output Control for a Class of Inherently Higher-Order Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems Based on Homogeneous Domination Approach

1Key Laboratory of Measurement and Control of Complex Systems of Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China
2The School of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China

Received 13 September 2013; Accepted 1 November 2013

Academic Editor: Guoliang Wei

Copyright © 2013 Lin Chai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of global output feedback stabilization for a class of inherently higher-order uncertain nonlinear systems subject to time-delay. By using the homogeneous domination approach, we construct a homogeneous output feedback controller with an adjustable scaling gain. With the aid of a homogeneous Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, the scaling gain is adjusted to dominate the time-delay nonlinearities bounded by homogeneous growth conditions and render the closed-loop system globally asymptotically stable. In addition, we also show that the proposed approach is applicable for time-delay systems under nontriangular growth conditions.

1. Introduction

This paper addresses the global stabilization problem for a class of uncertain systems with delay which is described by where are the system states, is the control input, is the system output with , is a given time-delay constant, and is the initial function of the system state vector. The terms , , represent nonlinear perturbations that are not guaranteed to be precisely known.

It has been known that the problem of global output feedback stabilization for uncertain nonlinear systems is very challenging compared to the state feedback case. In the past decade, global stabilization by output feedback domination method has been proved to be achievable for a series of nonlinear systems. For the system of a five-spot pattern reservoir, a nonlinear reduced-order model is identified and an asymptotically stabilizing controller is proposed based on the circle criterion in [1]. With the help of linear feedback domination design [2], some interesting results have been established under a linear growth condition [2] and under a higher-order growth condition [3]. Recently, the homogeneous domination approach proposed in [3] has been used as a universal tool to solve the problem of global output feedback stabilization for inherently nonlinear systems. As a consequence, fruitful research results have been achieved in [39].

However, the aforementioned results have not considered the time-delay effect which is actually very common in state, input, and output due to the time consumed in sensing, information transmitting, and controller computing. In the case when the nonlinearities contain time-delay, some interesting results have been obtained. For instance, in [10], the global asymptotic stability analysis problem is investigated for a class of stochastic bidirectional associative memory (BAM) networks with mixed time-delays and parameter uncertainties. The paper [11] investigated the state estimation problem for a class of discrete time-delay nonlinear complex networks with randomly occurring phenomena from the sensor measurements. In [12], an adaptive approach was employed to design a state feedback controller to globally stabilize a class of upper-triangular systems with time-delay. The work [13] relaxed the growth condition imposed in [12] by employing a dynamic gain. In [14], a state feedback stabilizer was constructed for a class of time-delay higher-order nonlinear systems. In [15], the problem of state-feedback stabilization for a class of lower-triangular stochastic time-delay nonlinear systems was investigated.

In the case when only output is available, the problem of output feedback stabilization is more challenging and fewer results have been achieved for nonlinear systems with time-delay. For a linear system with time-delay in the input, the problem of output feedback stabilization of was solved in [16, 17]. For nonlinear systems (1) subject to time-delay and uncertainties, the problem of output feedback stabilization has not been extensively investigated.

In this paper, we aim to tackle the problem by using the output feedback domination approach. First, based on homogeneous domination approach [3, 9], output feedback controllers are constructed to globally stabilize higher-order nonlinear time-delay systems whose nonlinearities are bounded by homogeneous growth conditions. Then, we construct a Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and use it to choose an appropriate scaling gain in the output feedback controller to guarantee the closed-loop system globally asymptotic stability. In addition, homogeneous output stabilization controllers are extended to the nontriangular time-delay systems. The simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

2. Homogeneous Output Feedback Controllers of Inherently Nonlinear Systems

In this section, we show that under a lower-triangular homogeneous growth condition, the nonlinear time-delay system (1) can be globally stabilized by a homogeneous output feedback controller. First, we consider the nonlinear continuous functions , , which satisfy the following higher-order growth condition.

Assumption 1. Consider the following: where , , , , for , and . Denoting and , for . The objective of this note is to prove that the growth condition, namely, Assumption 1, guarantees the existence of a linear dynamic homogeneous output feedback controller based on observer: where and , are the gains selected by Theorem 3.1 in [5] renders system (7) globally asymptotically stable, with where , , and are constants, for are known powers of 2, and , are continuous functions.

Remark 2. When , (2) is a higher-order growth condition which is actually homogeneous (see Definition A.1 in the appendix) with the following dilation (For simplicity, in this paper we assume with an even integer and an odd integer . Therefore, is a ratio of two odd integers.)
First, we construct a output feedback stabilizer for the following linear system where , are the control input and system output, respectively. Using the approach in [5], we can design for (7) a homogeneous output feedback stabilizer, which can be described in the following lemma.

Lemma 3. There exists a dynamic homogeneous output feedback controller based on observer: where , and , are the same with those in (4).

It can be verified that the closed-loop system (7)–(9) is homogeneous according to Definition A.1 in the appendix. As a matter of fact, by defining the compact notation , the closed-loop system (7)–(9) can be rewritten as the following compact form: where , . Moreover, by introducing the dilation weight system (10) is homogeneous of degree according to Definition A.1 in the appendix. Since system (10) is globally stable by Lemma 3, therefore, by Lemmas A.2 and A.3 in the appendix, there exists a homogeneous Lyapunov function with the degree such that where . Moreover, by Lemma A.4 in the appendix, for , the following holds:

Theorem 4. Consider system (1) under Assumption 1. For any given delay constant , there exists a homogeneous output feedback controller (3) based on observer (4) such that system (1) can be globally stabilized.

Proof. The output feedback controller is constructed by introducing a scaling gain into the output feedback controller obtained in Lemma 3. First, we define a change of coordinates as where the constant gain will be determined later. Under (14), system (1) can be rewritten as The observer (9) can be rewritten as follows: where the same , as in (9). Now, the closed-loop system (15) and (16) can be rewritten as where the vector field has the exactly same construction of (10). Therefore, we adopt the same Lyapunov function used in (12), whose derivative along (17) is According to Assumption 1, there exists a constant such that for a constant , since it can be seen that by definition , so Substituting (13) and (19) into (18) yields By Lemma A.5 in the appendix, there exists a constant such that which yields Construct a candidate Lyapunov functional as follows: where is a positive constant. Let , so it follows from (23) and (24) that Hence, by choosing a large enough as , where , the right-hand side of (25) is negative definite, that is, there exists a constant , such that As a conclusion, we know that the system described by (1) under Assumption 1 can be globally stabilized by the output controller (8).

3. Extension to Nontriangular Systems

Assumption 5. Consider the following By (19), it is apparent that Assumption 5 includes Assumption 1 as a special case. The next theorem is a more general result achieved under Assumption 5.

Theorem 6. Under Assumption 5, there exist constants and , and such that the homogeneous output feedback controller (3) globally stabilizes system (1).

Proof of Theorem 6. The proof is very similar to that of Theorem 4. We can use the exactly same observer (4) and control law (3). Although the nonlinear function is not in the triangular form, Assumption 5 will lead directly to (19) by using the change of coordinates (14). Then, the global stabilization can be concluded with an appropriate choice of gain , which is similar to that in (25). The detailed proof is omitted here for brevity.

4. Examples and Simulations

Consider the following inherently nonlinear time-delay system.

Example 1. Consider Therefore, Assumption 1 holds for , , , , and . By (3), the output controller can be constructed as where we choose , , , and . The computer simulation results of the closed-loop systems are given in Figures 1 and 2 with the following initial functions , , for .

180717.fig.001
Figure 1: State trajectories ofin (28).
180717.fig.002
Figure 2: Time history ofin (29).

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we have studied the problem of global output feedback stabilization for a class of higher-order time-delay nonlinear systems under a homogeneous condition. First, homogeneous output feedback controllers have been constructed with adjustable scaling gains. Then, with the help of a homogeneous Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, we’ve redesigned the homogeneous domination approach to tune the scaling gain for the overall stability of the closed-loop systems. The output feedback controllers proposed in this paper are memoryless and, therefore, can be easily implemented in practice.

Appendix

This appendix collects the definition of homogeneous function and several useful lemmas.

Definition A.1 (see [18]). For a set of coordinates and an -tuple of positive real numbers .(i)The dilation is defined by , , , with being called as the weights of the coordinates. For simplicity of notation, we define dilation weight .(ii)A function is said to be -homogeneous of degree    if , , .(iii)A vector field is said to be -homogeneous of degree if the component is -homogeneous of degree for each , that is, , , , .

Lemma A.2 (see [18]). If the trivial solution of the -homogeneous system is globally asymptotically stable, there exists a -homogeneous Lyapunov function , which is positive definite and proper, such that

Lemma A.3 (see [18]). Denote as dilation weight, and suppose and are homogeneous functions with degree and respectively. Then is still a homogeneous function with degree of with same dilation weight .

Lemma A.4 (see [18]). Suppose is a homogeneous function of degree with respect to dilation weight , then the following holds.(1) is homogeneous of degree with being the homogeneous weight of .(2)There is a constant such that . Moreover, if is positive definite, , for a constant .

Lemma A.5 (see [5]). Let , be positive real numbers. The following holds for , , and any positive real-valued function

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61374038, 61273119, 61174076), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK2011253), and Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20110092110021).

References

  1. Y. Chen and K. A. Hoo, “Stability analysis for closed-loop management of a reservoir based on identification of reduced-order nonlinear model,” Systems Science & Control Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Qian and W. Lin, “Output feedback control of a class of nonlinear systems: a nonseparation principle paradigm,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1710–1715, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. C. Qian, “Semi-global stabilization of a class of uncertain nonlinear systems by linear output feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Circuit and Systems II, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 218–222, 2005.
  4. S. Ding and S. Li, “Global uniform asymptotical stability of a class of nonlinear cascaded system,” International Journal of System Science, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1310–1312, 2010.
  5. J. Polendo and C. Qian, “A generalized homogeneous domination approach for global stabilization of inherently nonlinear systems via output feedback,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 605–629, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. C. Qian, “A homogeneous domination approach for global output feedback stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Portland, Ore, USA, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. V. Andrieu, L. Praly, and A. Astolfi, “Homogeneous approximation, recursive observer design, and output feedback,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1814–1850, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. H. Lei and W. Lin, “Robust control of uncertain systems with polynomial nonlinearity by output feedback,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 692–723, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. J. Li, C. Qian, and M. T. Frye, “A dual-observer design for global output feedback stabilization of nonlinear systems with low-order and high-order nonlinearities,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 19, no. 15, pp. 1697–1720, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. H. Shu, Z. Wang, and Z. Lü, “Global asymptotic stability of uncertain stochastic bi-directional associative memory networks with discrete and distributed delays,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 490–505, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. D. Ding, Z. Wang, B. Shen, and H. Shu, “H-infinity state estimation for discrete-time complex networks with randomly occurring sensor saturations and randomly varying sensor delays,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 725–736, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. X. Ye, “Adaptive stabilization of time-delay feedforward nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 950–955, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. X. Zhang, L. Baron, Q. Liu, and E.-K. Boukas, “Design of stabilizing controllers with a dynamic gain for feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 692–697, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. Z. Sun and Y. Liu, “State-feedback stabilization control design for a class of time-delay high-order nonlinear systems,” in Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control Conference, Qufu, China, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. W. Chen, J. Wu, and L. C. Jiao, “State-feedback stabilization for a class of stochastic time-delay nonlinear systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 1921–1937, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. H.-L. Choi and J.-T. Lim, “Stabilization of a chain of integrators with an unknown delay in the input by adaptive output feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1359–1363, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. H.-L. Choi and J.-T. Lim, “Output feedback regulation of a chain of integrators with an unknown time-varying delay in the input,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 263–268, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. L. Rosier, “Homogeneous Lyapunov function for homogeneous continuous vector fields,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 467–473, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet