• Views 300
• Citations 0
• ePub 29
• PDF 235
`Discrete Dynamics in Nature and SocietyVolume 2013 (2013), Article ID 784279, 5 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/784279`
Research Article

New Interval Oscillation Criteria for Certain Linear Hamiltonian Systems

1School of Mathematical Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China
2Department of Mathematics, Jining University, Qufu 273155, China

Received 30 January 2013; Accepted 16 April 2013

Copyright © 2013 Jing Shao and Fanwei Meng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Using a generalized Riccati transformation and the general integral means technique, some new interval oscillation criteria for the linear matrix Hamiltonian system , , are obtained. These results generalize and improve the oscillation criteria due to Zheng (2008). An example is given to dwell upon the importance of our results.

1. Introduction

Hamiltonian matrix systems arise in many dynamic problems; the qualitative properties of Hamiltonian systems and matrix differential systems have been widely studied by many authors (e.g., see [117] and the references quoted there in). In this paper, we consider interval oscillatory properties for the linear Hamiltonian system: where , , and are matrices of real valued continuous functions on the interval, , , is positive definite, , and , are real valued continuous functions on . Here and in the sequel, the transpose of matrix is denoted by and its positive definiteness is denoted by . For any Hermitian matrix , its eigenvalues are real numbers, and we always denote them by . The trace of is denoted by , and recall that .

When , the system (1) reduces to the following linear self-adjoint matrix Hamiltonian system:

A solution of the system (1) (or (2)) is said to be nontrivial if for at least one . A nontrivial solution of the system (1) (or (2)) is said to be prepared or self-conjugate if , . System (1) (or (2)) is said to be oscillatory on if there is a nontrivial prepared solution of (1) such that vanishes at least once on for each . Otherwise, it is said to be nonoscillatory.

Firstly, we give some of the definitions for the sake of convenience.

Definition 1. Let be the linear space of real matrices, and let be the subspace of all symmetric matrices in . For any , means that is positive semidefinite and means that is positive definite.

Definition 2. A function is called to belong to a function class , denoted by , if , where ( is the closure of ) which satisfies , for . Furthermore, has continuous derivatives and on such that for all , where are functions determined by . Note that for ; and with , for , and belong to function class . For given , , a function is called to belong to a function class , denoted by , if , , for , and . We point out that if , and we define a function with for , where are constants, then .

Definition 3. A nonlinear (and possibly discontinuous) function with whenever is called negativity preserving; the class of all such negativity-preserving functionals on is denoted by .

The negativity-preserving functionals are widely used in oscillation criteria for matrix differential systems in paper [2]. Meanwhile, using negativity-preserving functionals, Zheng [11] considered the matrix system (2); oscillation criteria of interval type were obtained with the function as follows.

Theorem 4. Suppose that there exists such that is differentiable, and . If there exists , such that where and . Then system (2) is oscillatory.

Theorem 5. Suppose that . If, for each and for some , where , then system (2) is oscillatory.

In this paper, using negativity-preserving functionals on a suitable matrix space and generalized Riccati transformation, we establish some new oscillation criteria for the system (1), which extend and improve the oscillation criteria mentioned previously, and an example is given which dwells upon the importance of our results.

2. Main Results

Now, we give the main oscillation criteria for system (1) of interval type.

Theorem 6. Suppose that there exists such that is differentiable, and . If there exists , such that where and is any constant nonzero symmetric matrix, then system (1) is oscillatory.

Proof. Suppose that there exists a prepared solution of (1) which is not oscillatory. Without loss of generality, we may assume that for . Define Then is Hermitian and satisfies the Riccati equation Let . Then we get It follows from (9) and (10) that, for , Since , we define . Let . Then For each , by assumptions, there exist , , and satisfying . Now, multiplying (11) by and integrating it from to , we have which implies that Applying the functional to (14), we obtain a contradiction with assumption (6). This completes the proof.

Corollary 7. Suppose that there exists such that is differentiable, and . If, for each , there exist , , and such that for some , where is defined as previously mentioned, then system (1) is oscillatory.

Corollary 8. Suppose that there exists such that is differentiable, and . If there exists and, for each , there exist and such that where is defined as that in Theorem 6, and then system (1) is oscillatory.

Let , ; we have the following useful corollary.

Corollary 9. Suppose that there exists such that, is differentiable, and . If there exists such that for each , where is defined as in Theorem 6, and then system (1) is oscillatory.

Theorem 10. Suppose that . If, for each and for some , where and are defined as in Theorem 6, then system (1) is oscillatory.

Proof. We choose , so , and As in the proof of Theorem 6, we obtain (14), with being replaced by , replaced by , and the integral variable being replaced by , that is, Suppose that , we get So As in the proof of [11, Theorem 2.7], we obtain Dividing both sides by and taking the largest eigenvalue, we have This contradicts with condition (20). The proof of Theorem 10 is completed.

3. Examples

We give the following example to illustrate the applicability of our theorems.

Example  1. Consider the 4-dimensional system (1), where We get that . Let ; let , and we have . For each , select to be large enough such that . Let . Using Theorem 6, we have So we obtain that the Hamiltonian system is oscillatory for .

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the referees for giving some useful comments which improve their results. This research was partially supported by the NSF of China (Grants 11171178 and 11271225) and the Science and Technology Project of High Schools of Shandong Province (Grant J12LI52).

References

1. S. G. Dubé and A. B. Mingarelli, “Note on a non-oscillation theorem of Atkinson,” Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 2004, no. 22, pp. 1–6, 2004.
2. A. B. Mingarelli, “Nonlinear functionals in oscillation theory of matrix differential systems,” Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2004.
3. S. G. A. Dubé and A. B. Mingarelli, “Nonlinear functionals and a theorem of Sun,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 308, no. 1, pp. 208–220, 2005.
4. K. I. Al-Dosary, H. K. Abdullah, and D. Hussein, “Short note on oscillation of matrix Hamiltonian systems,” Yokohama Mathematical Journal, vol. 50, no. 1-2, pp. 23–30, 2003.
5. F. Meng and A. B. Mingarelli, “Oscillation of linear Hamiltonian systems,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 897–904, 2003.
6. Q. Yang and Y. Tang, “Oscillation theorems for self-adjoint matrix Hamiltonian systems involving general means,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. 355–377, 2004.
7. F. Meng and Y. Sun, “Interval criteria for oscillation of linear Hamiltonian systems,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 40, no. 7-8, pp. 735–743, 2004.
8. Q. Yang, R. Mathsen, and S. Zhu, “Oscillation theorems for self-adjoint matrix Hamiltonian systems,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 306–329, 2003.
9. Y. G. Sun, “New oscillation criteria for linear matrix Hamiltonian systems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 279, no. 2, pp. 651–658, 2003.
10. Z. Zheng, “Oscillation theorems for linear matrix Hamiltonian systems,” Applied Mathematics—A Journal of Chinese Universities, vol. 17, pp. 285–290, 2002 (Chinese).
11. Z. Zheng, “Interval oscillation criteria for linear Hamiltonian systems,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 281, no. 11, pp. 1664–1671, 2008.
12. Z. Zheng, “Linear transformation and oscillation criteria for Hamiltonian systems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 332, no. 1, pp. 236–245, 2007.
13. F. Meng and Y. Sun, “Oscillation of linear Hamiltonian systems,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 44, no. 10-11, pp. 1467–1477, 2002.
14. L. H. Erbe, Q. Kong, and S. G. Ruan, “Kamenev type theorems for second-order matrix differential systems,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 957–962, 1993.
15. Q. Yang and Y. Tang, “Interval oscillation criteria for self-adjoint matrix Hamiltonian systems,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section A, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 1085–1108, 2005.
16. I. S. Kumari and S. Umamaheswaram, “Oscillation criteria for linear matrix Hamiltonian systems,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 174–198, 2000.
17. W. Kratz, Quadratic Functionals in Variational Analysis and Control Theory, vol. 6 of Mathematical Topics, Akademie, Berlin, Germany, 1995.