About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 127185, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/127185
Research Article

Viability Discrimination of a Class of Control Systems on a Nonsmooth Region

1School of Mathematics, Physics and Biological Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China
2Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1

Received 27 July 2013; Revised 16 December 2013; Accepted 18 December 2013; Published 12 January 2014

Academic Editor: Zhigang Jiang

Copyright © 2014 Na Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. S. Shaikh and P. E. Caines, “On the hybrid optimal control problem: theory and algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1587–1603, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. M. Boccadoro, Y. Wardi, M. Egerstedt, and E. Verriest, “Optimal control of switching surfaces in hybrid dynamical systems,” Journal of Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 433–448, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. D. Liberzon, Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory, A Concise Introduction, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2012. View at MathSciNet
  4. H. S. Witsenhausen, “A class of hybrid-state continuous-time dynamic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 11, pp. 161–167, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. H. Wong-Toi, “Synthesis of controllers for linear hybrid automata,” in Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4607–4613, San Diego, Calif, USA, December 1997. View at Scopus
  6. J. Lygeros, C. Tomlin, and S. Sastry, “Controllers for reachability specifications for hybrid systems,” Automatica, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 349–370, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. C. J. Tomlin, J. Lygeros, and S. Shankar Sastry, “A game theoretic approach to controller design for hybrid systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 949–969, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J.-P. Aubin, Viability Theory, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1991. View at MathSciNet
  9. J.-P. Aubin, “A survey of viability theory,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 749–788, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. J.-P. Aubin, J. Lygeros, M. Quincampoix, S. Sastry, and N. Seube, “Impulse differential inclusions: a viability approach to hybrid systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 2–20, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. P. Cardaliaguet, M. Quincampoix, and P. Saint-Pierre, “Pursuit differential games with state constraints,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1615–1632, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. Y. Gao, J. Lygeros, and M. Quincampoix, “On the reachability problem for uncertain hybrid systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1572–1586, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. Y. Gao, J. Lygeros, M. Quincampoix, and N. Seube, “On the control of uncertain impulsive systems: approximate stabilization and controlled invariance,” International Journal of Control, vol. 77, no. 16, pp. 1393–1407, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. M. Quincampoix and N. Seube, “Stabilization of uncertain control systems through piecewise constant feedback,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 240–255, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. F. Blanchini, “Set invariance in control,” Automatica, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1747–1767, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. B. E. A. Milani and C. E. T. Dórea, “On invariant polyhedra of continuous-time systems subject to additive disturbances,” Automatica, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 785–789, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. J.-P. Aubin, Optima and Equilibria: An Introduction to Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 140, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1993. View at MathSciNet
  18. Y. Gao, “Determining the viability for a affine nonlinear control system,” Control Theory and Applications, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 654–656, 2009. View at Scopus
  19. N. U. Ahmed, “Optimal relaxed controls for systems governed by impulsive differential inclusions,” Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Applications, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 427–460, 2005. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. Y. Gao, “Viability criteria for differential inclusions,” Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 825–834, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. Y. Gao, “Determining the viability for a class of nonlinear control systems,” Information and Control, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 510–512, 2005.