About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 158386, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/158386
Research Article

Investors’ Risk Preference Characteristics Based on Different Reference Point

School of Business, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China

Received 6 January 2014; Accepted 12 March 2014; Published 9 April 2014

Academic Editor: Chuangxia Huang

Copyright © 2014 Fenghua Wen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Keasey and P. Moon, “Gambling with the house money in capital expenditure decisions: an experimental analysis,” Economics Letters, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Sadorsky, “Time-varying risk premiums in petroleum futures prices,” Energy Economics, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 539–556, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Y. Javid, “Time varying risk return relationship: evidence from listed Pakistani firms,” European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 16–39, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Kostek and L. Ashrafioun, “Tired winners: the effects of cognitive resources and prior winning on risky decision making,” Journal of Gambling Studies, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. P. R. Locke and S. C. Mann, “Professional trader discipline and trade disposition,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 401–444, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Frino, J. Grant, and D. Johnstone, “The house money effect and local traders on the Sydney Futures Exchange,” Pacific Basin Finance Journal, vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 8–25, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y.-J. Liu, C.-L. Tsai, M.-C. Wang, and N. Zhu, “Prior consequences and subsequent risk taking: new field evidence from the Taiwan futures exchange,” Management Science, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 606–620, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Weber and C. F. Camerer, “The disposition effect in securities trading: an experimental analysis,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 167–184, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. S. Haigh and J. A. List, “Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis,” Journal of Finance, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 523–534, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Weber and H. Zuchel, “How do prior outcomes affect risk preference? Comparing escalation of commitment and the house-money effect,” Decision Analysis, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–43, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  11. H. Shefrin and M. Statman, “The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers to long: theory and evidence,” Journal of Finance, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 777–790, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  12. T. Odean, “Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?” Journal of Finance, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1775–1798, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Jordan and J. D. Diltz, “Day traders and the disposition effect,” The Journal of Behavioral Finance, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 192–200, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk,” Econometrics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–291, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  15. R. H. Thaler and E. J. Johnson, “Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice,” Management Science, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 643–660, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Massa and A. Simonov, “Behavioral biases and investment,” Review of Finance, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 483–507, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. F. Ackert, N. Charupat, B. K. Church, and R. Deaves, “An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting,” Experimental Economics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. L. Hsu and E. H. Chow, “The house money effect on investment risk taking: evidence from Taiwan,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1102–1115, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. N. Barberis and W. Xiong, “What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation,” Journal of Finance, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 751–784, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. O. I. Hoffmann, S. F. Henry, and N. Kalogeras, “Aspirations as reference points: an experimental investigation of risk behavior over time,” Theory and Decision, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 193–210, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. J. D. Coval and T. Shumway, “Do behavioral biases affect prices?” Journal of Finance, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Mattos and P. Garcia, “The effect of prior loss and gain on current risk-taking using quantile regression,” in Proceedings of the NCCC134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 2009.
  23. Y. C. Huang and S. H. Chan, “The house money and break-even effects for different types of traders: evidence from Taiwan futures markets,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 26, pp. 1–13, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  24. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 297–323, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Zhang, “Prospect theory and its application,” Consume Guide, vol. 16, pp. 225–226, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  26. D. Lam and B. Ozorio, “The effect of prior outcomes on gender risk-taking differences,” Journal of Risk Research, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 791–802, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. C. Heath, S. Huddart, and M. Lang, “Psychological factors and stock option exercise,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 601–627, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. M. Poteshman and V. Serbin, “Clearly irrational financial market behavior: evidence from the early exercise of exchange traded stock options,” Journal of Finance, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 37–70, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Grinblatt and M. Keloharju, “What makes investors trade?” Journal of Finance, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 589–616, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. U. Gneezy, Updating the Reference Level: Experimental Evidence, Experimental Business Research, 2005.
  31. L. Vinokur, “Dispositon in the carbon market and institutional constraints,” Working Paper, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. R. Anderson, “Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. M. Mandler and G. H. Ritchey, “Long-term memory for pictures,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 386–396, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Grinblatt and B. Han, “Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 311–339, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. K. Kopalle and J. Lindsey-Mullikin, “The effect of external reference price on consumer price expectations,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 225–237, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  36. A. Taudes and C. Rudloff, “Integrating inventory control and a price change in the presence of reference price effects: a two-period model,” Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 29–65, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  37. F. Wen and X. Yang, “Skewness of return distribution and coefficient of risk premium,” Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 360–371, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. F. Wen, Z. He, and X. Chen, “Investors' risk preference characteristics and conditional skewness,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 814965, 14 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet