About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 165259, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/165259
Research Article

Lattice Methods for Pricing American Strangles with Two-Dimensional Stochastic Volatility Models

1School of Economic Mathematics and School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
2School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China

Received 22 January 2014; Accepted 5 April 2014; Published 28 April 2014

Academic Editor: Chuangxia Huang

Copyright © 2014 Xuemei Gao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. L. Heston, “A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 6, pp. 327–343, 1993.
  2. P. Ritchken and R. Trevor, “Pricing options under generalized GARCH and stochastic volatility processes,” Journal of Finance, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 377–402, 1999. View at Scopus
  3. N. Cakici and K. Topyan, “The GARCH option pricing model: a lattice approach,” Quantitative Finance, vol. 2, pp. 432–442, 2000.
  4. C.-C. Wu, “The GARCH option pricing model: a modification of lattice approach,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Akyildirim, Y. Dolinsky, and H. Soner, “Approximating stochastic volatility by recombinant trees,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3555v1.
  6. P. Boyle, “A lattice framework for option pricing with two state variables,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 23, pp. 1–2, 1988.
  7. P. Boyle, J. Evnine, and S. Gibbs, “Numerical evaluation of multivariate contingent claims,” Review of Financial Studied, vol. 2, pp. 241–250, 1989.
  8. R.-R. Chen, S.-L. Chung, and T. T. Yang, “Option pricing in a multi-asset, complete market economy,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 649–666, 2002. View at Scopus
  9. A. Gamba and L. Trigeorgis, “An improved binomial lattice method for multi-dimensional options,” Applied Mathematical Finance, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 453–475, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. K.-S. Moon, W.-J. Kim, and H. Kim, “Adaptive lattice methods for multi-asset models,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 352–366, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. C. Chiarella and A. Ziogas, “Evaluation of American strangles,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 31–62, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. F. Moraux, “On perpetual American strangles,” Journal of Derivatives, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 82–97, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J.-C. Duan, “The GARCH option pricing model,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–32, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. F. A. Longstaff and E. S. Schwartz, “Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 113–147, 2001. View at Scopus
  15. C. X. Huang, X. Gong, X. Chen, and F. H. Wen, “Measuring and forecasting volatility in Chinese stock market using HAR-CJ-M model,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 143194, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar