About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 428568, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/428568
Research Article

Analysis of Price Stackelberg Duopoly Game with Bounded Rationality

1School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received 18 October 2013; Revised 9 January 2014; Accepted 9 January 2014; Published 17 February 2014

Academic Editor: Stepan A. Tersian

Copyright © 2014 Lian Shi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Cournot, Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théoris des Richesses, Hachette, Paris, France, 1838.
  2. H. N. Agiza and A. A. Elsadany, “Nonlinear dynamics in the Cournot duopoly game with heterogeneous players,” Physica A, vol. 320, no. 1–4, pp. 512–524, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. H. N. Agiza and A. A. Elsadany, “Chaotic dynamics in nonlinear duopoly game with heterogeneous players,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 843–860, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. M. Kopel, “Simple and complex adjustment dynamics in Cournot duopoly models,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 2031–2048, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. J. X. Zhang, Q. L. Da, and Y. H. Wang, “Analysis of nonlinear duopoly game with heterogeneous players,” Economic Modelling, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 138–148, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Dubiel-Teleszynski, “Nonlinear dynamics in a heterogeneous duopoly game with adjusting players and diseconomies of scale,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 296–308, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. F. Tramontana, “Heterogeneous duopoly with isoelastic demand function,” Economic Modelling, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 350–357, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Puu, “Complex dynamics with three oligopolists,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 2075–2081, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. N. Agiza, G. I. Bischi, and M. Kopel, “Multistability in a dynamic Cournot game with three oligopolists,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 51, no. 1-2, pp. 63–90, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. A. Agliari, L. Gardini, and T. Puu, “The dynamics of a triopoly Cournot game,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 2531–2560, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. E. M. Elabbasy, H. N. Agiza, A. A. Elsadany, and H. El-Metwally, “The dynamics of triopoly game with heterogeneous players,” International Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–90, 2007. View at MathSciNet
  12. E. M. Elabbasy, H. N. Agiza, and A. A. Elsadany, “Analysis of nonlinear triopoly game with heterogeneous players,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 488–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. H. X. Yao, L. Shi, and H. Xi, “Analysis of triopoly game with isoelastic demand function and heterogeneous players,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2012, Article ID 280824, 16 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. J. Bertrand, “Théorie mathématique de la richesse sociale,” Journal des Savants, pp. 499–508, 1883.
  15. H. Gravelle and R. Rees, Microeconomics, Longman, Harlow, UK, 2nd edition, 1992.
  16. J. X. Zhang, Q. L. Da, and Y. H. Wang, “The dynamics of Bertrand model with bounded rationality,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 2048–2055, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. B. G. Xin and T. Chen, “On a master-slave Bertrand game model,” Economic Modelling, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1864–1870, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Chen, J. H. Ma, and X. Q. Chen, “The study of dynamic process of the triopoly games in chinese 3G telecommunication market,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1542–1551, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Peng, Z. Miao, and F. Peng, “Study on a 3-dimensional game model with delayed bounded rationality,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 5, pp. 1568–1576, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. H. Stackelberg, Marketform und Gleichgewicht, Julius Springer, Vienna, Austria, 1934.
  21. R. Gibbons, Game Theory for Applied Economists, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1992.
  22. X. Vives, Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tool, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1999.
  23. A. Dixit, “Comparative statics for oligopoly,” International Economic Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 107–122, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet