- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 793761, 13 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/793761

## Dynamic Behaviors of Holling Type II Predator-Prey System with Mutual Interference and Impulses

College of Mathematics and System Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China

Received 22 November 2013; Accepted 30 April 2014; Published 29 May 2014

Academic Editor: Guang Zhang

Copyright © 2014 Hongli Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

A class of Holling type II predator-prey systems with mutual interference and impulses is presented. Sufficient conditions for the permanence, extinction, and global attractivity of system are obtained. The existence and uniqueness of positive periodic solution are also established. Numerical simulations are carried out to illustrate the theoretical results. Meanwhile, they indicate that dynamics of species are very sensitive with the period matching between species’ intrinsic disciplinarians and the perturbations from the variable environment. If the periods between individual growth and impulse perturbations match well, then the dynamics of species periodically change. If they mismatch each other, the dynamics differ from period to period until there is chaos.

#### 1. Introduction

As pointed out by Berryman [1], the dynamic relationship between predators and their prey has long been and will continue to be one of the dominant themes in both biology and mathematical biology due its universal existence and importance. Though predator-prey models with periodic or almost periodic coefficients have been studied extensively (see [2–14] and the references cited therein), few papers consider the mutual interference between the predators and prey, which was introduced by Hassell in 1971. During his research of the capturing behavior between hosts and parasites, he found that the hosts or parasites had the tendency to leave each other when they met, which interfered with hosts capture effects. Obviously, the mutual interference will be stronger, while the size of parasite becomes larger. From the observation, Hassell introduced the concept of mutual interference constant and established a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with mutual interference as follows: where and are the sizes of the prey and predator populations, respectively, and is mutual interference constant; see [15, 16] for more details on the biological meaning of mutual interference constant . Some results have appeared for this type of predator-prey system [17–20].

Recently, much more attention has paid on the functional responses. Based on experiments, Holling [21] investigated three different kinds of functional responses for different kinds of species to model the phenomena of predation, which made the standard Lotka-Volterra system more consistent with the real ecosystem. The Lotka-Volterra system with Holling type II functional response is introduced by Wang and Zhu [22] in the following form:

However, ecological system is often deeply perturbed by nature and human exploit activities (e.g., fire, drought, flooding deforestation, hunting, harvesting, breeding, etc.), which are not suitable to be considered continually. To accurately describe the system, impulsive differential equations may be a better candidate than ordinary differential equation. The theory of impulsive differential equations not only is now being recognized to be richer than the corresponding theory of differential equations without impulse, but also represents a more natural framework for mathematical modelling of many real-world phenomena. In recent years, many important and interesting results on the permanence, extinction, global attractivity of systems, the existence and uniqueness of positive periodic solutions, bifurcation and dynamical complexity, and so forth have been proposed in [23–28] and references cited therein. Motivated by above studies, in this paper we will consider the following Holling II predator-prey system with mutual interference and impulses: where and are the sizes of the prey and predator populations, respectively. and is a positive constant. , , and are continuous periodic functions defined on with a common period . , , are strictly positive. Also , . Assume that , are constants. and , and there exists an integer such that , , . The interpretations of parameters can be seen in Table 1.

The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we give some definitions and state some lemmas which are essential to study the main theorems. In Section 3, sufficient conditions for the permanence, extinction of system (3), and the existence, uniqueness, and global attractivity of positive periodic solution are obtained. In Section 4, numerical examples are presented to illustrate our results. In the last section, we give a brief discussion.

#### 2. Preliminaries

In this section, we introduce some notations and definitions and state some lemmas which will be useful in the subsequent sections.

Let , . The map is defined by the right hand of the first and second equations of system (3). Let ; then is said to belong to class if(1)is continuous in and for each , , there exists ;(2) is locally Lipschitzian in .

*Definition 1. *Let ; then, for , the upper right derivative of with respect to the impulsive differential system (3) is defined as

*Definition 2. *System (3) is permanent, if, for any positive solution of system (3), there exist positive constants , , , and such that

Lemma 3 ([29]). *Let and is a solution of (3) with initial value . Assume that
**
where is continuous in and for , , exists and is nondecreasing. Let be the maximal solution of scalar impulsive differential equation
**
existing on . Then implies that for all .**Similarly, assume that inequality (6) is reversed. Let be the minimal solution of (7) existing on . Then, implies that for all .*

Let be continuous -periodic function defined on the ; we introduce the following notation:

Consider the following periodic logistic equation with impulses: We have the following results.

Lemma 4 (see [30]). *(**1)* If
*
then system (9) has a unique T-periodic solution , which is globally asymptotically stable.**(2)* If
*
then .*

Consider a periodic Logistic equation with impulses: where is a positive constant, and are continuous -periodic functions with and , and , . We have the following results.

Lemma 5 (see [31]). *(**1)* If
*
then system (10) has a unique -periodic solution , which is globally asymptotically stable.**(2)* If
*
then .*

Lemma 6 (see [31]). *Let be the unique -periodic positive solution of system (9) and the unique -periodic positive solution of the following system:
**
where is the continuous T-periodic function with and . Then
*

Furthermore, we consider the following periodic logistic equation with impulses: By Lemma 5, we have the following Corollary.

Corollary 7. *If
**
then system (15) has a unique T-periodic solution , which is globally asymptotically stable.*

Next, one considers the following periodic logistic equation with impulses:

By Lemma 5, we have the following Corollary.

Corollary 8. *If
**
then system (16) has a unique T-periodic solution , which is globally asymptotically stable.*

#### 3. Main Results

In this section, we will study the permanence, extinction, and global attractivity of system (3) and the existence and uniqueness of positive periodic solution.

Lemma 9. *For any solution of system (3), if , , then and for all .*

*Proof. *From the first equation of (3), one has
where
thus, from , we have
Similarly, it follows from the second equation of system (3) that . This completes the proof of Lemma 9.

Lemma 10. *Assuming that and hold, for any positive solution of system (3), there exist constants such that
*

*Proof. *First, we show that is ultimate upper bounded. It follows from (3) that
Consider the following auxiliary system:
By Lemma 3, we have , where is the solution of (22) with . By , from Lemma 4 we get that system (22) has a unique -periodic solution , which is globally stable. Therefore, for any being small enough, there exists a such that
for any . Let ; we have
for any . Let ; we obtain

Next, we prove that is ultimately upper bounded. Define . From system (3), we have
For any and , we have
Consider the following auxiliary system:
By Lemma 3, for any , we have , where is the solution of (28) with . By , from Lemma 5, system (28) has a unique -periodic solution , which is globally stable. Therefore, letting , from Lemma 6, we have . Letting , for any being small enough, there exists , and we have
for any . Let ; we have
This completes the proof of Lemma 10.

Theorem 11. *Assume that and hold, and
**
where is the unique T-periodic solution of system (16) and . Then species and are permanent.*

*Proof. *From Lemma 9, there exist constants such that
From the proof of Lemma 10, for above being small enough, there exists such that
for any . From the first equation of system (3), for and , we have
Consider the following auxiliary system:
where is the solution of (34) with . By Lemma 3, for any , we have . From condition , we have
From inequality (35) and Lemma 4, system (34) has a unique -periodic solution , which is globally stable. Since condition holds, for the above being small enough, we have ; letting , from Lemma 6, we have . Letting , for the above being small enough, there exists such that , for any . Let ; we have . From system (3), for and , we have
Consider the following auxiliary system:
where is the solution of (37) with . By Lemma 3, for all , we have , for the above being small enough. By condition , we obtain
From inequality (38), Lemma 4, system (37) has a unique -periodic solution , which is globally asymptotically stable. Since condition holds, for the above being small enough, such that , let , and from Lemma 6, we have , where is the unique -periodic globally asymptotically stable solution of the following system:
Letting , for the above being small enough, there exists such that , for any . Let ; we have .

Theorem 12. *Assume that
**
Then, for any positive solution of system (3), one has
**
where and are unique T-periodic solutions of systems (9) and (39), respectively.*

*Proof. *From system (3), for and , we have
Consider the following auxiliary system:
From and Lemma 4, we have
Therefore, for being small enough, there exists such that for any . Since holds, we obtain
Thus, from the first equation of system (3), we have
for any . Consider the following auxiliary system
From and Lemma 4, system (46) has unique -periodic solutions and , respectively, which are globally asymptotically stable. By Lemma 3, for any being small enough, there exists such that for any ; letting , we have ; since is arbitrarily small, we have .

Theorem 13. *Suppose that holds and
**
Then species and are extinct; that is,
*

*Proof. *From and Lemma 4, system (9) has a unique -periodic solution , and . By Lemma 3, we have ; therefore, .

Theorem 14. *Suppose that all the conditions of Theorem 11 hold and there exist positive constants and such that
**
Then system (3) has a unique positive T-periodic solution which is globally asymptotically stable.*

*Proof. *Let and be any two positive solutions of system (3); for any sufficiently small , from Theorem 11, there is a large enough such that for any , we have
Define the Lyapunov function as follows:
By the mean value theorem and (48), for any , , and , we have
where is suited between and , is suited between and , and . For , and the above small enough ; from conditions and , there exist positive constants and such that
Calculating the upper right derivative of , we obtain
In view of
substituting (53) and (54) into (52), we have
For all and , we have
Hence, is continuous for all . The above analysis shows that, for all ,
and we further have
It is obvious that as ; that is,
We further have
Choose constants and . By Theorem 11, we have
Now let us consider the , , and . It is compact in the domain , since and for all . Let be a limit point of this sequence ; then we have . In fact, since and as , we have
The sequence has a unique limit point; otherwise, let the sequence have two limit points and . Then, taking into account (60) and , we have
and hence ; the solution is the unique periodic solution of system (3). By (60), it is globally asymptotically stable. This completes the proof of Theorem 14.

#### 4. Numerical Simulations

In system (3), we take , , which means that system (3) is a one-period system with one impulse perturbation during one period.

In case 1, – are, respectively, equivalent to the following inequalities: Taking , , conditions and are, respectively, equivalent to the following inequalities: By calculation, conditions –, , and hold; from Theorem 11 and Theorem 14, system (3) is globally asymptotically stable. Numerical simulations of these results can be seen in Figure 1.

Figure 1 shows the dynamical behavior of the solutions with seven group initial values , , , , , , and , respectively. From Figure 1, we can obtain that there exists a unique positive periodic solution of system (3) such that any solution of system (3) with initial value tends to the positive periodic solution as .

In case 2, conditions and are, respectively, equivalent to the following inequalities: