Review Article

Desmosomes In Vivo

Figure 2

Epithelial cells retain junctional contact during cell division. (a) and (b) MDCK cells stained with monoclonal antibody to desmoplakin by the ABC technique and counterstained with haematoxylin. (a) Cells at various stages of division are shown: , anaphase; , telophase; , early cytokinesis; , advanced cytokinesis. All dividing cells show prominent peripheral staining for desmoplakin. In some cases (e.g., small arrowhead), the desmoplakin staining is punctate and not obviously confined to the cell periphery. However, similar staining is commonly seen in nondividing cells (e.g., large arrowhead) and appears to be due to oblique viewing of the cell interfaces. (b) High-power photographs of similar cell in advanced cytokinesis. Note the prominent peripheral desmoplakin staining, even at the borders of the cleavage furrow. Although the cytoplasm is generally more darkly staining than that of neighbouring non-dividing cells, this does not indicate desmosome internalisation (see following fluorescence micrographs). Bars: 20 m (a) and 10 m (b) (c)–(e) MDCK cells stained with monoclonal antibody to desmoplakin and propidium iodide to show chromosomes. (c) Two cells in metaphase, (d) cell in early anaphase, and (e) cell in late anaphase. All dividing cells show peripheral punctate staining for desmoplakin, comparable to that seen in non-dividing neighbours. However, no punctate staining indicative of desmosome internalisation is present in the cytoplasm of the dividing cells. Bar: 10 m. (f)–(i) MDCK cells stained with monoclonal antibody to tight junction protein ZO-1. (j)–(m) Corresponding phase-contrast images. The cell in (F,J) is in prophase, that in (g) and (k) in metaphase and those in the remaining pictures in telophase. Each dividing cell is surrounded by a complete ring of ZO-1 staining and shows no evidence of junction internalization or disruption. Dividing cells in epidermis and intestine also showed retention of junctions by electron microscopy. Bar: 10 m. Reproduced from the study by Baker and Garrod in [21].
212439.fig.002a
(a)
212439.fig.002b
(b)
212439.fig.002c
(c)
212439.fig.002d
(d)
212439.fig.002e
(e)
212439.fig.002f
(f)
212439.fig.002g
(g)
212439.fig.002h
(h)
212439.fig.002i
(i)
212439.fig.002j
(j)
212439.fig.002k
(k)
212439.fig.002l
(l)
212439.fig.002m
(m)