- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Dermatology Research and Practice
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 571516, 4 pages
Quality of Life in Iranian Patients with Acne
1Neurosciences Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman 7616914115, Iran
2Department of Dermatology, Afzalipour Medicine School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman 7616914115, Iran
3Medical Student Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman 7616914115, Iran
Received 20 July 2011; Accepted 30 November 2011
Academic Editor: Elizabeth Helen Kemp
Copyright © 2012 H. Safizadeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Acne is a chronic inflammatory disease of pilosebaceous units. Although the acne isnot a life threatening disease, studies have revealed that it has significant effect on self-image and quality of life. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the health-related quality of life in patients with acne in an Iranian context. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) were used for measuring quality of life, and severity of acne was measured by Global Acne Grading System (GAGS). The mean (±SD) of DLQI and CADI scores was 6.42 (±4.77) and 5.97 (±2.97), respectively. Acne influenced the quality of life in 51.8% of patients from moderate to very much, and the quality of life was affected by the severity of acne (P < 0.01). Since acne has significant effects on patient’s quality of life, the management of patients with acne requires more attention to different aspects of quality of life.
Acne vulgaris is the most common chronic inflammatory pilosebaceous disease that presents with formation of comedone, papule, pustule, and nodule. Lesions appear mostly on the face, but neck, chest, upper parts of back, and shoulders may also be involved. It is the most common dermatologic disease in adolescence and adulthood with similar incidence in both genders. The age peak of acne is 17 years old, and in 3% of males and 12% of females, it continues beyond twenty five, while some patients (1% of males and 5% of females) carry it into their forties .
This disease is often misunderstood as a simple puberty-related condition by common people and even medical community, while scientific evidence revealed that acne affects patients more than a simple dermatologic disease . It has been observed that social and psychological impacts of acne are sometimes so complicated that cause serious problems in patients’ body image, self-esteem, and socialization and even may lead to feel of anger . Although it is not a life threatening condition, studies have shown that it has serious effects on body image of affected individuals leading to anxiety, depression, and social dysfunction [4, 5]. It has been well recognized that in regard to social and psychological outcomes, acne is comparable with disabling diseases such as asthma, epilepsy, diabetes, back pain, or arthritis .
Dermatologic diseases affect patients’ life by causing pain, itching, disability in daily activities, psychic pressures (low self-esteem, nervousness), problems in social relationships, family problems, and treatment-related problems such as drugs side effects and imposed treatment costs and time . This is true for acne as well and affects patients’ quality of life. It specially has negative impact on emotions, interpersonal relationships, physical activities, social life, and professional statues . Therefore, attention to the quality of life of these patients is of a great importance. As in different cultures the impact of disease on quality of life differs , the aim of present study was to investigate the quality of life of patients with acne in an Iranian context.
2. Materials and Methods
In this cross-sectional study conducted in Kerman—the largest province of Iran—220 consecutive patients with acne vulgaris referred to the dermatology clinics of Kerman city were investigated. Patients with other types of acne were excluded from the study. This work was approved by Ethics Committee.
Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) was used to grade disease severity in patients . This grading system has six locations including five locations on the face (forehead, right cheek, left cheek, nose, and chin) and one on chest/back. For each location based on the surface area and distribution and density of pilosebaceous units, a factor was considered. Each of these six locations was graded separately from 0 to 40, and for measuring severity in each location, the factor was multiplied in the grade of that location and the final score was calculated by adding scores. Score of 1–18 was considered as mild acne, 19–30 as moderate, 31–38 as severe, and above 39 as very severe .
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)  and Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI)  were used to determine the quality of life of acne patients. DLQI is a general questionnaire for evaluation of quality of life in dermatology patients and is consisted of 10 questions about disease symptoms, feelings, daily activities, type of clothing, social or physical activities, exercise, job or education, interpersonal relationships, marriage relationships, and treatment. Its domain is from zero (without any effect on quality of life) to 30 (high effect on quality of life), and higher score shows worse quality of life. According to the score obtained through this instrument, the effect of disease on quality of life can be divided into 5 classes of without effect, low effect, moderate effect, high effect, and severe effect .
CADI questionnaire is specific for acne and contains 5 questions—relating to the last month—about feelings, interference with social life and interaction with the opposite gender, avoidance of public facilities, appearance of the skin, and perceived severity of disease status. Each question has 4 choices and is scored from 0 to 3 leading to the total score of 0–15. Higher score shows worse quality of life . The questionnaires were completed anonymously, after assuring the responders about the confidentially of the data and explaining the objectives of the research.
Both questionnaires have Persian equivalents with confirmed reliability and validity [13, 14]. Data gathered by questionnaires were analyzed using -test, ANOVA, Pearson coefficient of correlations, and through SPSS software with considering as statistically significant.
In the present work, 220 patients with acne were studied, of whom 181 (82.3%) were female. Mean ± SD age of patients was years and the youngest was 13 years old and the oldest was 33 years old. Mean disease duration was years and mean score of GAGS was . Based on acne severity classification, mild acne had the highest frequency (51.8%) (Table 1). Mean ± SD DLQI score was , and based on DLQI score classification, the impact of acne on quality of life was very much, much, and moderate in 114 patients (51.8%) and little or nothing in 106 (48.2%) patients (Figure 1). Mean score of CADI was ranging 0–14. Half of the subjects had CADI score of 6 or less.
In DLQI, the highest mean score was attained for disease symptom followed by feelings and emotions, and in CADI, body image has gained the highest mean score.
Statistical analysis showed significant difference in quality of life based on educational level, in a way that subjects with university degrees had better quality of life in comparison to other subjects () whereas there was no significant difference in quality of life based on gender and marital status.
There was significant positive relationship between disease severity (GAGS) and scores of DLQI and CADI (, , and , ), but no significant relationship was observed between the quality of life and the disease duration (Table 2).
The results of the present study show clear impact of acne on patients’ quality of life, and as it was mentioned acne had affected quality of life of 51.8% of subjects. The impact was very severe in 1.4%, severe in 16.8%, and moderate in 33.6% of the patients. CADI score was 5.97 in this study, while the results reported in similar studies in other countries are different. In Walker study in Scotland performed on students, mean score of DLQI and CADI has been, respectively, 1.7 and 1.9 . In Hanisah study on Malaysian students, maximum CADI score has been 13 with medium of 4 . Mean CADI score has been 2.56 in Law study in Hong Kong . The quality of life of patients was been better in all three mentioned studies in comparison to the present study. One of the reasons for this difference may be related to our sampling process, which was based on those referring to dermatology clinics. It is clear that those referring to a doctor for acne may have more sever disease and/or different illness behaviour than others. On the other hand, in Abdel-hafez study in Egypt mean DLQI score has been 11.9 and 15.0 in female and male subjects, respectively, that are worse in comparison to the results of our study . These differences may be due to the difference in disease severity, cultural differences, and also difference in individuals’ expectations.
There was not so strong relationship between quality of life (based on DLQI and CADI scores) and acne severity (based on GAGS). The results of other studies vary to some degree in this regard. While the relationship has been poor in Law study  and clear in Hanisha study , there has not been any relationship between the quality of life and disease severity in Yazici, Kokandi, and Ilgen studies [3, 18, 19]. It is definite that since quality of life is completely a subjective issue, the severity of lesions cannot determine the quality of life and some other factors are involved, such as social, personal, emotional, and school problems . In the present study, there was no significant relationship between quality of life and duration of diseases. This result emphasizes the point that the effect of acne on quality of life is independent of disease duration and is mostly dependent on personal characteristics and patients’ ability in accepting their disease and copying with its problems. The results of Kokandi study have been similar in this regard .
There was no significant difference in the quality of life based on gender that is similar to the results of Hanisha and Yazici studies [15, 18]. In Law study, quality of life has been better in males compared to females , while in Abdel-Hafez it has been the opposite .
Comparison of quality of life based on educational level showed better quality of life in those with higher educational levels that may be due to the social status of educated people enabling them to accept their disease and cope with its outcomes.
It is noteworthy to mention that this study may be affected by selection bias because our sampling framework was limited to dermatology clinics rather than general population. However, Acne vulgaris had a significant impact on Iranian patients’ quality of life. Clinician must consider the psychosocial impact of acne in addition to pharmacological treatment.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
This paper was conducted in Kerman Medical University.
- S. Purdy and D. DeBerker, “Acne vulgaris,” Clinical Evidence, vol. 2008, pp. 1714–1748, 2008.
- S. Hanna, J. Sharma, and J. Klotz, “Acne vulgaris: more than skin deep,” Dermatology Online Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 8, 2003.
- A. Kokandi, “Evaluation of acne quality of life and clinical severity in acne female adults,” Dermatology Research and Practice, vol. 2010, Article ID 410809, 3 pages, 2010.
- D. R. Thomas, “Psychosocial effects of acne,” Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, vol. 8, supplement 4, pp. 3–5, 2004.
- V. Niemeier, J. Kupfer, and U. Gieler, “Acne vulgaris—psychosomatic aspects,” Journal of the German Society of Dermatology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1027–1036, 2006.
- E. Mallon, J. N. Newton, A. Klassen, S. L. Stewart-Brown, T. J. Ryan, and A. Y. Finlay, “The quality of life in acne: a comparison with general medical conditions using generic questionnaires,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 672–676, 1999.
- A. Jayaprakasam, A. Darvay, G. Osborne, and D. McGibbon, “Comparison of assessments of severity and quality of life in cutaneous disease,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 306–308, 2002.
- N. Walker and M. S. Lewis-Jones, “Quality of life and acne in Scottish adolescent schoolchildren: use of the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index© (CDLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Indexγopy; (CADI),” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2006.
- J. Yun, C. H. Kateralis, A. Weerasinghe, et al., “Impact of chronic urticaria on the quality of life in Australian and Sri Lankan populations,” Asia Pacific Allergy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2011.
- A. Doshi, A. Zaheer, and M. J. Stiller, “A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 416–418, 1997.
- A. Y. Finlay and G. K. Khan, “Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): a simple practical measure for routine clinical use,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 210–216, 1994.
- R. J. Motley and A. Y. Finlay, “Practical use of a disability index in the routine management of acne,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 1992.
- S. Aghaei, M. Sodaifi, P. Jafari, N. Mazharinia, and A. Y. Finlay, “DLQ1 scores in vitiligo: reliability and validity of the Persian version,” BMC Dermatology, vol. 4, article 8, 2004.
- S. Aghaei, N. Mazharinia, P. Japari, and Z. Abbasfard, “The Persian version of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index: reliability and validity study,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 80–82, 2006.
- A. Hanisah, K. Omar, and S. A. Shah, “Prevalence of acne and its impact on the quality of life in school-aged adolescents in Malaysia,” Journal of Primary Health Care, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2009.
- M. P. M. Law, A. A. T. Chuh, A. Lee, and N. Molinari, “Acne prevalence and beyond: acne disability and its predictive factors among Chinese late adolescents in Hong Kong,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2010.
- K. Abdel-Hafez, A. M. Mahran, E. R. M. Hofny, K. A. Mohammed, A. M. Darweesh, and A. A. Aal, “The impact of acne vulgaris on the quality of life and psychologic status in patients from upper Egypt,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 280–285, 2009.
- K. Yazici, K. Baz, A. E. Yazici et al., “Disease-specific quality of life is associated with anxiety and depression in patients with acne,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 435–439, 2004.
- E. Ilgen and A. Derya, “There is no correlation between acne severity and AQOLS/DLQI scores,” Journal of Dermatology, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 705–710, 2005.