Actinic Keratosis Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Appraisal of Quality

Table 2

Clinical practice guideline scores.

Guideline	Mean scores (% [SD])						Overall assessment (%, [SD])	Raters that would recommend,; raters
	(1) Scope and purpose	(2) Stakeholder involvement	(3) Rigor of development	(4) Clarity of presentation	(5) Applicability	(6) Editorial independence		Yes	Yes, with modifications
Drake et al. [10]	33.3 11.1	35.2 8.5	16.7 7.3	31.5 8.5	6.9 4.8	11.1 12.7	5.6 9.6	0	0
CCA/CAN [11]	81.5 3.2	96.3 3.2	92.6 20.1	75.9 23.1	68.1 18.8	80.6 12.7	77.8 9.6	2	1
de Berker et al. [12]	35.2 21.0	31.5 30.6	52.8 11.1	70.4 13.9	31.9 23.7	33.3 36.3	38.9 25.5	1	2
Stockfleth and Kerl (2006) [13]	53.7 17.9	29.6 3.2	69.4 18.2	29.6 13.9	20.8 11.0	38.9 19.2	27.8 25.5	1	2
Stockfleth et al. (2008) [14]	87.0 8.5	51.9 32.6	47.2 12.1	59.3 21.0	31.9 8.7	8.3 8.3	27.8 9.6	0	2
Stockfleth et al. (2011) [15]	24.1 8.5	16.7 0	35.2 8.0	35.2 11.6	13.9 2.4	44.4 4.8	33.3 16.7	0	2
Rossi et al. [16]	37.0 28.0	18.5 17.9	24.1 11.2	55.6 30.9	26.4 8.7	8.3 14.4	22.2 25.5	0	1
Mean score for domain	50.2 27.2	39.9 30.3	48.3 27.4	51.1 24.1	28.6 21.7	32.1 29.1	33.3 26.4

SD = standard deviation.