Review Article
Actinic Keratosis Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Appraisal of Quality
Table 2
Clinical practice guideline scores.
|
Guideline | Mean scores (% [SD]) |
Overall assessment (%, [SD]) |
Raters that would recommend, raters | (1) Scope and purpose | (2) Stakeholder involvement | (3) Rigor of development | (4) Clarity of presentation | (5) Applicability | (6) Editorial independence | Yes | Yes, with modifications |
| Drake et al. [10] | 33.3 11.1 | 35.2 8.5 | 16.7 7.3 | 31.5 8.5 | 6.9 4.8 | 11.1 12.7 | 5.6 9.6 | 0 | 0 | CCA/CAN [11] | 81.5 3.2 | 96.3 3.2 | 92.6 20.1 | 75.9 23.1 | 68.1 18.8 | 80.6 12.7 | 77.8 9.6 | 2 | 1 | de Berker et al. [12] | 35.2 21.0 | 31.5 30.6 | 52.8 11.1 | 70.4 13.9 | 31.9 23.7 | 33.3 36.3 | 38.9 25.5 | 1 | 2 | Stockfleth and Kerl (2006) [13] | 53.7 17.9 | 29.6 3.2 | 69.4 18.2 | 29.6 13.9 | 20.8 11.0 | 38.9 19.2 | 27.8 25.5 | 1 | 2 | Stockfleth et al. (2008) [14] | 87.0 8.5 | 51.9 32.6 | 47.2 12.1 | 59.3 21.0 | 31.9 8.7 | 8.3 8.3 | 27.8 9.6 | 0 | 2 | Stockfleth et al. (2011) [15] | 24.1 8.5 | 16.7 0 | 35.2 8.0 | 35.2 11.6 | 13.9 2.4 | 44.4 4.8 | 33.3 16.7 | 0 | 2 | Rossi et al. [16] | 37.0 28.0 | 18.5 17.9 | 24.1 11.2 | 55.6 30.9 | 26.4 8.7 | 8.3 14.4 | 22.2 25.5 | 0 | 1 |
| Mean score for domain | 50.2 27.2 | 39.9 30.3 | 48.3 27.4 | 51.1 24.1 | 28.6 21.7 | 32.1 29.1 | 33.3 26.4 | | |
|
|
SD = standard deviation.
|