Review Article

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Achalasia: An Analysis

Table 1

Clinical trials evaluating POEM for the management of achalasia.

Authors Study design Patients
 ( )
 Myotomy
length; mean
(range), cm
Dysphagia scoreEckardt score  LES pressure; mean
(range), mm Hg
 GERD
symptoms
Follow-up; mean (range)
Baseline; meanPost-POEM; mean ( , %)Baseline; meanPost-POEM; mean ( , %)BaselinePost-POEM

Inoue et al. [13]Single-center
prospective
178.1 (3–15)101.3
(17, 100%)
N/AN/A52.4
(14.2–80.5)
19.8
(9.3–42.7)
N/A5 (1–16) months
Swanström et al. [14]Single-center
prospective
510 (10–13)N/A0 or 1
(5, 100%)
N/AN/A36.5
(9.9– 39.8)
N/AN/A2 weeks
von Renteln et al. [15]Single-center
prospective
1612 (8–17)N/AN/AN/A≤3 (15, 94%)27.211.8None3 months
Costamagna et al. [16]Single-center
prospective
1110.2 ± 2.8N/AN/A7.11.1 (11, 100%)45.116.9None3 months
Chiu et al. [17]Single-center
prospective
1610.82
(range 0–2)
0
(range 0-1)
5.5
(range 0–8)
0
(range 0–3)
(16, 100%)
43.6 ± 24.429.8 ± 221/16
(6.25%)
176.5 (98–230) days
Hungness et al. [21]Single-center
retrospective
189 (6–14)N/AN/A7
(range 5–12)
1
(range 0–9)
(18, 100%)
19 (7–51)9 (0–23)4/18 (22%) based on GerdQ score ≥76 (1–18) months
Zhou et al. [24]Single-center
prospective
1210.1 (8–13)N/AN/A≤3
(11, 91.7%)
29.4
(23.5–40.2)
13.5
(8.6–22.5)
1/12 (8.3%)10.4 (5–14) months
Verlaan et al. [18]Single-center
prospective
10N/AN/AN/A8
(range 4–8)
1
(range 0-1)
(10, 100%)
20.5
(15.8–24.3)
6.8
(4.0–12.0)
3/10 (30%)3 months
Minami et al. [20]Single-center
retrospective
2814.4 (10–18)N/AN/A6.7
(range 2–12)
0.7
(range 0–3)
(28; 100%)
71.2
(35.8–119.0)
21.0
(6.7–41.0)
6/28 (21.4%)16 (3–28) months
Lee et al. [19]Single-center prospective138.5 (6–13)N/AN/A6.4
(range 4–10)
0.4
(range 0–2)
(13; 100%)
30.3
(14.4–57.1)
15.3
(9.6–22.3)
N/A6.9 (1–14) months
Von Renteln et al. [22]Multicenter prospective7013 (5–13)N/AN/A≤3
(68, 97%)
at 3 months
27.6
(24.2–31.0)
8.9
(7.3–10.5)
37%10.1 (3–12) months

N/A: not available.