About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 7 (2010), Issue 1, Pages 29-32
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nen051
Commentary

Geffen Faculty Highlight Concerns Linking CAIM and Conventional Researchers at UCLA Symposium

UCLA Center for East West Medicine, 2428 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 208, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA

Received 12 June 2008; Accepted 20 June 2008

Copyright © 2010 Elizabeth H. Logue. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

David Geffen School of Medicine faculty, representing a wide range of disciplines, engaged speakers nationally known for their expertise on complementary, alternative and integrative medicine (CAIM) and its investigation at a January, 2008 symposium on the campus of the University of California, Los Angeles. The forum was created to educate the UCLA Institutional Review Board (IRB), and lively participation by School of Medicine faculty helped bring IRB members up to speed on controversies surrounding CAIM research. The symposium demonstrated that academics who are neither proponents nor detractors of CAIM can facilitate cross talk between opposing camps, elucidating questions important to its evaluation by those charged with protecting research subjects. It also brought attention to the universality of quandaries facing CAIM investigators and to the ingenuity with which they have addressed many of them.