About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 295494, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neq013
Commentary

Methylglyoxal—A Potential Risk Factor of Manuka Honey in Healing of Diabetic Ulcers

Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia
Department of Microbiology, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia

Received 16 November 2009; Accepted 31 January 2010

Copyright © 2011 Juraj Majtan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Honey has been considered as a remedy in wound healing since ancient times. However, as yet, there are inadequate supportive robust randomized trials and experimental data to fully accept honey as an effective medical product in wound care. Manuka honey has been claimed to have therapeutic advantages over other honeys. Recently, it has been documented that the pronounced antibacterial activity of manuka honey is due, at least in part, to reactive methylglyoxal (MG). The concentration of MG in manuka honeys is up to 100-fold higher than in conventional honeys. MG is a potent protein-glycating agent and an important precursor of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). MG and AGEs play a role in the pathogenesis of impaired diabetic wound healing and can modify the structure and function of target molecules. This commentary describes the concern that MG in manuka honey may delay wound healing in diabetic patients. Further detailed research is needed to fully elucidate the participation of honey/derived MG in healing diabetic ulcers. We advocate randomized controlled trials to determine efficacy and safety of manuka honey in this population.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes is rapidly increasing worldwide. The occurrence of diabetic foot ulcers is a serious complication which negatively affects patients’ quality of life. Among persons diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, the prevalence of foot ulcers is 4%–10% [1]. Treatment of foot ulcers is protracted and intensive and associated with high costs. Various approaches have been developed for the treatment of diabetic ulcers including topical wound-care therapies.

Current therapeutic products which are being used widely in wound care, such as silver sulfadiazine, hydrogel, hydrocolloid and alginate dressings impregnated with silver, are generally accepted as being useful for control of bacterial infections. Increased use of ionic silver in wound care has created some concern regarding the development of bacterial resistance [2, 3]. Silver resistance has already been documented in bacterial isolates including Escherichia coli [4], Enterobacter cloacae [4], Klebsiella pneumonie [4], Salmonella typhimurium [5] and Acinetobacter baumani [6].

With increasing frequency, modern medicine directs attention to natural products with antimicrobial activity and their use in clinical practice. The major arguments for implementing natural products such as honey, aloe vera or curcumin are the low cost and absence of antimicrobial resistance risk in comparison with conventional wound-care products. Moreover, some of the natural therapies such as maggot debridement therapy and phage therapy have recently been reexamined for their potential usefulness in the treatment of wounds that are difficult to heal [710].

2. Honey as a Traditional Antimicrobial Agent

Historically, honey has been used in the treatment of a broad spectrum of wounds. It is well documented that honey can act as an antimicrobial and antioxidative agent as well as an immunomodulator with both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects [1115] (Figure 1). Recent research has concentrated on the antimicrobial activity of different types of honey rather than its effect on wound healing [1620]. Honey derived from the floral source of Leptospermum spp. (manuka) has been claimed to have therapeutic advantages over other honeys [2123]. Manuka honeys exhibit notable antimicrobial activity which cannot be attributed to the peroxide present [24, 25]. It has been documented that the pronounced antibacterial activity of manuka honey directly originates from the methylglyoxal (MG) it contains [26, 27]. Honey derived from this specific plant in New Zealand and Australia gave rise to Medihoney—widely used medical honey. George and Cutting [28] compared the sensitivity of 130 clinical isolates to this medical honey. They demonstrated that manuka honey is effective against a broad range of microorganisms including multi-resistant strains [28]. In a very recent study it has been reported that manuka honey has antimicrobial activity against clinical isolates of Campylobacter spp. [29]. Along with MG, the hydrogen peroxide, flavonoids as well as aromatic acids present in natural honeys also act as antimicrobial substances.

295494.fig.001
Figure 1: Main properties of manuka honey in the treatment of diabetic ulcers. The black arrow represents known action, the white arrows represent hypothetical mechanisms of action. MG: methylglyoxal; AGEs: advanced glycation end products; MRJP1: major royal jelly protein 1.

3. Clinical Evidence for the Use of Honey in the Management of Chronic Wounds

The findings of animal studies and of several randomized clinical trials involving more than 2000 participants have provided compelling evidence that honey can accelerate wound healing [22]. On the other hand, the quality of reported trials is variable and evidence to date supports honey only as a treatment of mild-to-moderate superficial and partial thickness burns [30]. Authors of a recent systematic review assert that there is insufficient evidence to guide clinical practice for other wound types [30]. Jull and co-workers established that honey-impregnated dressings did not significantly improve venous ulcer healing at 12 weeks compared with usual care [31]. Moreover, these dressings did not significantly improve time to healing, change in ulcer area, incidence of infection or quality of life. On the other hand, two very recent clinical trials suggest that healing times and incidence of infection after treatment with honey are reduced compared to conventional treatment, and the results are of clinical significance [32, 33]. The main limitation of above two trials is that patient numbers recruited for inclusion were insufficient to reach statistical significance.

Manuka honey is the type of honey most often studied in randomized controlled studies. Six trials (n = 701) [3136] recruited participants with chronic wounds, three of which recruited participants with leg ulcers [3133]. In all three trials manuka honey dressing was used. The participants with history of diabetes were excluded from two trials [31, 33]. Although, diabetic participants with venous ulcers were not excluded in the remaining trial [32], the effect of manuka honey in the treatment of ulcers in patients with diabetes was not specifically examined.

Non-manuka honey was recently compared to povidone iodine in the treatment of Wagner type II diabetic foot ulcers [37]. Ulcer healing was not significantly different in both groups and the authors deduced that honey dressing represents a safe alternative dressing for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. In addition, Eddy and Gideonsen [38] reported a case where ordinary honey was applied to patient’s heel and forefoot diabetic ulcers in order to avoid the leg amputation. Granulation tissue appeared within 2 weeks and the ulcers healed in 6–12 months.

The effect of different honey on healing has not been compared in vivo in either the animal or the human model. It would be interesting to compare effectiveness of several types of honey in randomized controlled clinical trials recruiting participants with diabetic ulcers. It has been described that the Slovak forest honey has comparable antibacterial activity to manuka honey against nosocomial and skin pathogens in vitro [20].

4. Methylglyoxal Concentrations in Honey

MG and other dicarbonyls have been identified in a range of foods and beverages, including wine [39], beer [39], bread [40], soya [41] and honey [42]. MG in manuka honeys is derived from the non-enzymatic conversion of dihydroxyacetone which occurs at high levels in the nectar [42]. Freshly produced manuka honey contained low levels of MG (139–491 mg kg-1) but during storage at 37°C its content increased. The levels of MG in multi-floral honeys are low, ranging from 0.4 to 5.4 mg kg-1 [43]. In two studies, high levels of MG were reported in manuka honeys ranging from 48 to 743 mg kg-1 [27] and 189 to 835 mg kg-1 [44], respectively. It has been suggested that concentrations of MG above 150 mg kg-1 are directly responsible for the characteristic antibacterial properties of manuka honey [44].

5. Biological Properties of MG and AGEs

The 1,2-dicarbonyl compounds, including MG, glyoxal and 3-deoxyglucosone, are generated either endogenously by cell metabolism, glucose oxidation and lipid peroxidation or by degradation of carbohydrates in foods and beverages. Highly reactive dicarbonyls attack the lysine, arginine (Arg) and cysteine residues of long-lived proteins, such as collagens, to form irreversible AGEs causing changes in collagen pathophysiology that result in disruption of normal collagen matrix remodeling [45].

AGEs are complex, heterogenous molecules that cause protein cross-linking, exhibit browning and generate fluorescence [46]. Not all AGEs have been identified and the mechanisms underlying their formation remain unclear. AGEs exert their actions either directly or through a receptor system that includes two types of cell-surface AGE receptors [47, 48]. It has been found that a large portion of AGEs and their precursors in the body are derived from exogenous sources [49, 50].

MG-induced modifications of Arg residues in collagen could be a key factor in the impaired degradation of collagen that promotes fibrosis in chronic tissue infections [51]. Interestingly, MG increased the apparent molecular weight of collagen, which is suggestive of increased collagen cross-linking [45]. MG also changes the structure and function of many important immunological proteins and enzymes, and reduces the efficiency of peripheral blood immune-cell response [52]. The administration of MG to rats induced severe negative changes in cutaneous vessels, suggesting decreased peripheral perfusion by an impaired microcirculation [53]. Furthermore, authors observed that ulcers in MG-treated rats failed to provide actively migrating cells from peripheral regions.

Treatment of early-passage human skin fibroblasts with 400  M of MG results in accelerated aging and the appearance of the senescent phenotype [54].

6. The Roles of MG and AGEs in Impairment of Diabetic Wound Healing

The scope of MG damage in diabetes is huge, because MG is able to form adducts on protein, lipoproteins and DNAs at any site where its concentration is high. It has also been suggested that MG glycation could be a link between diabetes and infection susceptibility [52]. MG-induced immune damage might provide a link between hyperglycemia and diabetes-related infection risk [52].

Data from recent experimental studies indicate that not only MG but also AGEs may play a role in the pathogenesis of impaired diabetic wound healing and might have separate consequences for immunity [5458]. Increased AGE accumulation, along with expression of their receptors, are associated with formation of diabetic atheromatous lesions, triggering their destabilization, impairing ischemia-induced neovascularization and formation of collateral circulation, expanding vessel extracellular matrix, and disrupting the expression of endothelial nitrous oxide synthetase [47, 48, 58, 59].

The accumulation of AGEs in the extracellular matrix causes aberrant cross-linking, resulting in decreased vessel elasticity. It has also been shown that keratinocyte migration is inhibited by AGEs accumulation under high-glucose conditions [60]. In diabetes, AGEs can enhance the activity of neutrophils, with change in cellular biological behaviors which might be one of the main reasons responsible for chronic inflammation [61]. The sustained inflammatory response occurs following interaction of AGEs with their receptors and release of pro-inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor α and production of destructive matrix metalloproteinases which limit wound closure [56]. In addition, Goova et al. [56] have demonstrated that blocking receptors for AGEs restores impaired wound healing in diabetic mice.

7. Conclusion

A number of randomized clinical trials suggest that medical grade honey promotes wound healing but most of them have not included diabetic patients with chronic leg ulcers and nearly three-quarters of clinical trials have focused on the use of honey for acute wounds, in particular burns. In general, repair of tissue damage in diabetic foot disease is accompanied with several pathophysiological mechanisms. Since manuka honey contains high levels of MG, we speculate that patients with diabetes may be at risk due to either the direct negative effect of MG on cells and components in the wound or the indirect formation of AGEs, which could impair the wound-healing process.

We believe that honey is an effective alternative dressing for treatment of many types of chronic wounds. However, MG may have a detrimental effect on diabetic ulcers. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the effect of honey-derived MG in the treatment of diabetic ulcers. In addition, honeys with varying levels of MG should be subjected to randomized comparative clinical trials in treatment of diabetic ulcers.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Dr. Nora Majtanova from St. Cyril and Method’s Hospital (Bratislava, Slovakia) for reading the manuscript and for her valuable comments.

References

  1. N. Singh, D. G. Armstrong, and B. A. Lipsky, “Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes,” JAMA, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. 217–228, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. S. L. Percival, E. Woods, M. Nutekpor, P. Bowler, A. Radford, and C. Cochrane, “Feature: prevalence of silver resistance in bacteria isolated from diabetic foot ulcers and efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings,” Ostomy Wound Management, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 30–40, 2008. View at Scopus
  3. J. V. Loh, S. L. Percival, E. J. Woods, N. J. Williams, and C. A. Cochrane, “Silver resistance in MRSA isolated from wound and nasal sources in humans and animals,” International Wound Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. A. T. Hendry and I. O. Stewart, “Silver-resistant enterobacteriaceae from hospital patients,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 915–921, 1979. View at Scopus
  5. G. L. McHugh, R. C. Moellering, C. C. Hopkins, and M. N. Swarz, “Salmonella typhimurium resistance to silver nitrate, chloramphenicol, and ampicillin,” The Lancet, vol. 1, pp. 235–240, 1975.
  6. L. M. Deshpande and B. A. Chopade, “Plasmid mediated silver resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii,” BioMetals, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 1994. View at Scopus
  7. D. D. Rhoads, R. D. Wolcott, M. A. Kuskowski, B. M. Wolcott, L. S. Ward, and A. Sulakvelidze, “Bacteriophage therapy of venous leg ulcers in humans: results of a phase I safety trial,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 237–243, 2009. View at Scopus
  8. P. Steenvoorde, C. E. Jacobi, L. Van Doorn, and J. Oskam, “Maggot debridement therapy of infected ulcers: patient and wound factors influencing outcome—a study on 101 patients with 117 wounds,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 596–602, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Nigam, A. Bexfield, S. Thomas, and N. A. Ratcliffe, “Maggot therapy: the science and implication for CAM Part I—history and bacterial resistance,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 223–227, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Nigam, A. Bexfield, S. Thomas, and N. A. Ratcliffe, “Maggot therapy: the science and implication for CAM part II—maggots combat infection,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 303–308, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. A. J. Tonks, R. A. Cooper, K. P. Jones, S. Blair, J. Parton, and A. Tonks, “Honey stimulates inflammatory cytokine production from monocytes,” Cytokine, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 242–247, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Majtán, E. Kováčová, K. Bíliková, and J. Šimúth, “The immunostimulatory effect of the recombinant apalbumin 1-major honeybee royal jelly protein-on TNFα release,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 269–278, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. A. J. van den Berg, E. van den Worm, H. C. van Ufford, S. B. Halkes, M. J. Hoekstra, and C. J. Beukelman, “An in vitro examination of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of buckwheat honey,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 172–178, 2008. View at Scopus
  14. A. Ahmad, R. A. Khan, and M. A. Mesaik, “Anti inflammatory effect of natural honey on bovine thrombin-induced oxidative burst in phagocytes,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 801–808, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. J. Majtan, P. Kumar, T. Majtan, A. F. Walls, and J. Klaudiny, “Effect of honey and its major royal jelly protein 1 on cytokine and MMP-9 mRNA transcripts in human keratinocytes,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. e73–e79, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. N. J. Basson and S. R. Grobler, “Antimicrobial activity of two South African honeys produced from indigenous Leucospermum cordifolium and Erica species on selected micro-organisms,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 8, article 41, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. L. Estevinho, A. P. Pereira, L. Moreira, L. G. Dias, and E. Pereira, “Antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of phenolic compounds extracts of Northeast Portugal honey,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3774–3779, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. P. H. S. Kwakman, J. P. C. van den Akker, A. Güçlü et al., “Medical-grade honey kills antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vitro and eradicates skin colonization,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1677–1682, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. H. T. Tan, R. A. Rahman, S. H. Gan et al., “The antibacterial properties of Malaysian tualang honey against wound and enteric microorganisms in comparison to manuka honey,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 9, article no. 1472, p. 34, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. J. Majtan and V. Majtan, “Is manuka honey the best type of honey for wound care?” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 305–306, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. P. E. Lusby, A. L. Coombes, and J. M. Wilkinson, “Bactericidal activity of different honeys against pathogenic bacteria,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 464–467, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. P. C. Molan, “The evidence supporting the use of honey as a wound dressing,” International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–54, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. A. Simon, K. Traynor, K. Santos, G. Blaser, U. Bode, and P. Molan, “Medical honey for wound carestill the latest ‘resort’,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 165–173, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. K. L. Allen, P. C. Molan, and G. M. Reid, “A survey of the antibacterial activity of some New Zealand honeys,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 817–822, 1991. View at Scopus
  25. K. M. Russell, P. C. Molan, A. L. Wilkins, and P. T. Holland, “Identification of some antibacterial constituents of New Zealand manuka honey,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 10–13, 1990. View at Scopus
  26. C. J. Adams, C. H. Boult, B. J. Deadman et al., “Isolation by HPLC and characterisation of the bioactive fraction of New Zealand manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 343, no. 4, pp. 651–659, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  27. E. Mavric, S. Wittmann, G. Barth, and T. Henle, “Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand,” Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 483–489, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. N. M. George and K. F. Cutting, “Antibacterial honey (MedihoneyTM): in vitro activity against clinical isolates of MRSA, VRE and other multiresistant Gram-negative organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Wounds, vol. 19, pp. 231–236, 2007.
  29. S. M. Lin, P. C. Molan, and R. T. Cursons, “The in vitro susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. to the antibacterial effect of manuka honey,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 339–344, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. A. B. Jull, A. Rodgers, and N. Walker, “Honey as a topical treatment for wounds,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD005083, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  31. A. Jull, N. Walker, V. Parag, P. Molan, and A. Rodgers, “Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 175–182, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. G. Gethin and S. Cowman, “Manuka honey vs. hydrogel—a prospective, open label, multicentre, randomised contolled trial to compare desloughing efficacy and healing outcomes in venous ulcers,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 18, pp. 466–474, 2008.
  33. V. Robson, S. Dodd, and S. Thomas, “Standardized antibacterial honey (Medihoney) with standard therapy in wound care: randomized clinical trial,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 565–575, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  34. S. M. Weheida, H. H. Nagubib, H. M. El-Banna, and S. Marzouk, “Comparing the effects of two dressing techniques on healing of low grade pressure ulcers,” Journal of Medical Research Institute, vol. 12, pp. 259–278, 1991.
  35. N. S. Al-Waili and K. Y. Sallom, “Effects of topical honey on post-operative wounds infections due to gram positive and gram negative bacteria following caesarean sections and hysterectomies,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 4, pp. 126–130, 1999.
  36. M. Subrahmanyam and S. P. Ugane, “Honey dressing beneficial in treatment of Fournier's gangrene,” Indian Journal of Surgery, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 75–77, 2004. View at Scopus
  37. A. Shukrimi, A. R. Sulaiman, A. Y. Halim, and A. Azril, “A comparative study between honey and povidone iodine as dressing solution for Wagner type II diabetic foot ulcers,” Medical Journal of Malaysia, vol. 63, pp. 44–46, 2008.
  38. J. J. Eddy and M. D. Gideonsen, “Topical honey for diabetic foot ulcers,” Journal of Family Practice, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 533–535, 2005. View at Scopus
  39. A. Barros, J. A. Rodrigues, P. J. Almeida, and M. T. Oliva-Teles, “Determination of glyoxal, methylglyoxal, and diacetyl in selected beer and wine, by HPLC with UV spectrophotometric detection, after derivatization with o-phenylenediamine,” Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 2061–2069, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. Hayashi and T. Shibamoto, “Analysis of methyl glyoxal in foods and beverages,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1090–1093, 1985. View at Scopus
  41. M. Nagao, K. Wakabayashi, Y. Fujita, T. Tahira, M. Ochiai, and T. Sugimura, “Mutagenic compounds in soy sauce, Chinese cabbage, coffee and herbal teas,” Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, vol. 206, pp. 55–62, 1986. View at Scopus
  42. C. J. Adams, M. Manley-Harris, and P. C. Molan, “The origin of methylglyoxal in New Zealand manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 344, no. 8, pp. 1050–1053, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. K. U. Weigel, T. Opitz, and T. Henle, “Studies on the occurrence and formation of 1,2-dicarbonyls in honey,” European Food Research and Technology, vol. 218, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Atrott and T. Henle, “Methylglyoxal in manuka honey—correlation with antibacterial properties,” Czech Journal of Food Sciences, vol. 27, pp. S163–S165, 2009. View at Scopus
  45. S. Sassi-Gaha, D. T. Loughlin, F. Kappler et al., “Two dicarbonyl compounds, 3-deoxyglucosone and methylglyoxal, differentially modulate dermal fibroblasts,” Matrix Biology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  46. W. Cai, Q. D. Gao, M. Peppa, C. He, and H. Vlasara, “Oxidative stress-inducing carbonyl compounds from common foods: novel mediators of cellular dysfunction,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 8, pp. 337–346, 2002.
  47. H. Vlassara, “Advanced glycation in health and disease: role of the modern environment,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1043, pp. 452–460, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  48. M. Peppa and H. Vlassara, “Advanced glycation end products and diabetic complications: a general overview,” Hormones, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2005. View at Scopus
  49. I. D. Nicholl, A. W. Stitt, J. E. Moore, A. J. Ritchie, D. B. Archer, and R. Bucala, “Increased levels of advanced glycation endproducts in the lenses and blood vessels of cigarette smokers,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 594–601, 1998. View at Scopus
  50. T. Goldberg, W. Cai, M. Peppa et al., “Advanced glycoxidation end products in commonly consumed foods,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 1287–1291, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  51. S. A. C. Chong, W. Lee, P. D. Arora et al., “Methylglyoxal inhibits the binding step of collagen phagocytosis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 11, pp. 8510–8520, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  52. C. L. Price and S. C. Knight, “Methylglyoxal: possible link between hyperglycaemia and immune suppression?” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 20, pp. 312–317, 2009.
  53. J. Berlanga, D. Cibrian, I. Guillén et al., “Methylglyoxal administration induces diabetes-like microvascular changes and perturbs the healing process of cutaneous wounds,” Clinical Science, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 83–95, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  54. H. Sejersen and S. I. S. Rattan, “Dicarbonyl-induced accelerated aging in vitro in human skin fibroblasts,” Biogerontology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  55. A. D. Bhatwadekar, J. V. Glenn, G. Li, T. M. Curtis, T. A. Gardiner, and A. W. Stitt, “Advanced glycation of fibronectin impairs vascular repair by endothelial progenitor cells: implications for vasodegeneration in diabetic retinopathy,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 49, pp. 1232–1241, 2008.
  56. M. T. Goova, J. Li, T. Kislinger, et al., “Blockade of receptor for advanced glycation endproducts restores effective wound healing in diabetic mice,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 1159, pp. 513–525, 2001.
  57. M. Peppa, H. Brem, P. Ehrlich et al., “Adverse effects of dietary glycotoxins on wound healing in genetically diabetic mice,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2805–2813, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. Vlassara and M. R. Palace, “Diabetes and advanced glycation endproducts,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 87–101, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. Peppa, P. Stavroulakis, and S. A. Raptis, “Advanced glycoxidation products and impaired diabetic wound healing,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 461–472, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  60. Z.-Q. Song, R.-X. Wang, D.-M. Yu et al., “Impact of advanced glycosylation end products-modified human serum albumin on migration of epidermal keratinocytes: an in vitro experiment,” National Medical Journal of China, vol. 88, no. 38, pp. 2690–2694, 2008. View at Scopus
  61. W. Dong, T. Xie, J.-Y. Dong et al., “Effects of advanced glycosylation end products on the biological behavior of neutrophils,” Chinese Journal of Burns, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 9–12, 2008. View at Scopus