Research Article

Body Mass Index and Facial Cues in Sasang Typology for Young and Elderly Persons

Table 4

BMI and facial metrics in association with TE types: logistic regression analysis.

Comparison unitM20sM60sF20sF60s
OR (CI 95%) statisticOR (CI 95%) statisticOR (CI 95%)c statisticOR (CI 95%) statistic

BMI11.63 (1.42–1.88)0.811.52 (1.33–1.74)0.781.62 (1.39–1.89)0.771.79 (1.51–2.11)0.82
PAR0.002sd0.61 (0.46–0.81)0.630.91 (0.70–1.20)0.530.75 (0.57–0.99)0.580.72 (0.54–0.95)0.58
WHR0.14sd1.60 (1.21–2.12)0.641.74 (1.28– 2.35)0.651.28 (0.98–1.67)0.571.04 (0.8–1.35)0.54
CJWR0.05sd0.45 (0.33–0.63)0.690.35 (0.24–0.51)0.740.59 (0.44–0.80)0.640.52 (0.38–0.70)0.67
Eye size11.22 (1.05–1.42)0.601.18 (1.03– 1.35)0.611.13 (0.96–1.32)0.561.09 (0.96–1.25)0.55
LF-FH0.02sd1.27 (0.98–1.66)0.561.09 (0.83–1.43)0.531.42 (1.08–1.86)0.601.57 (1.19–2.07)0.62
FW-LF0.06sd1.29 (0.99–1.69)0.581.30 (0.98–1.71)0.570.82 (0.63–1.07)0.450.95 (0.73–1.24)0.48
EH mean11.03 (0.9–1.19)0.511.03 (0.94–1.13)0.520.99 (0.86–1.13)0.511.08 (0.98–1.18)0.57

M20s: male-twenties group; F20s: female-twenties group; M60s: male-sixties group; F60s: female-sixties group.
sdThe comparison unit was adjusted to be close to the standard deviation of each potential predictive factors.