Review Article

Vitamin E and the Healing of Bone Fracture: The Current State of Evidence

Table 3

Quality of methods and results reported in animal studies included in the review (based upon ARRIVE Guidelines).

Section Item in ARRIVE ARRIVE Guidelines recommendationStatus in article (if described: +; if not described satisfactorily: commentary was given)
Kurklu et al. [15]Shuid et al. [18]Paskalev et al. [8]Turk et al. [21]Durak et al. [23]Sarisözen et al. [24]

Methods

Ethical statement5Indicate the nature of the ethical review permissions, relevant licences (e.g., Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986), and national or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals, that cover the research++++++

Study design6For each experiment, give brief details of the study design including the following
6aThe number of experimental and control groups++++++
6bAny steps taken to minimise the effects of subjective bias when allocating animals to treatment (e.g., randomisation procedure) and when assessing results (e.g., if performed, describe who was blinded and when)+Randomization was not described for the allocation of sham groupNot describedNo blinding procedure was describedNot describedNot described
6cThe experimental unit (e.g., a single animal, group, or cage of animals)++++++

Experimental procedures7For each experiment and each experimental group, including controls, provide precise details of all procedures carried out. For example:
7aHow (e.g., drug formulation and dose, site and route of administration, anaesthesia and analgesia used (including monitoring), surgical procedure, method of euthanasia). Provide details of any specialist equipment used, including supplier(s)The full formulation of -tocopherol was not describedMethod of euthanasia was not described
The supplier of the fracture device was not reported
+Method of euthanasia was not described+Methods of analgesia and euthanasia were not described
7bWhen (e.g., time of day)Not describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot described
7cWhere (e.g., home cage, laboratory, water maze)++Not described++Not described
7dWhy (e.g., rationale for choice of specific anaesthetic, route of administration, drug dose used)Not describedNot described+Not describedNot describedNot described

Experimental animals8
8aProvide details of the animals used, including species, strain, sex, developmental stage (e.g., mean or median age plus age range), and weight (e.g. mean or median weight plus weight range)Sex and age were not describedAge was not described+Age was not describedAge was not describedSex was not described
8bProvide further relevant information such as the source of animals, international strain nomenclature, genetic modification status (e.g., knock-out or transgenic), genotype, health/immune status, drug or test naïve, previous procedures, and so forthNot describedNot described+Not describedNot describedNot described

Housing and husbandry9Provide details of
9aHousing (type of facility e.g., specific pathogen free (SPF); type of cage or housing; bedding material; number of cage companions; tank shape and material, etc., for fish).Cage type was not fully describedCage type was not fully describedCage type was not fully describedCage type was not fully describedCage type was not fully describedCage type was not fully described
9bHusbandry conditions (e.g., breeding programme, light/dark cycle, temperature, quality of water, etc., for fish, type of food, access to food, and water, environmental enrichment)Specific type of food given was not described+Light/dark cycle and temperature were not describedSpecific type of food given was not describedNot described (only access to food was described)Not described (only access to food and water was described)
9cWelfare-related assessments and interventions that were carried out prior to, during, or after the experimentNot described++Not describedAnalgesia was not given after the fracture procedure (just depended on cast immobilization)Not described

Sample size10
10aSpecify the total number of animals used in each experiment, and the number of animals in each experimental group++++++
10bExplain how the number of animals was arrived at. Provide details of any sample size calculation usedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot described
10cIndicate the number of independent replications of each experiment, if relevantNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot described
11
Allocating animals to experimental groups11aGive full details of how animals were allocated to experimental groups, including randomisation or matching if performedRandomization procedure was not fully explainedRandomization procedure was not fully explained for the allocation of treatment groupsNot explainedRandomization procedure was not fully explainedNot explainedNot explained
11bDescribe the order in which the animals in the different experimental groups were treated and assessedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot described

Experimental outcomes12Clearly define the primary and secondary experimental outcomes assessed (e.g., cell death, molecular markers, behavioural changes)++++++

Statistical methods13
13aProvide details of the statistical methods used for each analysis++++++
13bSpecify the unit of analysis for each dataset (e.g., single animal, group of animals, single neuron)++++++
13cDescribe any methods used to assess whether the data met the assumptions of the statistical approach+
Not relevant as nonparametric test was used
+
Not relevant as nonparametric test was used
+
Not relevant as nonparametric test was used
+
Not relevant as nonparametric test was used
+
Not relevant as nonparametric test was used
+
Not relevant as nonparametric test was used
Results

Baseline data14For each experimental group, report relevant characteristics and health status of animals (e.g., weight, microbiological status and drug or test naive) prior to treatment or testing (this information may often be tabulated)Not fully described (i.e., only baseline weight was reported)Not fully described (i.e., only baseline weight was reported)Not fully described (i.e., only baseline weight was reported)Not fully described (i.e., only baseline weight was reported)Not fully described (i.e., only baseline weight was reported)Not fully described (i.e., only baseline weight was reported)

Numbers analysed15
15aReport the number of animals in each group included in each analysis. Report absolute numbers (e.g., 10/20, not 50%)++Not described++Not described
15bIf any animals or data were not included in the analysis, explain why?
(no exclusion was reported)
?
(no exclusion was reported)
?
(no exclusion was reported)
?
(no exclusion was reported)
?
(no exclusion was reported)
?
(no exclusion was reported)

Outcomes and estimation16Report the results for each analysis carried out, with a measure of precision (e.g., standard error or confidence interval)+
(see full commentary in reanalysis table)
Some statistical analyses were not reported fully
(see full commentary in reanalysis table)
Not described.
(see full commentary in reanalysis table)
+
(see full commentary in reanalysis table)
+
(see full commentary in reanalysis table)
The measure of precision was not reported in the result
(see full commentary in reanalysis table)

17
Adverse events17aGive details of all important adverse events in each experimental group+
(no complication reported)
Not describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot described
17bDescribe any modifications to the experimental protocols made to reduce adverse eventsNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot describedNot described

Total items described satisfactorily Methods section (per 22 items)
Results section (per 6 items)
10
3
11
1
13
0
9
2
10
2
8
0