Table 2: Comparisona between light transmissions of unexposed potencies (6c–30c)b and potencies exposed to external physical factorsc.

CuSO4HypericumS8
190 nm–340 nm220 nm–340 nm190 nm–340 nm220 nm–340 nm190 nm–340 nm220 nm–340 nm

UnexposedMean0.9999360.9999380.9998340.9998581.0006661.000593
SD0.0005070.0004560.0007610.0007210.0006370.000602

AutoclaveMean0.9999150.9999430.9998010.9998021.0005571.000497
SD0.0005670.0005170.0006730.0005870.0005630.000520
1.0000.7380.8570.6690.4510.590
0.000−0.039−0.021−0.049−0.087−0.062

EMFMean0.9997650.9997790.9998450.9998661.0006611.000594
SD0.0004750.0004230.0005880.0005190.0007150.000677
0.2370.2560.7870.7870.9730.982
−0.139−0.134−0.031−0.031−0.004−0.003

IncubationMean0.9996290.9996490.9999991.0000091.0006491.000571
SD0.0004310.0004090.0003830.0003340.0006230.000587
0.0060.0050.5360.6290.9020.857
−0.322−0.331−0.071−0.056−0.014−0.021

UVMean0.9996100.9996370.9995580.9995861.0006761.000599
SD0.0003420.0003190.0005360.0005170.0005450.000498
0.0010.0010.0290.0330.9730.928
−0.391−0.386−0.252−0.247−0.004−0.010

aby Mann-Whitney- test, mean normalised transmission with standard deviation (SD) is shown, statistically significant results ( ) are displayed in bold, = effect size.
bMeasurements 2 and 3 were combined, since these two measurements were closest in time to the measurements of the exposed samples.
c for CuSO4 and for hypericum and S8 (unexposed), for CuSO4 and for hypericum and S8 (exposed).