Evaluation of a Salutogenetic Concept for Inpatient Psychosomatic Treatment

Table 6

Psychosomatic treatment effects in comparison between HF and 14 other German clinics. A paired t-test was performed on pretreatment and posttreatment data. The Pearson 𝜒²-test was applied to the post-treatment data.

Scale	HF clinic mean (SD)	Other 14 clinics mean (SD)	Significance test
ISR total pre-post	0.58 (±0.48)	0.52 (±0.51)	𝑡=3.84,𝑃<.001
ISR depression pre-post	1.35 (±0.97)	1.18 (±0.96)	𝑡=10.31,𝑃<.001
VEV-K	129.3 (±26.9)	128.3 (±26.7)	𝑡=−1.03, n.s.
GV physical	4.42 (±0.73)	4.22 (±0.77)	𝜒^2=45.8,𝑃<.001
GV psychological	4.69 (±0.87)	4.44 (±1)	𝜒^2=80.3,𝑃<.001
GV self-esteem	4.68 (±0.83)	4.38 (±0.92)	𝜒^2=103.4,𝑃<.001
GV social problems	4.07 (±0.88)	4.05 (±0.94)	𝜒^2=7.8, n.s.
GV private relationships	4.4 (±0.83)	4.26 (±0.95)	𝜒^2=47.0,𝑃<.001
GV occupational	3.89 (±0.83)	3.77 (±0.92)	𝜒^2=50.1,𝑃<.001
GV motivation	4.39 (±0.79)	4.32 (±0.88)	𝜒^2=50.6,𝑃<.001
GV comprehension	4.88 (±0.84)	5.2 (±1.13)	𝜒^2=69.5,𝑃<.001
GV future orientation	4.51 (±0.9)	4.34 (±1.02)	𝜒^2=49.7,𝑃<.001
GV well-being	4.68 (±0.85)	4.4 (±1.02)	𝜒^2=94.6,𝑃<.001
GV daily life requirements	4.33 (±0.81)	4.19 (±0.88)	𝜒^2=31.7,𝑃<.001