Chinese Herbal Medicine for Postinfectious Cough: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Table 4
Evidence qualities of included studies.
No. of studies
Quality assessment
No. of patients
Effect
Quality
Importance
Design
Risk of bias
Inconsistency
Indirectness
Imprecision
Other considerations
Chinese herbal medicine
Control
Relative (95% CI)
Absolute
Cough symptom score (better indicated by lower values)
5
Randomised trials
Serious1,2
No serious inconsistency
No serious indirectness
No serious imprecision
None
216
162
—
Not pooled
◯ Moderate
Critical
Cough relief time (cough relief time) (better indicated by lower values)
7
Randomised trials
Serious3
No serious inconsistency
No serious indirectness
No serious imprecision
None
585
382
—
Not pooled
◯ Moderate
Critical
Cough disappearance time (better indicated by lower values)
2
Randomised trials
No serious risk of bias
No serious inconsistency
No serious indirectness
No serious imprecision
None
322
128
—
Not pooled
High
Critical
TCM syndrome clinical effective rate
9
Randomised trials
Serious3,4
No serious inconsistency
No serious indirectness
No serious imprecision
None
687/764 (89.9%)
357/485 (73.6%)
Not pooled
Not pooled
◯ Moderate
Important
Quality-of-life (QoL) score (better indicated by lower values)
2
Randomised trials
No serious risk of bias
No serious inconsistency
No serious indirectness
No serious imprecision
None
144
89
—
Not pooled
High
Important
Fujimori et al. stopped the study when the significant differences between two groups were detected, which may lead to an overestimation of intervention in the trial group.
2Irifune et al. conducted an open-label trial, which would introduce an influence on subjective patient-report results.
3An MC and Wang YF conducted an open-lable study, which would introduce a bias to subjective patient-report results.
4Huang MH conducted a quasirandom method, which would introduce selection bias.