Topical Antinociceptive Effect of <i>Vanillosmopsis arborea</i> Baker on Acute Corneal Pain in Mice

Inocêncio Leite, Laura Hévila; Leite, Gerlânia de Oliveira; Silva Coutinho, Thales; de Sousa, Severino Denício Gonçalves; Sampaio, Renata Souza; da Costa, José Galberto Martins; de Menezes, Irwin Rose Alencar; Campos, Adriana Rolim

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/708636

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results and Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 708636 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/708636

Topical Antinociceptive Effect of Vanillosmopsis arborea Baker on Acute Corneal Pain in Mice

Laura Hévila Inocêncio Leite,¹Gerlânia de Oliveira Leite,¹Thales Silva Coutinho,¹Severino Denício Gonçalves de Sousa,¹Renata Souza Sampaio,¹José Galberto Martins da Costa,¹Irwin Rose Alencar de Menezes,¹and Adriana Rolim Campos²

Academic Editor: Olumayokun A. Olajide

Received25 Oct 2013

Revised07 Dec 2013

Accepted19 Dec 2013

Published10 Feb 2014

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the possible topical antinociceptive activity of Vanillosmopsis arborea Baker essential oil (EOVA) and to clarify the underlying mechanism, using the acute model of chemical (eye wiping) nociception in mice. EOVA (25 to 200 mg/kg; p.o. and topical) evidenced significant antinociception against chemogenic pain in the test model of formalin-induced neuroinflammatory pain. Local application of 5 M NaCl solution on the corneal surface of the eye produced a significant nociceptive behavior, characterized by eye wiping. The number of eye wipes was counted during the first 30 s. EOVA (25, 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg; p.o. and topical) significantly decreased the number of eye wipes. Naloxone, yohimbine, L-NAME, theophylline, glibenclamide, and ruthenium red had no effect on the antinociceptive effect of EOVA. However, ondansetron, p-chlorophenylalanine methyl ester (PCPA), capsazepine, prazosin, and atropine prevented the antinociception induced by EOVA. These results indicate the topical antinociceptive effect of EOVA and showed that 5-HT, α1, TRPV1, and central muscarinic receptors might be involved in the antinociceptive effect of EOVA in the acute corneal model of pain in mice.

1. Introduction

The small size of the cornea and the extensive branching of the peripheral axons of corneal neurons make this structure the most densely innervated tissue of the body [1]. The majority of corneal sensory fibers are polymodal nociceptors, which are activated by noxious mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli [2].

Safe, long-lasting pain relief following corneal abrasions, corneal ulcers or ophthalmic surgery is difficult to achieve with current analgesics. The use of topical NSAIDs and acetominophen is constrained by their gradual onset and limited efficacy, and the adverse side effects of systemic opioids are well known [3].

Vanillosmopsis arborea Baker is native to the Araripe National Forest, in the Northeast of Brazil in the state of Ceará. There are few studies concerning the traditional use of this plant. However, biological and pharmacological studies have shown that its essential oil presents antimicrobial, antiinflammatory and gastroprotective activities [4].

Topically applied Vanillosmopsis arborea essential oil produced antinociception in acetic acid, cyclophosphamide, mustard oil, capsaicin or formalin-induced visceral pain [5]. The essential oil also suppressed the ear edema induced by Croton oil and phenol but no that one induced by histamine or capsaicin [6].

Ocular pain has not been adequately controlled in many patients and there is a lack of studies that examine the effect of Vanillosmopsis arborea on the perception of corneal pain. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the effects of acute topical administration of Vanillosmopsis arborea on acute corneal pain that was induced by hypertonic saline applied locally on the corneal surface in mice.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Essential Oil

The essential oil from Vanillosmopsis arborea Baker bark (EOVA) was obtained from the Natural Products Research Laboratory of Regional University of Cariri. The composition (w/w) of EOVA revealed the presence of α-bisabolol to the extent of 70%. Other identified compounds were α-cadinol (8.4%), elemicin (6.21%), β-bisabolene (4.46%), δ-guaiene (2.31%), β-cubebene (1.76%), and estragole (1.08%).

2.2. Animals

Male Swiss albino mice (20–25 g) obtained from the Central Animal House of Regional University of Cariri were used. They were housed in environmentally controlled conditions (22°C, 12 h light-dark cycle), with free access to standard pellet diet (Purina, São Paulo, Brazil) and water. Animals were kept in cages with raised floors to prevent coprophagy. The experimental protocols were in accordance with the ethical guidelines of National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA.

2.3. Formalin-Induced Paw Licking

The formalin-induced nociception was performed as described previously by Hunskaar and Hole [7]. Groups of mice () were treated with vehicle (10 mL/kg, p.o.), EOVA (25, 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg p.o. or topical), or morphine (7.5 mg/kg, s.c.) 30 or 60 min before the administration of 20 μL of 1% formalin (in 0.9% saline) into the plantar surface of the right hind paw. The duration of paw licking (s) as an index of painful response was determined at 0–5 min (early phase, neurogenic) and 20–25 min (late phase, inflammatory) after formalin injection.

2.4. Eye Wiping Test

Corneal nociception was induced by a local application of hypertonic saline to the corneal surface [8, 9]. One drop (40 μL) of 5 M NaCl solution was applied locally on the corneal surface of mice using a fine dropper [10]. The number of eye wipes performed with the ipsilateral forepaw was counted for a period of 30 s. Topical (20 μL/eye) or orally (10 mL/kg) EOVA (25, 50, 100 or 200 mg/kg; /group) or vehicle were given 1 h before the noxiou agent. Morphine 7 mg/kg (s.c.; ) was used as positive control. A normal control group () received one drop of 0.15 M NaCl (0.9%).

In order to verify the possible involvement of opioid, noradrenergic, nitrergic, 5-HT₃, muscarinic, , adenosinergic, and TRPV₁ systems in the effect of EOVA, the animals (/group) were treated with the respective antagonist (Table 1), 30 min before the topical administration of EOVA (50 mg/kg). The doses of antagonists were chosen based on previous studies.

To assess the possible contribution of endogenous serotonin, animals (/group) were pretreated with ρ-chlorophenylalanine methyl esther (PCPA, 100 mg/kg, i.p., an inhibitor of serotonin synthesis) or with vehicle, once a day for 4 consecutive days. Then, 24 hours after the last PCPA or vehicle injection, animals received EOVA (50 mg/kg) and 1 h later they were tested in the eye wiping test.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. The data were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance with Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test using the GraphPad Prism 4.0 statistical program. The level of significance was set at .

3. Results and Discussion

In formalin test, pretreatment with EOVA (oral and topical) caused significant diminutions of both first phase (neurogenic) and second phase (inflammatory) nociception responses (Tables 2(a) and 2(b)). Morphine (5 mg/kg), the reference standard, also significantly suppressed the formalin-response at both phases.

Topically administered EOVA (25, 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg) respectively (, , , and , resp.) decreased the number of eye wipes induced by the local application of 5 M NaCl solution on the corneal surface (Table 3(a)). Oral treatment with EOVA also reduced the number of eye wipes (Table 3(b)).

EOVA was evaluated for topical antinociceptive activity in mice using experimental models of chemogenic nociception. EOVA (oral and topical) was effective in attenuating acute neurogenic and tonic inflammatory phases of the formalin response. The essential oil, given topically, elicited a dose-unrelated antinociceptive effect on the paw-licking response, just as observed in the eye wiping test.

The local application of a 5 M NaCl solution to the corneal surface produced corneal nociception. Previous work has shown that the application of hypertonic saline to the tongue and cornea transiently activates nociceptive neurons with wide dynamic range property in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis [11]. Moreover, infusion of hypertonic saline into the masseter muscle produces hind paw shaking in addition to activating c-Fos positive neurons in the ipsilateral trigeminal subnucleus caudalis [12]. The results presented here are in agreement with previous findings [8, 9].

Study of trigeminal pain and analgesic effects on trigeminal acute pains such as headache, muscle spasms, dental problems, or postsurgery pain seems to be more problematic. The cornea is used for nociception studies in trigeminal system [13], since corneal nociceptive receptors have a large representation in the trigeminal ganglion through the ophthalmic branch of trigeminal nerve [14]. Thin myelinated fibres [15] as well as unmyelinated fibers in cornea respond to chemical, mechanical, and thermal noxious stimuli [16]. In rat, wiping the eye with forelimb is an obvious withdrawal response to corneal chemical stimuli. Some researchers have used eye wiping test for investigating the chemical pungency [17] or the presence of C-fiber activity [18, 19]. Eye wiping test is a phasic analgesic test and is sensitive to centrally acting analgesics. Hypertonic saline-induced corneal pain has been introduced as a model of acute pain for study of mechanisms of pain in the trigeminal system in rats [8].

The results of this investigation provide evidence that the essential oil from V. arborea bark is topically active in the attenuation of corneal pain induced by 5 M NaCl. Previous study showed the local antiinflammatory effect of the essential oil from Vanillosmopsis arborea. It was observed that EOVA effect can be related to release of leukotrienes, decrease the production of inflammatory eicosanoids and influence on the production of AA metabolites [6].

This antinociceptive effect may be related to the high α-bisabolol content in EOVA, since that α-bisabolol possess visceral antinociceptive activity [20] and it is able to reduce the neuronal excitability in a concentration-dependent manner [21].

In the present study, we attempted to characterize further some of the mechanisms through which EOVA exerts its antinociceptive action in chemical model of corneal pain in mice.

The antinociceptive effect induced by the EOVA (50 mg/kg) was significantly inhibited by ondansetron, PCPA, prazosin, atropine, and capsazepine (Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8). On the other hand, the administration of glibenclamide, naloxone, ruthenium red, yohimbine, LNAME or theophylline did not prevent the EOVA-induced antinociception (Tables 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13).

Serotoninergic neurons also play a crucial role in the control of pain [22] and the diversity of subtype receptors for serotonin makes this system able to exert either facilitatory or inhibitory function [23]. Spinal 5-HT₃ receptors have been shown to mediate antinociception, possibly via GABA release [24, 25]. Concerning the mechanism through which EOVA exerts its antinociceptive action, the present study shows that the 5-HT₃ receptor is likely involved. This conclusion derives from the fact that pretreatment of animals with the 5-HT₃ antagonist, ondansetron, reversed the antinociception caused by EOVA.

In addition, the treatment of mice with tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor (PCPA) at a dose known to decrease the cortical content of serotonin and to significantly reverse morphine antinociception [26, 27] attenuated the effect of EOVA, indicating the involvement of 5-HT in the antinociceptive effect of EOVA.

In the present study, the involvement of -receptors in the antinociceptive action of EOVA is suggested by the results showing that pretreatment of animals with prazosin (an -receptor antagonist) significantly blocked the antinociception caused by EOVA. Prazosin, a former selective -receptor antagonist, has high affinity for -receptors [28]. It has been suggested that the effects of prazosin against spinal α agonists appear through -receptors, although yohimbine interacts with -receptor site as well as -receptor site [29].

The roles of acetylcholine, cholinergic agonists, and cholinesterase inhibitors, collectively termed cholinomimetics, have been established in the modulation of pain and analgesia [30]. Here we show that the pretreatment of animals with atropine prevented the antinociceptive effect induced by EOVA. This result indicates that the muscarinic receptors are involved in EOVA-induced antinociceptive effect. It is already well established that the analgesic effect of systemic morphine is mediated by a descending cholinergic pathway [31] as well as spinal endogenous acetylcholine acting through muscarinic receptors [32–35].

Ruthenium red (a noncompetitive TRPV₁ antagonist) did not affect the antinociceptive effect of EOVA. However, capsazepine (a competitive TRPV₁ channel antagonist) inhibited this response, indicating that EOVA interacts directly with TRPV₁ receptors may contribute to this antinociception.

In summary, we have demonstrated that topical EOVA reduces the nociceptive behavior in models of formalin-induced paw licking and eye wiping in mice. In the corneal pain model, the observed antinociception is possibly mediated by 5-HT, , muscarinic, and TRPV₁ receptors.

Conflict of Interests

There is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the grants and fellowships from CNPq, CAPES, and FUNCAP, Brazil.

References

L. J. Müller, C. F. Marfurt, F. Kruse, and T. M. T. Tervo, “Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 521–542, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Belmonte, M. C. Acosta, and J. Gallar, “Neural basis of sensation in intact and injured corneas,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 513–525, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Wishaw, D. Billington, D. O'Brien, and P. Davies, “The use of orbital morphine for postoperative analgesia in pterygium surgery,” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 43–45, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. V. Colares, F. Almeida-Souza, N. N. Taniwaki et al., “In vitro antileishmanial activity of essential oil of Vanillosmopsis arborea (Asteraceae) baker,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 727042, 7 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. O. Leite, R. S. Sampaio, L. H. I. Leite et al., “Attenuation of visceral pain in mice by the essential oil from Vanillosmopsis arborea bark,” Revista Dor, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 46–49, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. O. Leite, L. H. I. Leite, R. D. S. Sampaio et al., “Modulation of topical inflammation and visceral nociception by Vanillosmopsis arborea essential oil in mice,” Biomedicine and Preventive Nutrition, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 216–222, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hunskaar and K. Hole, “The formalin test in mice: dissociation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain,” Pain, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 103–114, 1987.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Farazifard, F. Safarpour, V. Sheibani, and M. Javan, “Eye-wiping test: a sensitive animal model for acute trigeminal pain studies,” Brain Research Protocols, vol. 16, no. 1–3, pp. 44–49, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Tamaddonfard, E. Khalilzadeh, N. Hamzeh-Gooshchi, and S. Seiednejhad-Yamchi, “Central effect of histamine in a rat model of acute trigeminal pain,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 219–224, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Kasture and S. Ingale, “Evaluation of analgesic activity of the leaves of Passiflora incarnata Linn,” International Journal of Green Pharmacy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 36–39, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Carstens, N. Kuenzler, and H. O. Handwerker, “Activation of neurons in rat trigeminal subnucleus caudalis by different irritant chemicals applied to oral or ocular mucosa,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 465–492, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Y. Ro, N. F. Capra, J. S. Lee, R. Masri, and Y. H. Chun, “Hypertonic saline-induced muscle nociception and c-fos activation are partially mediated by peripheral NMDA receptors,” European Journal of Pain, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 398–405, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. D. Meng, J. W. Hu, A. P. Benetti, and D. A. Bereiter, “Encoding of corneal input in two distinct regions of the spinal trigeminal nucleus in the rat: cutaneous receptive field properties, responses to thermal and chemical stimulation, modulation by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, and projections to the parabrachial area,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 43–56, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
C. de Felipe, G. G. Gonzalez, J. Gallar, and C. Belmonte, “Quantification and immunocytochemical characteristics of trigeminal ganglion neurons projecting to the cornea: effect of corneal wounding,” European Journal of Pain, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Belmonte, J. Gallar, M. A. Pozo, and I. Rebollo, “Excitation by irritant chemical substances of sensory afferent units in the cat's cornea,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 437, pp. 709–725, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Gallar, M. A. Pozo, R. P. Tuckett, and C. Belmonte, “Response of sensory units with unmyelinated fibres to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimulation of the cat's cornea,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 468, pp. 609–622, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Lee, J. Lee, J. Kim et al., “N-(3-acyloxy-2-benzylpropyl)-N′-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzyl)thiourea derivatives as potent vanilloid receptor agonists and analgesics,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Farazifard, R. Kiani, M. Noorbakhsh, and H. Esteky, “Effects of neonatal C-fiber depletion on the integration of paired-whisker inputs in rat barrel cortex,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 115–121, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Karai, D. C. Brown, A. J. Mannes et al., “Deletion of vanilloid receptor 1-expressing primary afferent neurons for pain control,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 113, no. 9, pp. 1344–1352, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. O. Leite, L. H. I. Leite, R. D. S. Sampaio et al., “(−)-α-bisabolol attenuates visceral nociception and inflammation in mice,” Fitoterapia, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 208–211, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Ade, J. C. R. Gonçalves, J. S. Cruz, and D. A. M. Araújo, “Evaluation of the sesquiterpene (−)-α-bisabolol as a novel peripheral nervous blocker,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 472, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Fields, M. M. Heinricher, and P. Mason, “Neurotransmitters in nociceptive modulatory circuits,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 14, pp. 219–245, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Bardin, J. Lavarenne, and A. Eschalier, “Serotonin receptor subtypes involved in the spinal antinociceptive effect of 5-HT in rats,” Pain, vol. 86, no. 1-2, pp. 11–18, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Alhaider, S. Z. Lei, and G. L. Wilcox, “Spinal 5-HT3 receptor-mediated antinociception: possible release of GABA,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1881–1888, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. Millan, “Descending control of pain,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 355–474, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Pini, M. Sandrini, and G. Vitale, “The antinociceptive action of paracetamol is associated with changes in the serotonergic system in the rat brain,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 308, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. S. Santos, R. O. P. de Campos, O. G. Miguel, V. Cechinel-Filho, R. A. Yunes, and J. B. Calixto, “The involvement of K⁺ channels and G(i/o) protein in the antinociceptive action of the gallic acid ethyl ester,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 379, no. 1, pp. 7–17, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Bylund, C. Ray-Prenger, and T. J. Murphy, “Alpha-2A and alpha-2B adrenergic receptor subtypes: antagonist binding in tissues and cell lines containing only one subtype,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 245, no. 2, pp. 600–607, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takano and T. L. Yaksh, “Characterization of the pharmacology of intrathecally administered alpha-2 agonists and antagonists in rats,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 261, no. 2, pp. 764–772, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
P. G. Jones and J. Dunlop, “Targeting the cholinergic system as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of pain,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Chiang and M. Zhuo, “Evidence for the involvement of a descending cholinergic pathway in systemic morphine analgesia,” Brain Research, vol. 478, no. 2, pp. 293–300, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
S. R. Chen and H. L. Pan, “Spinal endogenous acetylcholine contributes to the analgesic effect of systemic morphine in rats,” Anesthesiology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 525–530, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Radhakrishnan and K. A. Sluka, “Spinal muscarinic receptors are activated during low or high frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia in rats,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1111–1119, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Honda, S. Ando, K. Koga, and Y. Takano, “The spinal muscarinic receptor subtypes contribute to the morphine-induced antinociceptive effects in thermal stimulation in mice,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 371, no. 2-3, pp. 235–238, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. P. Chen, S. R. Chen, and H. L. Pan, “Systemic morphine inhibits dorsal horn projection neurons through spinal cholinergic system independent of descending pathways,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 314, no. 2, pp. 611–617, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Laura Hévila Inocêncio Leite et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1722

Downloads

1039

Citations