Review Article

Changes of Local Blood Flow in Response to Acupuncture Stimulation: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Skin blood flow results of comparison between groups.

Author (year) Immediately after acupuncture insertion or manipulationDuring acupunctureAfter acupuncture withdrawalFollow-up
(within 1 min)(within 5 min)

⁢Acupuncture versus no-acupuncture
Sandberg et al. (2005) [17]HS: (↑)
FM: (↑)
TM:
HS: (↑)
FM: (↑)
TM: NS
HS: (↑)
FM: NS
TM: NS
HS: NS
FM: NS
TM: NS
Sandberg et al. (2004) [18]FM: (↑)FM: (↑)
Sandberg et al. (2003) [19] (↑)NS

⁢Acupuncture versus nonpenetrating acupuncture (same acupoint)
Huang et al. (2012) [14]NSNSNSNS
Tsuchiya et al. (2007) [16] (↑) (↑)

⁢Acupuncture versus superficial acupuncture
Huang et al. (2012) [14]NSNSNSNS
Sandberg et al. (2005) [17]HS: NS
FM: (↑)
(Sup > Deep)
TM: NS
HS: (↑)
FM: NS
TM: NS
HS: (↑)
FM: NS
TM: NS
HS: NS
FM: NS
TM: NS
Sandberg et al. (2004) [18]FM: (↑)FM: (↑)
Sandberg et al. (2003) [19] (↑)NS

⁢Acupoint versus nonacupoint
Huang et al. (2012) [14]NSNSNSNS
Zhang et al. (2008) [15]NSNSNS
Litscher et al. (2002) [20]p < 0.001 (↓)NS

⁢Acupuncture with manipulation versus insertion-only
Min et al. (2015) [13] (↑)NS
Sandberg et al. (2003) [19]p = 0.003 (↑)NS

Superficial acupuncture had greater increase of skin blood flow than deep acupuncture; FM, fibromyalgia patients; HS, healthy subjects; NS, not significantly different; TM, trapezius myalgia patients. Most statistically significant values indicate the increase of blood flow compared to the control. “↑” means increase of blood flow compared to the control. “↓” means decrease of blood flow compared to the control. “—” means “not reported” or “not applicable.”