Ethnobotanical Study of Mosquito Repellent Plants Used in Seweyna District, Bale Zone, Southeast, Ethiopia

Shibeshi, Asefash; Sebsibe, Ayalew; Teka, Alemtshay; Aklilu, Esayas

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6610579

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2024 | Article ID 6610579 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6610579

Ethnobotanical Study of Mosquito Repellent Plants Used in Seweyna District, Bale Zone, Southeast, Ethiopia

Asefash Shibeshi,¹Ayalew Sebsibe,¹Alemtshay Teka,²and Esayas Aklilu²

Academic Editor: Adolfo Andrade-Cetto

Received09 Jun 2023

Revised01 Mar 2024

Accepted04 Mar 2024

Published15 Mar 2024

Abstract

Malaria control efforts through vector control strategies are hindered by the development of insecticide resistance by major malaria vectors in many malaria-endemic areas, which necessitate the need for alternative control measures. The aim of this study was to document plants traditionally used as mosquito repellents in Seweyna district, southeastern Ethiopia. The ethnobotanical data were collected using semistructured interviews, field observation, and guided field walks in four kebeles of the district with 98 informants. A total of 19 plant species were used by the local community as mosquito repellent, with 42.1% being trees. These plant species belong to 12 families. Of these families, the family Burseraceae was the most represented, with four species, followed by Fabaceae (3 species). The most frequently mentioned plant species were Mimusops kummel (90.81%), followed by Acokanthera schimperi (84.69%), Boswellia microphylla (79.6%), and Calpurnia aurea (79.6%). The stem was the most common plant part used (47.3%) to repel mosquitoes. Most of the local communities (52.6%) use the burning of either fresh or dry plant parts to generate smoke, which is the most common practice. The current ethnobotanical study indicates that the local community in the Seweyna district uses the plants to repel mosquitoes. In the future, the repellent efficacy of these plants against the major malaria vector should be tested under laboratory and field conditions. Besides, the identification of the bioactive compounds responsible for the repellent activity should also be determined.

1. Introduction

Mosquito-borne diseases, such as dengue, yellow fever, zika, chikungunya, malaria, and others, are the major sources of morbidity and mortality for several millions of people. Malaria is a major public health problem in tropical and subtropical countries of the world with an estimated 247 million clinical cases and 619 000 deaths in 2021. Ninety-two and ninety-three percent of the cases and deaths, respectively, occurred in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries [1].

In Ethiopia, as in other SSA countries, malaria is one of the top public health problems with millions of cases and thousands of fatalities reported each year [2]. The country has a population of more than 110 million, and it is estimated that approximately 52% of the population is at risk of the disease [3]. Anopheles arabiensis, a member of the An. gambiae species complex, is the principal vector whereas An. pharoensis, An. funestus, and An. nili are the secondary vectors of the disease in the country [4].

Vector control, achieved through indoor residual spraying (IRS) and large-scale distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), is one of the currently implemented malaria control strategies in Ethiopia. This method, along with other malaria control strategies, has reduced malaria-related illness and mortality in the country [2, 5]. Despite reports stating the efficacy of the vector control methods (IRS and LLINs), insecticide resistance in malaria vectors poses a serious threat to the success of malaria vector control programs in SSA [6–10]. In addition, various studies have pointed out that IRS and LLINS have a limited effect on malaria vectors that are active during the early hours of the night and have an exophagic feeding behavior [11–14]. Furthermore, the chemical insecticides used to prepare the IRS and LLINs may pose a serious threat to the health of humans and the environment [15]. Consequently, to overcome the aforementioned limitations, there is a need to develop new vector control methods that complement the currently used vector control approaches.

Insect repellents of plant origin have been used to protect humans from the bites of host-seeking mosquitoes [16]. Such repellents may have a fundamental role in areas where malaria vectors are active during the early hours of the night, as the inhabitants are often outdoors at these times. Thus, they may serve as a complementary method to the indoor-based vector control method [17].

The use of traditional repellents to repel/kill mosquitoes and other blood-sucking insects is common in rural communities in Africa [18]. For example, in Kenya, direct burning and placing branches or whole plants are the common methods to drive away mosquitoes [18]. In Eritrea, hanging the different plant parts on the walls at the head and foot of beds reduces endophagic mosquitoes [19]. In Tanzania, people burn or place fresh plant materials at selected places or spray to decrease the number of mosquitoes indoors at night [20]. In different parts of Ethiopia, smoking by burning various parts of repellent plants is the principal way of deterring nuisances and biting insects [17, 21].

Documentation of indigenous knowledge and the use of plants as repellents for mosquitoes/insects are very essential for different reasons. The first reason is that it is a precondition for future research on the development of a new repellent or an insecticidal compound [15]. The second reason is that such knowledge and practice are transferred from one generation to the next generation mostly through the word of mouth. However, this way of conveying indigenous knowledge and cultural practices may face distortion or extinction due to different factors [22]. Hence, this study was carried out to assess the knowledge and usage customs of traditional insect/mosquito repellent plants in Seweyna district, Bale Zone, Southeast Ethiopia, where malaria is endemic (Bale Zone Health Bureau unpublished data).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Study Area

Seweyna district is located 7°19′60″ N and 41°19′60″ E of Bale Zone in Oromia Regional State, southeast Ethiopia (Figure 1). It is situated about 619 km away from Addis Ababa, at an altitude of approximately 1800 meters above sea level (masl) and the mean annual temperature and annual rainfall of the district are about 30⁰ C and 700 mm, respectively. The rainy seasons are from September to November and March to June. In the majority of the area, the vegetation type is bushy shrubs. According to the Central Statistical Agency report (2005), the total population of the district was estimated to reach 49,381. The majority of the population belongs to the Oromo ethnic group and follows the Muslim religion. Many of the people in the district depend on the raising of cattle as a means of subsistence. In addition, the people are producing different crops such as maize, sorghum teff, and khat (Catha edulis).

2.2. Study Site and Informant Selection

Ethnobotanical survey was conducted in Seweyna district from May to September 2018. The district has 19 kebeles (the smallest administrative unit). For the survey, four kebeles (Micha, Mandera, Katta Dibbe, and Horsa) were selected purposefully. The kebeles were selected based on the medicinal plant use practices of the community and the previously reported high number of malaria cases (Seweyna Health Center unpublished data). A total of ninety-eight informants (88 general and 10 key informants) were selected. The general informants who volunteered to participate were selected randomly by a lottery method. In order to collect additional specific quantitative data, key informants who were acknowledged by the local community elders, religious leaders, and local administrators were purposefully selected [23].

2.3. Ethnobotanical Data Collection

Ethnobotanical data were collected using semistructured interviews, field observation, and guided field walks with the informants. The questionnaire was prepared in English and translated into the common language, Afan Oromo. The informants were asked about the plants used to repel mosquitoes, the plant parts used, the mode of application, the condition of the plant parts used (dried or fresh), and the method of preparation.

2.4. Plant Collection and Identification

All reported plant specimens were collected, dried, and identified at the National Herbarium of Addis Ababa University. The plants were identified using the Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea in comparison with authenticated specimens from the Herbarium and later confirmed by senior taxonomists of the Herbarium. The voucher specimens were deposited at Madda Walabu University, Ethiopia.

2.5. Ethical Consideration

Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the Seweyna district administration office and community leaders. The purpose of the study was explained to the informants prior to the interview and informed verbal consent was obtained from each informant.

2.6. Data Analysis

The collected ethnobotanical data were entered into SPSS version 20 and summarized using descriptive statistics. Descriptive statistical methods (percentage and frequency) were used to summarize the traditional knowledge of the community related to the plants used to repel mosquitoes, the plant parts used, the condition of the plant parts used, the method of preparation, and the mode of application. In addition, the local importance of each species was analyzed by the relative frequency of citation (RFC) which is expressed by the total number of informants mentioning the use of the species (the frequency of citation (FC)) divided by the total number of informants (N).

Furthermore, a preference ranking of seven medicinal plants that were indicated as effective mosquito repellents in the study area was conducted using 10 key informants. All informants were asked to compare the plants based on their efficacy and to mark the highest value (7) for the most preferred and the lowest value (1) for the least preferred.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Informants

The sociodemographic characteristics of the study informants are presented in Table 1. Of the total informants, 92.9% were male and 7.1% were female. The age of the informants ranged from 31 to 81 years with the majority between 41 and 60 years old. 80.61% of the informants were illiterate and 42.9% of them had a monthly income between 201 and 400 Ethiopian Birr. 88% of the informants were farmers and all of the informants belonged to the Muslim religion (Table 1).

3.2. Diversity and Source of Plant Species Used for Repelling Mosquito

A total of 19 plant species were used by the local community as a mosquito repellent in the district (Table 2). These plant species belong to 12 families. Of these families, the family Burseraceae was the most represented family with four species followed by Fabaceae (3 species). The family Combretaceae and Solanaceae were represented by two species each, while the remaining families consisted of a single species each. The majority of plant species (42.1%) used as mosquito repellent were trees, while 31.58% and 26.32% were shrubs and herbs, respectively.

The most frequently mentioned plant species were Mimusops kummel mentioned by 89 (90.81%) and Acokanthera schimperi mentioned by 83 (84.69%) informants. Calpurnia aurea and Boswellia microphylla were cited by 72 (79.6%) informants each and Boswellia neglecta and Allium sativum were mentioned by 71 (72.4%) informants each (Figure 2).

3.3. Plant Parts Used, State of Plant Material, and Method of Application of Mosquito Repellent Plants

The stem was the most common plant part used (47.3%) to repel mosquitoes followed by the leaves (21%) and seed (10.5%) (Figure 3). The majority of plant parts (80%) were used in dried form. Most of the local communities (52.6%) used burning of either fresh or dry plant parts to generate smoke as the most common practice, followed by topical application on the skin (42.1%) and by sweeping the house with the plant (5.3%) (Figure 4).

3.4. Preference Ranking of Medicinal Plants Used as Mosquito Repellent

The preference ranking of the seven frequently cited plants used for repelling mosquitoes in the study area showed that Acokanthera schimperi was the most preferred by the local people followed by Mimusops kummel (Table 3).

4. Discussion

This study attempted to document knowledge about plant species used as repellents against mosquitoes in Seweyna district, southeastern Ethiopia where malaria is endemic, to identify the potential candidate that might be formulated as insect repellent. In the present study, a total of 19 plant species were reported to be used as mosquito repellents in the study area. As compared to the previous studies conducted in various parts of the country [17, 24, 25], a relatively higher number of insect-repellent plants were recorded in the present study district. This signifies that the area consisted of a considerable diversity of plant species. Of the total plant species recorded, the families Burseraceae and Fabaceae contributed four and three species, respectively. These plant families were previously reported in different parts of Ethiopia [17, 21, 25–27]. This might indicate that these families have a wider geographical distribution and rich bioactive substances that play a significant role in the repellent activity of the plant.

The most repeatedly cited mosquito-repellent plant was Mimusops kummel (90.81%). The use of this plant as an insect repellent and/or insecticidal has also been reported in the Raya-Azebo district, northern Ethiopia [28]. Such high agreement among the study participants and similar reports with communities in different areas may signify that the plant species has a better efficacy and appears to contain more biologically active ingredients as compared to plants with less frequency of citation in the present study, although no previous study has analyzed the phytochemical effect of this plant against mosquitoes.

Acokanthera schimperi, which is native to Yemen and East Africa, is the second repeatedly cited and most preferred mosquito repellent plant by the local community in the study area. Such plants have been used for similar purposes by pastoral and agropastoral communities in Dengego, Erer, and Harla Valleys in Eastern Ethiopia [29, 30]. In addition, the in vivo antimalarial activity of the leaf extract of Acokanthera schimperi against Plasmodium berghei was evaluated in Ethiopia and showed significant suppression of the parasitaemia [31]. Furthermore, in Kenya, the larvicidal activity of the plant species was tested against the larvae of two tick species (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Boophilus decoloratus) and resulted in a moderately high mortality in the larvae of the tick species [32].

Calpurnia aurea is a member of the family Fabaceae and is widespread in sub-Saharan Africa and India [33]. In the current study, the plant is the third most preferred mosquito repellent. In accordance with the present study, the community in Jabi Tehnan district, northwestern Ethiopia, used C. aurea as one of the mosquito repellent plants [26]. Likewise, people in Kolla Temben district, northern Ethiopia, used the plant for a similar purpose. Besides documenting its mosquito-repellent effect, studies have been conducted to evaluate its larvicidal effect under laboratory conditions. Eukubay et al. [34] evaluated the methanol leaf extract of C. aurea at concentrations ranging from 50 to 300 ppm against 3^rd instar An. arabiensis larvae and found 100% mortality at the maximum concentration. Similarly, Muhammed et al. [35] assessed the larvicidal effects of aqueous, hexane, and methanol crude leaf extracts of C. aurea with various concentrations ranging from 25 ppm to 300 ppm against the third to fourth instar larvae of An. stephensi. The authors reported that 100% mortality was found in aqueous and methanol extracts with high concentrations (200–300 ppm). Such a high biological activity might be attributed to the presence of bioactive secondary metabolites, including phenolic, tannin, alkaloids, flavonoids, and saponin [36].

The results of the current study with respect to the parts of the plants used for driving away the mosquitoes indicated that the local communities mainly used the stems (47.3%), followed by leaves (21%). This result is in agreement with the previous reports [26, 29]. Such repeated use of stem parts in the study area can threaten the survival of local medicinal plants unless a sustainable harvest mechanism is developed [37].

The most favored method of application to repel mosquitoes was burning the plant parts and smoking in the house. Similar findings have been reported in the previous studies in Ethiopia [17, 29], Eritrea [19], Kenya [18], Guinea Bissau [38], and Burundi [39]. Despite the fact that there is no detailed study which indicates how repellent smokes or their constituents act, Dube et al. [40] have proposed the following possible mechanisms for the action of the plant derived on the insects. The smoke may conceal the chemical substances that come out of the human body, which is important for the mosquitoes to locate their hosts, and it may interrupt the convection currents vital for mosquitoes to host location; and burning the plant parts may release volatile compounds, either already present in the plant parts or created during the burning process, that act as repellents or irritants against mosquitoes.

5. Conclusions

The current ethnobotanical study indicates that the local community in the Seweyna district uses the plants to repel mosquitoes. A total of nineteen plant species were reported. Of these, Acokanthera schimperi, Mimusops kummel, and Calpurnia aurea were the most preferred plant species used as mosquito repellent in the district. In the future, the repellent efficacy of these preferred plants against the major malaria vector should be tested under laboratory and field conditions. Besides, the identification of the bioactive compounds responsible for the repellent activity should also be determined.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The study was financially supported by the Madda Walabu University.

References

Who, World Malaria Report 2022, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
Pmi, “U.S. President’s malaria initiative Ethiopia,” Malaria Operational Plan FY 2023, Project Management Institute, New York, NY, USA, 2023.
View at: Google Scholar
Fmoh, “Ethiopia malaria elimination strategic plan: 2021-2025. Towards a malaria free Ethiopia,” Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Ghebreyesus, W. Deressa, K. Witten, A. Getachew, and T. Seboxa, “Malaria,” in Epidemiology and Ecology of Health and Disease in Ethiopia, Y. Berhane, D. Haile Marim, and H. Kloos, Eds., pp. 556–576, Shama Books, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Taffese, E. Hemming-Schroeder, C. Koepfli et al., “Malaria epidemiology and interventions in Ethiopia from 2001 to 2016,” Infectious Diseases of Poverty, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 103, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. N’Guessan, V. Corbel, M. Akogbéto, and M. Rowland, “Reduced efficacy of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying for malaria control in pyrethroid resistance area, Benin,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 199–206, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Balkew, M. Ibrahim, L. Koekemoer et al., “Insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) from villages in central, northern and south west Ethiopia and detection of kdr mutation,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 40, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yewhalaw, F. Wassie, W. Steurbaut et al., “Multiple insecticide resistance: an impediment to insecticide-based malaria vector control program,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e16066, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Asale, Y. Getachew, W. Hailesilassie, N. Speybroeck, L. Duchateau, and D. Yewhalaw, “Evaluation of the efficacy of DDT indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets against insecticide resistant populations of Anopheles arabiensis Patton (Diptera: Culicidae) from Ethiopia using experimental huts,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 131, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Alemayehu, A. Asale, K. Eba et al., “Mapping insecticide resistance and characterization of resistance mechanisms in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Ethiopia,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 407, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Russell, N. Govella, S. Azizi, C. Drakeley, S. Kachur, and G. Killeen, “Increased proportions of outdoor feeding among residual malaria vector populations following increased use of insecticide-treated nets in rural Tanzania,” Malaria Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 80, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kitau, R. M. Oxborough, P. Tungu et al., “Species shifts in the Anopheles gambiae complex: do LLINs successfully control Anopheles arabiensis?” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e31481, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Kenea, M. Balkew, H. Tekie et al., “Human-biting activities of Anopheles species in south-central Ethiopia,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 527, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Dambach, M. Schleicher, P. Korir et al., “Nightly biting cycles of Anopheles species in rural northwestern Burkina Faso,” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1027–1034, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Youmsi, P. Fokou, E. Menkem et al., “Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used as insects repellents in six malaria endemic localities of Cameroon,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 33, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Maia and S. Moore, “Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing,” Malaria Journal, vol. 10, no. S1, p. S11, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Karunamoorthi, K. Ilango, and A. Endale, “Ethnobotanical survey of knowledge and usage custom of traditional insect/mosquito repellent plants among the Ethiopian Oromo ethnic group,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 224–229, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Seyoum, K. Palsson, S. Kung’a et al., “Traditional use of mosquito-repellent plants in western Kenya and their evaluation in semi-field experimental huts against Anopheles gambiae: ethnobotanical studies and application by thermal expulsion and direct burning,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 225–231, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Waka, R. Hopkins, and C. Curtis, “Ethnobotanical survey and testing of plants traditionally used against hematophagous insects in Eritrea,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 95–101, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Innocent, A. Hassanali, W. Kisinza, P. Mutalemwa, S. Magesa, and E. Kayombo, “Anti-mosquito plants as an alternative or incremental method for malaria vector control among rural communities of Bagamoyo District, Tanzania,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 56, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Karunamoorthi and T. Hailu, “Insect repellent plants traditional usage practices in the Ethiopian malaria epidemic-prone setting: an ethnobotanical survey,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 22, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Tefera and Y. Kim, “Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in the hawassa zuria district, sidama zone, southern Ethiopia,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 25, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Martin, Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1995.
K. Karunamoorthi and E. Husen, “Knowledge and self-reported practice of the local inhabitants on traditional insect repellent plants in Western Hararghe zone, Ethiopia,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 212–219, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kidane, Z. Tomass, and T. Dejene, “Community knowledge of traditional mosquito repellent plants in Kolla temben district, tigray, northern Ethiopia,” Scientific Research and Essays, vol. 8, pp. 1139–1144, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Berhan, Z. Asfaw, and E. Kelbessa, “Ethnobotany of plants used as insecticides, repellents and antimalarial agents in Jabitehnan district, west Gojjam,” Sinet: Ethiopian Journal of Science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 87–92, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Bekele, Z. Asfaw, B. Petros, and H. Tekie, “Ethnobotanical study of plants used for protection against insect bite and for the treatment of livestock health problems in rural areas of Akaki District, Eastern Shewa, Ethiopia,” Topclass Journal of Herbal Medicine, vol. 1, pp. 12–24, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Giday, “Traditional knowledge of people on plants used as insect repellents and insecticides in Raya-Azebo district, Tigray region of Ethiopia,” Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, vol. 17, pp. 336–343, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Belayneh, Z. Asfaw, S. Demissew, and N. Bussa, “Medicinal plants potential and use by pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Erer Valley of Babile Wereda, Eastern Ethiopia,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 42, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Belayneh and N. Bussa, “Ethnomedicinal plants used to treat human ailments in the prehistoric place of Harla and Dengego valleys, eastern Ethiopia,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 18, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Mohammed, B. Erko, and M. Giday, “Evaluation of antimalarial activity of leaves of Acokanthera schimperi and Croton macrostachyus against Plasmodium berghei in Swiss albino mice,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 314, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nanyingi, J. Mbaria, A. Lanyasunya et al., “Ethnopharmacological survey of Samburu district, Kenya,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 14, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Korir, J. Kiplimo, N. Crouch, N. Moodley, and N. Koorbanally, “Isoflavones from Calpurnia Aurea subsp. Aurea and their anticancer activity,” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 33–37, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Eukubay, E. Getu, E. Debebe, and M. Hadis, “Larvicidal potential of some plant extracts against Anopheles arabiensis Patton (Diptera: Culicidae),” International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 479–485, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Muhammed, S. Dugassa, M. Belina, S. Zohdy, S. Irish, and A. Gebresilassie, “Insecticidal effects of some selected plant extracts against Anopheles stephensi (Culicidae:Diptera),” Malaria Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 295, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kemal, T. Zerihun, S. Alemu et al., “In vitro Acaricidal activity of selected medicinal plants traditionally used against ticks in eastern Ethiopia,” Journal of Parasitology Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 7834026, 10 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Mavundza, R. Maharaj, J. Finnie, G. Kabera, and J. Van Staden, “An ethnobotanical survey of mosquito repellent plants in uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 1516–1520, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Palsson and T. Jaenson, “Comparison of Plant products and pyrethroid-treated bed nets for protection against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Guinea Bissau, West Africa,” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 144–148, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Havyarimana, J. Nkengurutse, J. Ngezahayo, A. Cuni-Sanchez, and T. Masharabu, “Antimalarial and mosquito repellent plants: insights from Burundi,” Ethnobotany Research and Applications, vol. 25, p. 31, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Dube, K. Tadesse, G. Birgersson et al., “Fresh, dried or smoked? Repellent properties of volatiles emitted from ethnomedicinal plant leaves against malaria and yellow fever vectors in Ethiopia,” Malaria Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 375, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Asefash Shibeshi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

233

Downloads

120

Citations