About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Economics Research International
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 401928, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/401928
Review Article

R&D Direction and North-South Diffusion, Human Capital, Growth, and Wages

Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto and CEFUP, Rua Roberto Frias, 4200-464 Porto, Portugal

Received 18 January 2011; Revised 11 April 2011; Accepted 5 May 2011

Academic Editor: Almas Heshmati

Copyright © 2011 Óscar Afonso. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Jones, “Sources of U.S. economic growth in a world of ideas,” American Economic Review, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 220–239, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. L. Arnold, “Growth, welfare, and trade in an integrated model of human-capital accumulation and research,” Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 81–105, 1998.
  3. K. Blackburn, V. Hung, and A. Pozzolo, “Research, development and human capital accumulation,” Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 189–206, 2000.
  4. M. Funke and H. Strulik, “On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety,” European Economic Review, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 491–515, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Redding, “The low-skill, low-quality trap: strategic complementarities between human capital and R&D,” Economic Journal, vol. 106, no. 435, pp. 458–470, 1996.
  6. P. Aghion and P. Howitt, “A model of growth through creative destruction,” Econometrica, vol. 60, pp. 323–352, 1992.
  7. P. Romer, “Endogenous technological change,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, pp. S71–S102, 1990.
  8. M. Connolly, “The dual nature of trade: measuring its impact on imitation and growth,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 31–55, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. R. Barro and X. Sala-i-Martin, “Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1997.
  10. A. Bernard and C. Jones, “Productivity across industries and countries: time series theory and evidence,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 135–146, 1996.
  11. A. Bernard and C. Jones, “Comparing apples to oranges: convergence and measurement across industries and countries,” American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1216–1238, 1996.
  12. P. Klenow and A. Rodriguez-Clare, “The neoclassical revival in growth economics: has it gone too far?” in NBER Macroeconomics Annual, B. Bernanke and J. Rotemberg, Eds., pp. 73–103, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1997.
  13. R. Hall and C. Jones, “Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 83–116, 1999.
  14. G. Grossman and E. Helpman, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1991.
  15. E. Helpman, “Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights,” Econometrica, vol. 30, pp. 1247–1280, 1993.
  16. R. Solow, “A contribution to the theory of economic growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 70, pp. 65–94, 1956.
  17. R. Solow, Growth Theory: An Exposition, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  18. E. Helpman, The Mystery of Economic Growth, Balknap for Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2004.
  19. P. Romer, “Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization,” American Economic Review, vol. 77, pp. 56–62, 1987.
  20. W. Ethier, “National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade,” American Economic Review, vol. 72, pp. 389–405, 1982.
  21. A. Dixit and J. Stiglitz, “Monopolistic competition and optimal product diversity,” American Economic Review, vol. 67, pp. 297–308, 1977.
  22. R. Lucas, “On the mechanics of economic development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3–42, 1988.
  23. L. Jones and R. Manuelli, “A convex model of equilibrium growth: theory and policy implications,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, pp. 1008–1038, 1990.
  24. Z. Griliches and F. Lichtenberg, “R&D and productivity growth at the industrial level: is there still a relationship?” in Patents and Productivity, Z. Griliches, Ed., pp. 465–496, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1984.
  25. F. Lichtenberg, “R&D investment and international productivity differences,” in Economic Growth in the World Economy, H. Siebert, Ed., pp. 89–110, J. C. B. Mohr, Tubingen, Germany, 1993.
  26. D. Coe and E. Helpman, “International R&D spillovers,” European Economic Review, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 859–897, 1995.
  27. D. Coe, E. Helpman, and A. Hoffmaister, “International R&D spillovers and institutions,” European Economic Review, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 723–741, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. P. Romer, “Increasing returns and long-run growth,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, pp. 1002–1037, 1986.
  29. L. Rivera-Batiz and P. Romer, “Economic Integration and endogenous growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, pp. 553–555, 1991.
  30. G. Grossman and E. Helpman, “Comparative advantage and long run growth,” American Economic Review, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 796–815, 1990.
  31. G. Grossman and E. Helpman, “Endogenous product cycles,” Economic Journal, vol. 101, no. 408, pp. 1214–1229, 1991.
  32. R. Barro and X. Sala-i-Martin, Economic Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 2004.
  33. P. Segerstrom, T. Anant, and E. Dinopoulos, “A Schumpeterian model of product life cycle,” American Economic Review, vol. 80, pp. 1077–1092, 1990.
  34. G. Grossman and E. Helpman, “Quality ladders in the theory of growth,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 58, pp. 43–61, 1991.
  35. G. Grossman and E. Helpman, “Quality ladders and product cycles,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, pp. 557–586, 1991.
  36. G. Gancia and F. Zilibotti, “Horizontal innovation in the theory of growth and development,” in Handbook of Economic Growth, P. Aghion and S. Durlauf, Eds., pp. 111–170, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005.
  37. P. Segerstrom and J. Zolnierek, “The R&D incentives of industry leaders,” International Economic Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 745–766, 1999.
  38. P. Segerstrom, “Intel economics,” International Economic Review, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 247–280, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. Ó. Afonso and A. M. Bandeira, “Maintenance and destruction of R&D leadership,” The Manchester School, forthcoming.
  40. E. Dinopoulos and C. Syropoulos, “Rent protection as a barrier to innovation and growth,” Economic Theory, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 309–332, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. E. Dinopoulos and C. Syropoulos, “Globalization, factor endowments, and scale-invariant growth,” in Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Dynamics, Economic Growth and International Trade, (DEGIT '04), University of Florida, Reykjavik, Iceland, June 2004.
  42. F. Sener, “Intellectual property rights and rent protection in a North-South product-cycle model,” Union College, New York, Mimeo, 2004, http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2005/0107_0800_0501.pdf.
  43. P. Aghion, C. Harris, P. Howitt, and J. Vickers, “Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 467–492, 2001.
  44. P. Thompson and D. Waldo, “Growth and trustified capitalism,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 445–462, 1994.
  45. P. Romer, “Idea gaps and object gaps in economic development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 543–573, 1993.
  46. J. Bound, C. Cummins, Z. Griliches, B. Hall, and A. Jaffe, “Who does R&D and who patents?” in Patent and Productivity, Z. Griliches, Ed., pp. 21–54, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1984.
  47. S. Kortum, “Equilibrium R&D and the patent-R&D ratio: U.S. evidence,” American Economic Review, vol. 83, pp. 450–457, 1993.
  48. P. Thompson, “Technological opportunity and the growth of knowledge: a Schumpeterian approach to measurement,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 77–97, 1996.
  49. C. Papageorgiou, “Technology adoption, human capital, and growth theory,” Review of Development Economics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351–368, 2002.
  50. T. Bresnahan and M. Trajtenberg, “General purpose technologies: engines of growth?” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 83–108, 1995.
  51. E. Helpman and M. Trajtenberg, “A time to sow and a time to reap: growth based on general purpose technologies,” in General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, E. Helpman, Ed., pp. 55–83, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1998.
  52. P. David, “The dynamo and the computer: a historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox,” American Economic Review, vol. 80, pp. 355–361, 1990.
  53. P. Aghion, P. Howitt, and G. Violante, “Wage inequality and technological change: a Nelson-Phelps approach,” in Knowledge, Information, and Expectations in Modern Economics, P. Aghion, R. Frydman, J. Stiglitz, and M. Woodford, Eds., pp. 443–461, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2003.
  54. D. Coe, E. Helpman, and A. Hoffmaister, “North-south R&D spillovers,” Economic Journal, vol. 107, no. 440, pp. 134–149, 1997.
  55. E. Helpman and A. Hoffmaister, “North-south R&D spillovers,” Economic Journal, vol. 107, no. 440, pp. 134–149, 1997.
  56. J. Eaton and S. Kortum, “International patenting and technology diffusion: theory and measurement,” International Economic Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 537–570, 1999.
  57. J. Eaton and S. Kortum, “Trade in capital goods,” European Economic Review, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1195–1235, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. N. Stokey, “Free trade, factor returns, and factor accumulation,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 421–447, 1996.
  59. P. Aghion and P. Howitt, Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1998.
  60. N. Stokey, “Learning by doing and the introduction of new goods,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 96, pp. 701–717, 1988.
  61. A. Young, “Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, pp. 369–405, 1991.
  62. R. Lucas, “Making a Miracle,” Econometrica, vol. 6, pp. 251–272, 1993.
  63. R. Vernon, “International investment and international trade in the product cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 80, pp. 190–207, 1966.
  64. E. Helpman, “R&D and productivity: the international connection,” in The Economics of Globalisation: Policy Perspectives from Public Economics, A. Razin and E. Sadka, Eds., pp. 17–30, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  65. W. Hejazi and A. Safarian, “Trade, foreign direct investment, and R&D spillovers,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 491–511, 1999.
  66. R. Baldwin, H. Braconier, and R. Forslid, “Multinationals, endogenous growth and technological spillovers: theory and evidence,” Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 2155, 1999.
  67. B. Xu, “Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 477–493, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. D. Carr, J. Markusen, and K. Maskus, “Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise,” American Economic Review, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 693–708, 2001.
  69. J. Bhagwati and K. Hamada, “The brain drain, international integration of markets for professionals and unemployment: a theoretical analysis,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–42, 1974.
  70. O. Galor and O. Stark, “Migration, human capital formation, and long-run output,” in Migration: A Challenge for Europe, H. Siebert, Ed., pp. 59–68, J. C. B. Mohr, Tubingen, Germany, 1994.
  71. K. Shea and A. Woodfield, “Optimal immigration, education and growth in the long run,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 495–506, 1996.
  72. W. Keller, “Geographic localization of international technology diffusion,” American Economic Review, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 120–142, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. W. Keller, “Trade and the transmission of technology,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. P. Krugman, “A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 87, pp. 253–266, 1979.
  75. E. Dinopoulos, J. Oehmke, and P. Segerstrom, “High-technology-industry trade and investment: the role of factor endowments,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 34, no. 1-2, pp. 49–71, 1993.
  76. A. Glass, “Product cycles and market penetration,” International Economic Review, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 865–891, 1997.
  77. E. Mansfield and M. Swartz, “Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study,” Economic Journal, vol. 91, pp. 907–918, 1981.
  78. J. Sachs and A. Warner, “Economic reform and the process of global integration,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp. 1–95, 1995.
  79. R. Nelson and E. Phelps, “Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth,” American Economic Review, vol. 56, pp. 69–75, 1966.
  80. T. Veblen, Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution, Macmillan, London, UK, 1915.
  81. R. Findlay, “Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment and the transfer of technology: a simple dynamic model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 92, pp. 1–16, 1978.
  82. B. Verspagen, Uneven growth between interdependent economies: an evolutionary view of technology gaps, trade and growth, Ph.D. dissertation, Aldershot: Avebury, 1994.
  83. D. Quah, “Twin peaks: growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics,” Economic Journal, vol. 106, no. 437, pp. 1045–1055, 1996.
  84. D. Quah, “Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–59, 1997.
  85. E. Prescott, “Needed: a theory of total factor productivity,” International Economic Review, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 525–551, 1998.
  86. D. Acemoglu and F. Zilibotti, “Productivity differences,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 563–606, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. O. Afonso and R. H. Alves, “Can the North-South trade regime explain intra and inter-country productivity differences?” Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 561–595, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. S. Yeaple and S. Golub, “International productivity differences, infrastructure, and comparative advantage,” Review of International Economics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 223–242, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. E. Leamer and J. Levinsohn, “International trade theory: the evidence,” in Handbook of International Economics, Vol. III, G. Grossman and K. Rogoff, Eds., pp. 1339–1390, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
  90. W. Easterly and R. Levine, “Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development,” NBER Working Paper 9106, 2002.
  91. D. Acemoglu, S. Johnson, and J. Robinson, “Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth,” in Handbook of Economic Growth, P. Aghion and S. Durlauf, Eds., vol. 1, chapter 6, pp. 385–472, 1st edition, 2005.
  92. C. Jones, “Time series tests of endogenous growth models,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 495–525, 1995.
  93. C. Jones, “R&D-based models of economic growth,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 759–784, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. D. Backus, P. Kehoe, and T. Kehoe, “In search of scale effects in trade and growth,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 377–409, 1992.
  95. E. Dinopoulos and P. Thompson, “Scale effects in Schumpeterian models of economic growth,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 157–185, 1999.
  96. M. Zachariadis, “R&D, innovation, and technological progress: a test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects,” Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 566–586, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. C. Jones, “Growth: with or without scale effects?” American Economic Review, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 139–144, 1999.
  98. P. Segerstrom, “Endogenous growth without scale effects,” American Economic Review, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1290–1310, 1998.
  99. E. Dinopoulos and P. Segerstrom, “A Schumpeterian model of protection and relative wages,” American Economic Review, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 450–472, 1999.
  100. E. Dinopoulos and P. Segerstrom, “The dynamic effects of contingent tariffs,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 191–222, 1999.
  101. F. Sener, “Schumpeterian unemployment, trade and wages,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 119–148, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. E. Dinopoulos and P. Segerstrom, “North-South Trade and Economic Growth,” Mimeo, Stockholm School of Economics and CEPR, 2007.
  103. O. Afonso, “Skill-biased technological knowledge without scale effects,” Applied Economics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. G. Becker and K. Murphy, “The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107, pp. 1137–1160, 1992.
  105. D. Quah, “Ideas determining convergence clubs,” LSE, Working Paper, 1998, http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/dquah/p/9806ccb.pdf.
  106. A. Alesina and E. Spolaore, “On the number and size of nations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1026–1056, 1997.
  107. E. Dinopoulos and P. Thompson, “A contribution to the empirics of endogenous growth,” Eastern Economic Journal, vol. 22, pp. 389–400, 1996.
  108. N. Mankiw, D. Romer, and D. Weil, “A contribution to the empirics of economic growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107, pp. 407–437, 1992.
  109. P. Romer, “Human capital and growth: theory and evidence,” Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, vol. 32, pp. 251–286, 1990.
  110. R. Barro, “Economic growth in a cross section of countries,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 407–443, 1991.
  111. R. Barro, “Human capital and growth in cross-country regression,” Swedish Economic Review, vol. 6, pp. 237–277, 1999.
  112. R. Levine and D. Renelt, “A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions,” American Economic Review, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 942–963, 1992.
  113. J. Benhabib and M. Spiegel, “The role of human capital in economic development: evidence from aggregate cross-country and regional U.S. data,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 143–174, 1994.
  114. A. Krueger and M. Lindahl, “Education for growth: why and for whom?” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1101–1136, 2001.
  115. J. Temple, “A positive effect of human capital on growth,” Economics Letters, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 131–134, 1999.
  116. Z. Griliches, “Education, human capital, and growth: a personal perspective,” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 330–344, 1997.
  117. L. Pritchett, “Where has all the education gone?” The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 367–391, 2001.
  118. J. De Gregorio, “Economic growth in Latin America,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 59–84, 1992.
  119. M. Knight, N. Loayza, and D. Villanueva, “Testing the neoclassical theory of economic growth: a panel data approach,” IMF Staff Papers 40, 1993.
  120. N. Islam, “Growth empirics: a panel data approach,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, pp. 1127–1170, 1995.
  121. F. Caselli, G. Esquivel, and F. Lefort, “Reopening the convergence debate: a new look at cross-country growth empirics,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 363–389, 1996.
  122. H. Engelbrecht, “International R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in OECD economies: an empirical investigation,” European Economic Review, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1479–1488, 1997.
  123. A. Bartel and F. Litchtenberg, “The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technologies,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, pp. 1–11, 1987.
  124. J. Mincer, Studies in Human Capital: Collected Essays of Jacob Mincer, Edward Elgar, Cambridge, UK, 1993.
  125. J. Mincer, “Investment in U.S. education and training,” NBER Working Paper Series 4844, 1994.
  126. A. Bartel and N. Sicherman, “Technological change and the skill acquisition of young workers,” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 718–755, 1998.
  127. G. Becker, K. Murphy, and R. Tamura, “Human capital, fertility and economic growth,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, pp. S12–S37, 1990.
  128. N. Stokey, “Human capital, product quality and growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, pp. 587–616, 1991.
  129. M. Kiley, “The supply of skilled labour and skill-biased technological progress,” Economic Journal, vol. 109, no. 458, pp. 708–724, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. D. Thesmar and M. Thoenig, “Creative destruction and firm organization choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1201–1237, 2000.
  131. Ò. Afonso, “Growth and wage inequality in a scale-independent model with R&D and human-capital accumulation,” Manchester School, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 149–182, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  132. D. Acemoglu, “Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 1055–1089, 1998.
  133. D. Acemoglu, “Directed technical change,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 781–809, 2002.
  134. D. Acemoglu, “Technical change, inequality, and the labor market,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 7–72, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. D. Acemoglu, “Patterns of skill premia,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 199–230, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. J. Richardson, “Income inequality and trade: how to think, what to conclude,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 9, pp. 33–56, 1995.
  137. A. Wood, “Globalisation and the rise in labour market inequalities,” Economic Journal, vol. 108, no. 450, pp. 1463–1482, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. L. Katz and K. Murphy, “Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: supply and demand factors,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 35–78, 1992.
  139. E. Berman, J. Bound, and Z. Griliches, “Changes in the demand for skilled labor within US manufacturing industries: evidence from the annual survey of manufactures,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 367–398, 1994.
  140. C. Juhn, K. Murphy, and B. Pierce, “Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 410–442, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  141. D. Autor, L. Katz, and A. B. Krueger, “Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 1169–1213, 1998.
  142. E. Berman, J. Bound, and S. Machin, “Implications of skill-biased technological change: international evidence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 1245–1279, 1998.
  143. S. Machin and J. Van Reenen, “Technology and changes in skill structure: evidence from seven OECD countries,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 1215–1244, 1998.
  144. S. Gera, W. Gu, and Z. Lin, “Technology and the demand for skills in Canada: an industry-level analysis,” Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 132–148, 2001.
  145. D. Acemoglu, “Changes in unemployment and wage inequality: an alternative theory and some evidence,” American Economic Review, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1259–1278, 1999.
  146. P. Aghion, “Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality,” Econometrica, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 855–882, 2002.
  147. E. Caroli and J. Van Reenen, “Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 1449–1492, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  148. A. Wood, “How trade hurts unskilled workers,” Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 9, pp. 57–80, 1995.
  149. E. Leamer, “Trade, wages and revolving-door ideas,” NBER Working Paper 4716, 1994.
  150. E. Leamer, “Wage inequality from international competition and technological change: theory and country experience,” American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 309–314, 1996.
  151. M. Amiti and J. Konings, “Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: evidence from Indonesia,” American Economic Review, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1611–1638, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  152. P. Goldberg and N. Pavcnik, “Distributional effects of globalization in developing countries,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 39–82, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. P. Goldberg, A. Khandelwal, N. Pavcnik, and P. Topalova, “Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: evidence from India,” NBER Working Paper 14416, 2008.
  154. D. Acemoglu, “Labor- and capital-augmenting technical change,” Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  155. O. Afonso, “The impact of government intervention on wage inequality without scale effects,” Economic Modelling, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 351–362, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  156. D. A. Irwin and P. J. Klenow, “High-tech R&D subsidies: estimating the effects of SEMATECH,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 323–344, 1996.
  157. V. Maggioni, M. Sorrentino, and M. Williams, “Mixed consequences of government aid for new venture creation: evidence from Italy,” Journal of Management and Governance, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 287–305, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  158. G. Medda, C. Piga, and D. Siegel, “Assessing the returns to collaborative research: firm-level evidence from Italy,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 15, pp. 37–50, 2006.
  159. R. Hujer and D. Radic, “Evaluating the impacts of subsidies on innovation activities in Germany,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 565–586, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  160. D. Czarnitzki, P. Hanel, and J. M. Rosa, “Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation. A microeconometric study on Canadian firms,” ZEW Discussion Paper 04-77, Mannheim, Germany, 2004.
  161. D. Czarnitzki, B. Ebersberger, and A. Fier, “The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: empirical evidence from Finland and Germany,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1347–1366, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  162. P. Berger, “Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit,” Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 31, pp. 131–171, 1993.
  163. A. Goolsbee, “Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers?” American Economic Review, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 298–302, 1998.
  164. G. Cozzi and G. Impullitti, “Technology policy and wage inequality,” 2006, http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_89750_en.pdf.
  165. E. Lai, “International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 133–153, 1998.
  166. E. Lai and L. Qiu, “The North's intellectual property rights standard for the South?” Journal of International Economics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 183–209, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  167. A. Glass and K. Saggi, “Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 387–410, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  168. P. Smith, “How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses?” Journal of International Economics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 411–439, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  169. K. Maskus, “Encouraging Technology Transfer,” Report for UNCTAD/ICTSD Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development 7, 2004.
  170. L. Branstetter, R. Fisman, and C. Foley, “Do stronger intellectual property rights increase technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U. S. firm-level panel data,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 321–349, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  171. G. Yang and K. Maskus, “Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product-cycle model,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 169–187, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar