About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Economics Research International
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 428326, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/428326
Research Article

ISD: A New Methodological Approach for Measuring the Sustainability of the German Energy System

Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straβe, 52428 Jülich, Germany

Received 18 January 2011; Revised 21 April 2011; Accepted 6 May 2011

Academic Editor: Ali M. Kutan

Copyright © 2011 Holger Schlör et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Nordhaus and J. Tobin, Is growth obsolete?Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1972.
  2. C. W. Cobb and J. B. Cobb, Eds., The Green National Product—A proposed Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, USA, 1994.
  3. E. Neumayer, Ed., Weak versus strong sustainability, Edward Eldgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 1999.
  4. E. Neumayer, Weak Versus Strong Sustainability. Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2003.
  5. P. Bartelmus, “SEEA-2003: Accounting for sustainable development?” Ecological Economics, vol. 61, pp. 613–616, 2007.
  6. P. Bartelmus, “Green accounting,” in Encyclopedia of Earth, 2007.
  7. J. R. Vincent, “Green accounting: from theory to practice,” Environment and Development Economics, vol. 5, pp. 13–24, 2000.
  8. United Nations, Agenda 21, United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  9. United Nations, Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
  10. United Nations, Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  11. United Nations, Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  12. O. J. Kuik and A. J. Gilbert, “Indicators of sustainable development,” in Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, J. C. J. M. Van Den Bergh, Ed., pp. 722–730, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2002.
  13. H. Bossel, Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications. A Report to the Balaton Group, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 1999.
  14. German Federal Government, Perspectives for Germany—Our Strategy for Sustainable Development, German Federal Government, Berlin, Germany, 2002.
  15. H. Wiesmeth, Umweltökonomie, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2003.
  16. H. Schlör, J.-F. Hake, and R. Eich, “Evaluation of the German sustainability strategy,” World Resource Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 391–416, 2004.
  17. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987.
  18. H. Funke, G. Hacker, and J. Voeller, “Fishers circular test reconsidered,” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, vol. 115, pp. 677–688, 1979.
  19. M. Ahlheim, “Wohlfahrtsmessung im Umweltbereich,” in Wohlfahrtsmessung—Aufgabe der Statistik im gesellschaftlichen Wandel, J. Chlumsky and R. Wiegert, Eds., pp. 199–217, Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden, Germany, 1996.
  20. M. Ahlheim and M. Rose, “Alte und neue Maße individueller Steuerlasten,” FinanzArchiv, vol. 42, pp. 274–339, 1984.
  21. M. Ahlheim and M. Rose, Messung individueller Wohlfahrt, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1989.
  22. A. C. Harberger, Taxation, Resource Allocation, and Welfare, National Bureau of Economic Research and the Brookings Institution, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1964.
  23. A. C. Harberger, “Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: an interpretive essay,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 785–797, 1971.
  24. I. Fisher, “The best form of index number,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 17, no. 133, pp. 535–537, 1921.
  25. I. Fisher, The Making of Index Numbers: A Study of Their Varieties, Tests, and Reliability, Houghton Boston, New York, NY, USA, 1927.
  26. N. G. Pierson, “Further considerations on index-numbers,” The Economic Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 127–131, 1896.
  27. W. M. Lafferty, “The politics of sustainable development: global norms for national implementation,” Environmental Politics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 185–208, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. W. Lafferty and J. Meadowcraft, Implementing Sustainable Development: Strategies and Initiatives in High Consumption Societies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2000.
  29. Umweltbundesamt, “Nationale Trendtabellen für die deutsche Berichterstattung atmosphärischer Emissionen seit 1990,” 2008, http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/emissionen/publikationen.
  30. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Energiedaten 2006, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Berlin, Germany, 2006, http://www.bmwi.de/Navigation/Technologie-und-Energie/Energiepolitik/energiedaten.html.
  31. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Energiedaten 2008, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Berlin, Germany, 2008, http://www.bmwi.de/Navigation/Technologie-und-Energie/Energiepolitik/energiedaten.html.
  32. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen E.V., Auswertungstabellen zur Energiebilanz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1990–2005, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen e.V., Berlin, Germany, 2006.
  33. Arbeitsgruppe Umweltökonomische Gesamtrechnungen der Länder, Umweltökonomische Gesamtrechnungen der Länder Rohstoff- und Materialflüsse Analysen und Ergebnisse, Landesamt für Datenverarbeitung und Statistik Nordrhein, Düsseldorf, Germany, 2006.
  34. Statistisches Bundesamt, Umweltökonomische Gesamtrechnungen (UGR)—Ziele, Konzepte und methodische Grenzen, Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden, Germany, 2002.