About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Economics Research International
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 732583, 8 pages
Research Article

A Case Study of Probit Model Analysis of Factors Affecting Consumption of Packed and Unpacked Milk in Turkey

1Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey
2Department of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey

Received 6 August 2012; Revised 7 September 2012; Accepted 25 September 2012

Academic Editor: Anthony N. Rezitis

Copyright © 2012 Meral Uzunoz and Yasar Akcay. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. E. N. Alwis, J. C. Edirisinghe, and A. M. T. P. Athauda, “Analysis of factors affecting fresh milk consumption among the mid-country consumers,” Tropical Agricultural Research & Extension, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 101–107, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. A. Hatirli, B. Ozkan, and A. R. Aktas, “Factors affecting fluid milk purchasing sources in Turkey,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 509–515, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Yayar, “Consumer characteristics influencing milk consumption preference: the Turkey case,” Theoretical and Applied Economics, vol. 7, no. 572, pp. 25–42, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  4. OECD/FAO, OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011–2020, OECD Publishing and FAO, 2011.
  5. M. V. Pazarlioǧlu, B. Miran, Ş. Üçdoǧruk, and C. Abay, “Using econometric modelling to predict demand for fluid and farm milk: a case study from Turkey,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 416–424, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. WMDA, “Dairy and Products Sectoral Report, West Mediterranean Development Agency,” 2011, http://baka.org.tr/uploads/1303486719SUT-URUNLERi-TURKCE-KATALOG.pdf.
  7. AEPDI, Dairy Situation and Outlook: 2011–2012, Agricultural Economics and Policy Development Institute, Ankara, Turkey, 2011.
  8. C. Günden, A. Bilgic, B. Miran, and B. Karli, “A censored system of demand analysis to unpacked and prepackaged milk consumption in Turkey,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1273–1290, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Akbay and G. Y. Tiryaki, “Unpacked and packed fluid milk consumption patterns and preferences in Turkey,” Agricultural Economics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. H. Fuller, J. C. Beghin, and S. Rozelle, “Urban demand for dairy products in china: evidence from new survey data,” Working Paper 04-WP 380, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University Ames, Ames, Iowa, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. H. Hill and F. Lynchehaun, “Organic milk: attitudes and consumption patterns,” British Food Journal, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 526–542, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. I. V. Alviola and O. Capps Jr., Household Demand Analysis of Organic and Conventional Fluid Milk in the United States, Department of Agricultural Economics—Texas A&M University, Research Report, 2009.
  13. O. Kilic, C. Akbay, and G. Y. Tiryaki, “Factors affecting packed and unpacked fluid milk consumption,” Agricultural Economics, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 557–563, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Negassa, “Improving smallholder farmers’marketed supply and market access for dairy products in Arsi Zone, Ethiopia,” Research Report 21, ILRI, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  15. O. Simsek, C. Cetin, and B. Bilgin, “A research on determination of the drinking milk consuming habits and the factors affecting these habits in istanbul province,” Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  16. G. Y. Tiryaki and C. Akbay, “Consumers' fluid milk consumption behaviors in TURKEY: an application of multinomial logit model,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Yamane, Basic Sampling Methods, Literatur Publishing, Istanbul, Turkey, 2001.
  18. TURKSTAT, “Regional Statistics, Population of Households,” 2009, http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/Bolgesel/tabloOlustur.do.
  19. UNDP, “Human Development Report (Turkey),” 2004, http://www.undp.org.
  20. G. Armagan and C. Akbay, “An econometric analysis of urban households' animal products consumption in Turkey,” Applied Economics, vol. 40, no. 15, pp. 2029–2036, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. A. Khan, “Effect of asian-origin ethnicity on pork consumption evidence from the family food expenditure survey (Statistics Canada),” Crossing Boundaries, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–44, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  22. CBRT, “Statistical Data, Exchanges Rates 2010. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey,” 2010, http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/eng.
  23. T. F. Liao, Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models, 101, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 1994.
  24. J. H. Aldrich and F. D. Nelson, Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif, USA, 1984.
  25. W. H. Greene, Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, 7th Edition edition, 2011.
  26. Y. Peng, G. E. West, and C. Wang, “Consumer attitudes and acceptance of CLA-enriched dairy products,” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 663–684, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Vandermersch and E. Mathus, “Consumer Willings to Pay for Domestic Milk. Working Paper, No:91, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Vandermersch Leuven,” 2004, http://www.agr.kuleuven.ac.be/aee/clo/wp/Vandermersch2004.pdf.
  28. Y. Celik, A. Bilgic, B. Karli, and S. Celik, “Factors affecting milk consumption pattern in Southern Anatolian Region: an application of a two-stage econometric model,” Bodenkultur, vol. 57, no. 1–4, pp. 57–64, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Lefevre, “Willingness-to-pay for Local Milk-based Dairy Products in Senegal,” Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique et de La Population CREPP WP 2011/08, Boulevard Du Rectorat 7 (B31), Liège, Belgium, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  30. UN, “World Statistics Pocketbook,” 2011, http://data.un.org/CountryProfile.aspx?crName=TURKEY.
  31. TURKSTAT, Turkey’s Statistical Yearbook, 2010, Ankara, Turkey, 2011.
  32. WMDA, Sectoral Report of Dairy Products in Turkey, West Mediterranean Development Agency, Antalya, Turkey, 2011.
  33. V. K. Borooah, Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multinomial Models. Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Science, vol. 138, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2002.
  34. A. Sanchez-Villegas, J. A. Martínez, R. Prättälä, E. Toledo, G. Roos, and M. A. Martínez-González, “A systematic review of socioeconomic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of cheese and milk,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 917–929, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Dong and H. M. Kaiser, “Dissecting the advertising effects on Household Milk Purchases,” Nicpre Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  36. W. Zhang and Q. Wang, Changes in China’s Urban Food Consumption and Implications for Trade, American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, 2003.
  37. A. E. M. Bus and A. Worsley, “Consumers' health perceptions of three types of milk: a survey in Australia,” Appetite, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Jonas and J. Roosen, “Demand for milk labels in Germany: organic milk, conventional brands, and retail labels,” Agribusiness, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 192–206, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus