About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Economics Research International
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 846326, 10 pages
Research Article

Permissiveness toward Illegal Actions in Uruguay: Has This Attitude Changed in Time?

1Universidad de la República, Montevidro, Uruguay
2Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain

Received 21 March 2012; Revised 15 June 2012; Accepted 18 July 2012

Academic Editor: Philip J. Grossman

Copyright © 2012 Natalia Melgar and Máximo Rossi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Cábelková, “Perceptions of corruption in Ukraine: are they correct?” CERGE-EI working paper 176, 2001.
  2. H. Werlin, “The consequences of corruption: the ghanaian experience,” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 71–85, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. K. Blackburn, N. Bose, and M. E. Haque, “Endogenous corruption in economic development,” Working Paper 2004/16, University of Nottingham, 2004.
  4. A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, “Corruption,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 599–617, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Maingot, “Confronting corruption in the hemisphere: a sociological perspective,” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 49–74, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. N. Melgar, M. Rossi, and T. W. Smith, “The perception of corruption,” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 120–131, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Melgar, G. Piani, and M. Rossi, “Are there differences between perception of corruption at public and private sector? A multi-country analysis,” Working Paper 09-01, Departamento de Economia, 2009.
  8. X. Xin and T. K. Rudel, “The context for political corruption: a cross-national analysis,” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 294–309, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Moreno, “Corruption and democracy: a cultural assessment,” Comparative Sociology, vol. 1, no. 3-4, pp. 495–507, 2002. View at Scopus
  10. E. Ghersi, Economía de la corrupción, Centro de la Divulgación del Conocimiento Económico, Caracas, Venezuela, 2006.
  11. T. W. Smith, “Factors relating to misanthropy in contemporary American society,” Social Science Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 170–196, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J.-S. You and S. Khagram, “A comparative study of inequality and corruption,” American Sociological Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 136–157, 2005. View at Scopus
  13. C. L. Davis, R. A. Camp, and K. M. Coleman, “The influence of party systems on citizens' perceptions of corruption and electoral response in Latin America,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 677–703, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Canache and M. E. Allison, “Perceptions of political corruption in Latin American democracies,” Latin American Politics & Society, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 91–111, 2005. View at Scopus