Copyright © 2008 Gunilla T. Westermark and Per Westermark. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The almost constantly appearing amyloid deposits in islets of Langerhans
of individuals with type 2 diabetes was for long time regarded as more or less
innocent bystanders. Even after that the amyloid was shown to be an aggregated
form of a novel polypeptide hormone, islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP or
amylin), the deposits themselves attracted little interest. This can appear
peculiar today and is in sharp contrast to another localized form of amyloid
deposition occurring in the brain particularly in association with Alzheimer's
disease. The protein forming the brain amyloid, Aβ-peptide, was discovered just two years (1984) before IAPP (1986), and
aggregation of Aβ became immediately a central issue in the studies of the pathogenesis
of Alzheimer's disease. So, why did almost the whole research field on senile
and presenile dementia so rapidly focus on amyloid while most diabetologists,
with a few exceptions, disregarded islet amyloid? A possible reason is that
while Alzheimer researchers fumbled after a possible pathogenic mechanism for
the brain pathology, the research field of type 2 diabetes was already
established and in a high degree directed towards the development of insulin
resistance. Many researchers regarded the obvious failure of beta-cells only as
a secondary event due to some elusive mechanism of “glucose toxicity.” In
addition, experimentalists in diabetes research most often used mice or rats as
models, and in these species, islet amyloid cannot develop due to the amino acid
sequence of their IAPP molecules.
After the discovery of IAPP, there
was a strong interest in the possible physiological role of the molecule and in
the effect it may have on the development of type 2 diabetes. It was found
early that the peptide induces insulin insensitivity in peripheral tissues.
However, this effect was reached only after nonphysiological levels of IAPP.
More established effects of the peptide include regulation of satiety, gastric
emptying and para- or autocrine signalling of insulin, and glucagon secretion. All these effects seem to modulate the action
of insulin, leading to a more even blood glucose level. Since IAPP is a
beta-cell product and these cells are lost in type 1 diabetes, IAPP in a
modified form has been introduced as supplement to insulin treatment.
Today, however, we can note an
increasing interest in the importance of the development of IAPP-derived islet
amyloid on the beta-cell function. Earlier it was believed that islet amyloid
could not be of any significance since even in cases with pronounced deposits,
there are always well-granulated beta-cells left. There are two essentially new
findings that are of particularly great interest. First, islet amyloid may
initially assemble intracellularly with severe consequences for the affected cell.
Second, there is growing evidence that small, oligomeric, prefibrillar
aggregates of IAPP are directly toxic to beta-cells. Interestingly, there is
also increasing evidence that this reflects a generic mechanism common to many
protein aggregates in which beta-sheet formation are essential. Such aggregates
of often completely nonrelated peptides seem to have similar or identical
effects on cells. It is still very incompletely understood which these effects are. Eventually, the interactions may lead to cell death, and
aggregated IAPP is a strong candidate as an important cause of beta-cell loss
in type 2 diabetes. Cell death and accumulation of diffuse amyloid deposits within
the islet of Langerhans are sufficient to destroy the islet architecture which
is important for maintaining optimal signaling.
The finding that isolated normal
human islets, transplanted into nude mice, very rapidly develop IAPP-derived
amyloid deposits intra- and extracellularly, lead to the suspicion that such an
event could be an important cause of the loss of function of islets
transplanted into type 1 diabetic individuals. This hypothesis was recently
strongly supported by the analysis of a liver of a deceased person, who had
received intraportal islet transplants on three occasions. Almost 50% of
identified islets were found to contain amyloid deposits. Obviously, this may
mean that a beta-cell lesion, typical of type 2 diabetes, may develop in originally
normal islets transplanted into a type 1 diabetic individual. Methods to
inhibit amyloid formation may be important to develop in order to prolong the
survival of transplanted islets.
The present issue of Experimental
Diabetes Research deals with different aspects of islet amyloid and IAPP. We
hope that the papers will lead to further interest in this field which
sometimes has been neglected in diabetes research.
Gunilla T. Westermark
Per Westermark