About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Education Research International
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 184640, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/184640
Review Article

Reviewing Teacher Evaluation of Rewards and Punishments: The Overview of Chinese Teacher Evaluation Research

School of Education, Northwest Normal University, Gansu, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received 17 September 2012; Accepted 24 October 2012

Academic Editor: Hoi Yan Cheung

Copyright © 2012 Wang Jiayi and Cheng Ling. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Wang, “Teacher evaluation model: contract plan method,” Forum on Contemporary Education, vol. 5, pp. 5–8, 2003.
  2. B. Wang, “Teacher evaluation model: teaching portfolio,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 7, pp. 24–28, 2004.
  3. B. Wang, “Teacher evaluation model:the microteaching evaluation method,” Global Education, vol. 9, pp. 43–47, 2004.
  4. B. Wang, “Teacher evaluation: a review of the elimination system,” Global Education, vol. 12, pp. 62–66, 2004.
  5. B. Wang, “Teacher evaluation: performance evaluation method,” Global Education, vol. 5, pp. 47–51, 2005.
  6. B. Wang, “Teacher evaluation: value-added assessment method,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 12, pp. 20–23, 2005.
  7. Y. Cai and H. Tianyuan, “The origin, problem and its development trend of teacher evaluation study,” Journal of Beijing Normal University, vol. 1, pp. 130–136, 2003.
  8. Y. Cai, “Review and reflection on teacher performance assessment studies,” Teacher Education Research, vol. 5, pp. 73–76, 2001.
  9. Y. Cai and C. Lin, “Theory and practice of teacher performance evaluation,” Teacher Education Research, vol. 1, pp. 36–41, 2005.
  10. Y. Cai, L. Chongde, and C. Xuefeng, “Confirmatory factor analysis of students' evaluations on teacher performance,” Acta Psychologica Sinica, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 362–369, 2003.
  11. Y. Liu, “The theories and models of developing teacher evaluation,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 12, pp. 28–32, 2001.
  12. X. Zhao, “The development trend of the overseas development of teacher evaluation,” Comparative Education Research, vol. 1, pp. 72–75, 2003.
  13. L. Wu, et al., “Developing teacher evaluation exploration,” Exploring Education Development, vol. 4-5, pp. 169–172, 2003.
  14. Q. Li, “The development teacher evaluation and teacher growth,” Education Review, vol. 3, pp. 44–46, 2002.
  15. Q. Li, “The comparative of two teacher evaluation systems research,” Journal of Teaching and Management, vol. 8, pp. 23–25, 2002.
  16. B. Wang, The System of Appraisal for Development, East China Normal University Press, Shanghai, China, 1998.
  17. Y. Zhao, “Traditional teacher evaluation and development of teachers evaluation comparative study,” Liaoning Education Research, vol. 10, pp. 45–46, 2001.
  18. Y. Liu and Z. Weixin, “A study of developing teacher evaluation,” Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, vol. 10, pp. 55–56, 2002.
  19. W. Chen, “Play the incentive function of development teacher evaluation,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 10, pp. 17–18, 2003.
  20. B. Chen and X. Bingou, “Build development teacher evaluation system—teacher professionalism perspective,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 5, pp. 50–53, 2006.
  21. B. Wang, “The comparison of rewards and punishments and developing teacher evaluation system,” Shanghai Research on Education, vol. 12, pp. 39–41, 2007.
  22. J. Yang and W. Zhuo, “On the relationship between the development evaluation and reward and punishment evaluation of teachers,” Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, vol. 1, pp. 46–48, 2003.
  23. J. Yang and W. Zhuo, “On the essence of China's development of teacher evaluation,” Education Science, vol. 2, pp. 14–16, 2005.
  24. Q. Zhang, “Examination and Consideration of developing teacher evaluation—a dialogue with Professor Wang Binhua,” Educational Research and Experiment, vol. 1, pp. 61–64, 2005.
  25. Q. Zhang, “Review of one conclusion of the system of appraisal for development—a dialogue with Professor Wang Binhua,” Comparative Education Research, vol. 4, pp. 86–90, 2005.
  26. R. Li, “Composite evaluation: a rational choice of the teacher evaluation,” School Management, vol. 3, pp. 16–18, 2003.
  27. W. Guo and D. Zhiming, “Exploration and research of the domestic teacher evaluation system,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 9, pp. 39–41, 2007.
  28. X. Zhu, Jiangchengxing Jiaoshi Pingjia he Fazhanxing Jiaoshi Pingjia de Zhenghe Yanjiu, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China, 2005.
  29. X. Zeng, “Combing of primary and secondary teacher performance evaluation process,” Teacher Education Research, vol. 1, pp. 47–51, 2004.
  30. L. Duan and Y. Limin, “On the, "people-oriented" teacher performance evaluation,” University Education Science, vol. 4, pp. 64–67, 2003.
  31. F. Hu, “Aphasia and noise—the discourse phenomena in teacher evaluation practice,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 12, pp. 30–34, 2002.
  32. C. Hou, “Teachers' reflective self-evaluation,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 4, pp. 27–32, 2003.
  33. Y. Xu, “On the "good teacher"-"teacher evaluation" evaluation,” Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, vol. 11, pp. 45–51, 1997.
  34. J. Yu, “The positioning and the basis of the teacher evaluation reform,” Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, vol. 9, pp. 67–70, 2001.
  35. X. Zhang, “Three basic questions of the current teacher evaluation critique: postmodern perspective,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 10, pp. 32–35, 2004.
  36. B. Wang, “An analysis of teacher evaluation methods and main application,” Teacher Education Research, vol. 1, pp. 42–50, 2005.
  37. X. Liu, “On the construction and operating strategy of the teachers' development evaluation model,” Journal of Education Development, vol. 12, pp. 42–44, 2004.
  38. J. Wang, “Professional development of teachers and teachers' self-evaluation,” Teacher Education Research, vol. 3, pp. 26–31, 2002.
  39. X. Wang, “The new progress of the teacher evaluation system in the United Kingdom -and PRP system plan commentary,” Comparative Education Research, vol. 3, pp. 43–47, 2002.
  40. P. Ying and F. Guorui, “A case studies on teacher evaluation model,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 3, pp. 22–25, 2001.
  41. B. Ou and L. Junju, “An analysis of the main in diverse teachers evaluation,” Journal of Chongqing University, vol. 2, article 129, 2004.
  42. J. Li, “Study the combination of self-evaluation and others-evaluation in the education evaluation activities,” Education Review, vol. 1, pp. 36–38, 1999.
  43. B. Wang, “Teacher evaluation criteria research,” Teachers Education Research, vol. 11, pp. 53–57, 2009.
  44. J. Zhang, “Teacher evaluation and academic moral construction,” China University Teaching, vol. 9, pp. 8–9, 2002.
  45. H. Yang, “Problems and solution strategies of China's teacher evaluation methods,” Journal of Liaoning Normal University, vol. 9, pp. 55–56, 2001.
  46. J. Shen, “A lot of problems in the teacher evaluation system need to urgent reconstruction,” China Education Daily, vol. 14, article 6, 2009.
  47. Y. Tu, “British teacher evaluation summary,” Studies in Foreign Education, vol. 5, pp. 54–57, 1993.
  48. B. Wang, “Teacher evaluation system—the major initiatives of the British educational reform,” Foreign Education Data, vol. 1, pp. 28–34, 1995.
  49. F. Mu, “Teacher evaluation system in British,” School Management, vol. 4, pp. 44–45, 1998.
  50. A. Tang, et al., “The impact analysis of British PRP teacher evaluation system for teachers' professional development,” Global Education, vol. 10, article 80, 2005.
  51. K. Wang and Z. Wenhua, “Yingguo jichu jiaoyu jiaoshi pingjia zhidu gaige pingjian,” Studies in Foreign Education, vol. 12, pp. 68–72, 2006.
  52. M. Xu, “Evaluation system and the characteristics of the British primary and secondary school teachers,” Studies Foreign Education, vol. 12, pp. 45–49, 2002.
  53. B. Cai and C. Yanwei, “The new system of British teachers' classroom teaching evaluation: concepts, standards and the effect of implementation,” Global Education, vol. 1, pp. 67–71, 2008.
  54. W. Che, The Experience and Enlightenment of Performance Management Teacher Evaluation System in British Primary and Middle Schools, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China, 2009.
  55. B. Sun and S. Jiliang, “The history and models of teacher evaluation in US,” Comparative Education Review, vol. 5, pp. 73–76, 2009.
  56. Q. Zhan, “The comparative of teacher evaluation system in UK and US,” Elementary and Schooling Abroad, vol. 1, pp. 18–20, 1998.
  57. Y. Wang, “Test method in the U.S. teacher evaluation,” Foreign Education News, vol. 3, pp. 42–43, 1990.
  58. A. Tian, “Evaluation system of the United States based on the teachers' behavior,” Studies in Foreign Education, vol. 4, pp. 15–18, 2003.
  59. X. Lu and B. Wuyun, “The reform and development trend of the teacher evaluation system in America,” Education Research, vol. 10, article 93, 2002.
  60. C. Xiang, “The course of development of the latest reform movements of the teacher evaluation,” Studies in Foreign Education, vol. 9, pp. 63–65, 2006.
  61. R. Miao and Z. Xiaolei, “From teacher education technology capability assessment to senior teacher certification,” China Educational Technology, vol. 10, pp. 11–15, 2010.
  62. Y. Xiao and G. Jun, “Contemporary American exploration of teacher evaluation criteria,” Education Exploration, vol. 3, pp. 142–143, 2008.
  63. W. Wang, “Reform of teacher evaluation in the context of the performance system and its implications,” Elementary and Secondary Schooling Abroad, vol. 10, pp. 27–31, 2011.
  64. W. Pang, The Research on American Value-Added Assessment of Teachers in the Elementary and Secondary Schools, vol. 4, Southwest University, Chongqing, China, 2009.
  65. D. Hou, L. Gu, and Z. Wang, “The new trends of the reform of teacher evaluation in America,” Global Education, vol. 10, pp. 72–75, 2005.
  66. M. Cai, “The useful experience of the teachers evaluation reform in American primary and secondary schools,” Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, vol. 7, pp. 65–68, 2007.
  67. C. Zhou and J. Yongtao, “The three themes of the teacher evaluation study in American,” Studies Foreign Education, vol. 1, pp. 1–6, 2007.
  68. M. Luo, “Teacher evaluation and school effectiveness research in America,” Heilongjiang Researchs on High Education, vol. 3, pp. 65–68, 2010.
  69. H. Sun, Z. Dan, and G. Hui, “Comparison and enlightenment of the evaluation index system of teacher of China and America,” Exploring Education Development, vol. 20, pp. 54–58, 2008.
  70. N. Yang, American Differentiated Teacher Evaluation System—Experience and Enligntenment, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China, 2007.
  71. S. Li and C. Min, “American skilled teachers performance evaluation and its implications,” Studies in Foreign Education, vol. 11, pp. 81–84, 2008.
  72. S. Liu and L. Xingfa, “An exploration of teaching evaluation method in the new curriculum concept—review of the United States teaching portfolio,” Studies in Foreign Education, vol. 5, pp. 30–34, 2002.
  73. S. Yin and C. Fu, “American teachers teaching portfolio assessment on the revelation of our kindergarten teacher evaluation,” Studies in Preschool Education, vol. 9, pp. 50–53, 2008.
  74. H. Ma, “Teaching portfolio development—a new path for teachers' professional development and evaluation,” Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 1, pp. 11–16, 2010.
  75. A. Xie and L. Xiao, “Electronic portfolio in teacher evaluation,” Global Education, vol. 11, pp. 76–80, 2005.
  76. H. Ma, “Review of the U.S. teaching portfolio assessment,” Comparative Education Review, vol. 1, pp. 78–82, 2004.
  77. S. Xu and H. Qingxiang, “The inspiration to improve the quality of adult education about the American teacher evaluation system,” China Adult Education, vol. 2, pp. 124–126, 2007.