- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Emergency Medicine International
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 313404, 1 page
Imaging and Resuscitation in Trauma
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
2Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard University, Boston, MA 02114, USA
3University of Manchester and Manchester Medical Academic Health Sciences Center, Manchester M139PL, UK
4Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospital, University of Manchester, Salford M68HD, UK
5Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University and University of Cape Town, Provincial Government of the Western Cape, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa
6Radiology Department, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
Received 3 October 2011; Accepted 3 October 2011
Copyright © 2011 Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Injury is expected to become the second leading cause of death by 2020 .
The initial evaluation of a critically injured polytrauma patient is a challenging task and every minute can make the difference between life and death. It has been shown that mortality decreases as the time from injury to diagnosis and treatment is shortened . Over the past few years, the assessment of trauma patients has evolved, due to the improved understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to morbidity and mortality in trauma, and this has led to the development of advanced trauma life support.
Because hemorrhagic shock is the second leading cause of death after trauma, the optimal treatment for bleeding has become a major priority. In their paper, V. Jeger et al. “The role of thromboelastography in multiple trauma” describe thrombelastography (TEG) as a very useful tool in managing bleeding patients, and we suspect that this procedure will become a gold standard of resuscitation during the next decade. Since fluid resuscitation is one of the major tasks in the management and treatment of severely burned patients, the paper by M. Stander et al. “The emergency management and treatment of severe burns” is really significant, as it presents a simple guideline for the initial management of severe burns, as utilised by the South African Burn Society.
But what would treatment be without imaging? Quick and cost-effective imaging has become one of the cornerstones of modern trauma management. R. Kaewlai et al. “Blunt cardiac injury in trauma patients with thoracic aortic injury” and P. D. Levy et al. “Micropower impulse radar: a novel technology for rapid, real-time detection of pneumothorax” present some very promising data on detecting injuries of the heart and lungs. Micropower impulse radar, for example, is a novel technology for the rapid detection of pneumothorax, with the power to simplify decision making in the prehospital sector as well as in the trauma bay and to reduce the burden of radiation for patients and staff. Since no technology is perfect and any 100% sensitivity and specificity margin for diagnosing injuries is a myth, we focus on the importance of the followup of trauma patients and raise the awareness for even rare but potentially life-threatening complications.
Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos
Marc A. de Moya
Lee Alan Wallis
Robert A. Novelline
- E. G. Krug, G. K. Sharma, and R. Lozano, “The global burden of injuries,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 523–526, 2000.