Emergency Medicine International / 2011 / Article / Tab 2 / Clinical Study
Effect of a Targeted Women's Health Intervention in an Inner-City Emergency Department Table 2 Comparison of characteristics of patients lost to followup versus those not lost, and relative risk of loss to followup. Please see Table
1 for key to abbreviations. *: Indicates
𝑃
<
0
.
0
5
.
Lost + (
𝑛
=
2
4
9
) Not lost (
𝑛
=
7
3
) Relative risk
𝑃
valueAge mean: 39.33 mean: 41.26
𝑃
=
0
.
1
4
6
6
Marital status: Single 70.7% 63.0% Ref. Separated 10.4% 13.7% 0.9
𝑃
=
0
.
2
9
5
7
Divorced 11.2% 9.6% 1.01
𝑃
=
0
.
9
2
2
0
Widowed* 0.4% 5.5% 0.25
𝑃
=
0
.
0
0
8
9
Now married 7.2% 8.2% 0.95
𝑃
=
0
.
6
2
5
7
Education: <9th grade 8.4% 1.4% 1.3
𝑃
=
0
.
0
2
3
8
Some HS 24.5% 20.5% 1.1
𝑃
=
0
.
2
6
7
3
High school* 34.1% 42.5% Ref. Some college* 22.5% 31.5% 0.97
𝑃
=
0
.
7
1
4
3
College* 10.0% 4.1% 1.22
𝑃
=
0
.
0
7
3
4
Screening results: ISA-P +* 23.4% 12.3% 1.16
𝑃
=
0
.
0
4
2
4
ISA-NP + 24.9% 16.4% 1.1
𝑃
=
0
.
1
6
7
3
HONC + 76.3% 74.0% 1.03
𝑃
=
0
.
6
8
2
5
TWEAK +* 46.6% 60.3% 0.88
𝑃
=
0
.
0
3
9
7
DAST + 26.1% 28.8% 0.97
𝑃
=
0
.
6
5
1
1
BDI + 26.5% 27.4% 0.99
𝑃
=
0
.
8
7
9
7
Intervention 53.0% 46.6% 1.06
𝑃
=
0
.
3
3
3
2
