Research Article

Emergency Department Discharge Instructions: Lessons Learned through Developing New Patient Education Materials

Table 1

Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM)#.

DiagnosisCommercially availableNew
Score/possible pointsSuitability rating*Score/possible pointsSuitability rating*

Laceration care9/30 (30.0%)Not suitable material22/30 (73.3%)Superior material
Kidney stone8/38 (21.0%)Not suitable material21/38 (55.3%)Adequate material
Head injury9/38 (23.7%)Not suitable material18/30 (60.0%)Adequate material
Back pain7/38 (18.4%)Not suitable material19/30 (63.3%)Adequate material
Ankle sprain13/38 (34.2%)Not suitable material24/38 (63.2%)Adequate material

#Number of possible points varies (30 for items without illustration, 38 for items with illustrations); interrater agreement 81.61%.
*The percent score correlates to three suitability ratings: 0–39%: “not suitable material”; 40–69%: “adequate material”; 70–100%: “superior material.”