Research Article
Comparison of i-Gel as a Conduit for Intubation between under Fiberoptic Guidance and Blind Endotracheal Intubation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Simulation Study
Table 3
Comparisons of intubation time among three intubation techniques according to the kinds of endotracheal tubes.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§ considered for significant difference by using Bonferroni’s correction. considered for significant difference by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test in the comparison between PVC and WRS tubes. MCL = Macintosh laryngoscopy; IGI = i-gel blind intubation; IBRI = i-gel bronchoscopic intubation; VET = vocal cord exposure time; IIT = i-gel insertion time; TPT = tube pass time; FVT = first ventilation time; PVC = polyvinyl chloride endotracheal tube; WRS = wire-reinforced silicone endotracheal tube. |