Research Article

Evaluating the Sealing Effectiveness of a Caprock-Fault System for CO2-EOR Storage: A Case Study of the Shengli Oilfield

Table 1

Indicators and ranking system for a caprock-fault system for CO2-EOR storage [27, 30, 3740].

IIIIII
Specific indicators
Very GoodGoodNormalPoorVery Poor
54321

Fault caprock sealing system CaprockDisplacement work (MPa·m)>63002100~6300350~2100<350
Porosity (%)<55~1010~15>15
Permeability (mD)<0.10.1~1.871.87~10>10
Shale content (%)>7575~5050~25<25
Well density (/10 km)01~23~55~10>10
FaultFault activity timeTrancheSyngeneticMultiperiod
Configuration relationship between fault extension and caprockEmbedded typeLower broken typeBroken-through type
Configuration relationship between fault throw and direct caprock thicknessIntact top seal typeSeal connected typeSeal apart type
Fault dip angle (°)≤4545~75>75
Fault lateral displacement work (MPa·m)>302.5~30<2.5
Fault vertical displacement work (MPa·m)>63002100~6300350~2100<350
Fault lateral permeability (mD)<0.0010.001~0.01870.0187~0.1>0.1
Fault vertical permeability (mD)<0.0010.001~0.01870.0187~0.1>0.1
Fault tightness coefficient>1<1
Shale smear factor<44~7>7
Clay smear potential>3515~35<15
Shale gouge ratio>0.50.3~0.5<0.3