Clinical Validation of an Office-Based <sup>14</sup>C-UBT (Heliprobe) for <i>H. pylori</i> Diagnosis in Iranian Dyspeptic Patients

Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz; Sanaei, Omid; Joukar, Farahnaz

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/930941

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 930941 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/930941

Clinical Validation of an Office-Based ¹⁴C-UBT (Heliprobe) for H. pylori Diagnosis in Iranian Dyspeptic Patients

Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei,¹Omid Sanaei,²and Farahnaz Joukar¹

Academic Editor: Y. Yamaoka

Received08 Apr 2011

Revised23 Apr 2011

Accepted28 Apr 2011

Published22 Jun 2011

Abstract

Background. We encountered repeatedly, in our clinical practice, discordant results between UBT and histopathology about H. pylori infection. Goal. To study the diagnostic accuracy of Heliprobe ¹⁴C-urea breath test (¹⁴C-UBT) for detection of H. pylori infection in an Iranian population. Study. We enrolled 125 dyspeptic patients in our study. All of them underwent gastroscopy, and four gastric biopsies (three from the antrum and one from the corpus) were obtained. One of the antral biopsies was utilized for a rapid urease test (RUT), and three others were evaluated under microscopic examination. Sera from all patients were investigated for the presence of H. pylori IgG antibodies. The ¹⁴C-UBT was performed on all subjects using Heliprobe kit, and results were analyzed against the following gold standard (GS): H. pylori infection considered positive when any two of three diagnostic methods (histopathology, RUT, serology) are positive. Results. According to data analysis, the Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT had 94% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 93% negative predictive value (NPV), 100% positive predictive value (PPV), and 97% accuracy, compared with GS. Conclusion. The Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT is an easy-to-perform, rapid-response, and accurate test for H. pylori diagnosis, suitable for office use.

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a spiral shaped microaerophilic gram-negative bacterium that resides in the gastric epithelial mucosa and induces an inflammatory response leading to gastritis and peptic ulcer disease [1, 2]. It has been implicated as playing a role in gastrointestinal malignancies, especially gastric adenocarcinoma and MALToma until the latter could be treated with H. pylori eradication [3, 4].

H. pylori has a worldwide prevalence rate of about 50%, with a higher prevalence in developing countries [5, 6]. According to population-based studies, it has been shown that the H. pylori infection rate is very high in the Iranian population [7].

H. pylori detection can be made with diverse diagnostic tests, which are technically divided into invasive and noninvasive based on whether endoscopy is required or not. Invasive tests offer the possibility of obtaining tissue samples, which can be used for a rapid urease test (RUT), culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and histopathologic evaluation. Noninvasive tests include serum H. pylori IgG antibody titer, the urea breath test (UBT), and H. pylori stool antigen assay. Compared to noninvasive diagnostic modes, however, invasive techniques are inconvenient for patients and also have higher cost [8].

A UBT diagnostic test is based on the fact that swallowed “labeled carbon-containing urea” is broken down to ammonia and carbon dioxide (CO₂) by the urease-producing microorganism (H. pylori) in the gastric mucosa, and, finally, tagged carbon within the liberated CO₂ is detected in exhaled breath samples [9, 10].

Between two carbon isotopes (¹³C and ¹⁴C), which are used for the UBT, the ¹³C isotope has the difficulty of requiring more complex equipment, such as a mass spectrophotometer and administration of a pretest meal such as citric acid. However, when the ¹⁴C isotope is utilized, the required equipment is only a portable compact beta-scintillation counter, which offers the convenience of performing the test in the office. Although the ¹⁴C isotope is radioactive, microdose (1 μCi) ¹⁴C has the minimal radiation of one day background exposure [11].

We encountered repeatedly, dyspeptic patients, in our clinical practice, whose UBT results were not consistent with histopathology about H. pylori infection; based on Helicobacter genetic polymorphisms and differences between H. pylori strains in different countries, and since clinical validation of Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT has not yet been investigated in an Iranian population, we conducted a prospective study to compare Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT performance against diagnostic gold standards [12–14].

2. Materials and Methods

We studied 125 consecutive patients with dyspepsia that had been referred for upper GI endoscopy. We defined dyspepsia, based on the Rome III criteria, as having one or more of the following conditions: postprandial fullness (termed postprandial distress syndrome), early satiation (inability to finish a normal-sized meal or postprandial fullness), and epigastric pain or burning (termed epigastric pain syndrome) [15].

We considered subjects aged 15 y–75 y. We excluded patients who had been using proton pump inhibitors, H2 blockers, or any antibiotics within four previous weeks of the endoscopic evaluation. Pregnant women, patients who had a history of H. pylori eradication, and those with any severe cardiopulmonary disorders or debilitating or life-threatening conditions were excluded as well. Study personnel were blinded as to patient test results. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, and written informed consents were obtained from each participant.

After an overnight fast, patients underwent gastroscopy with a FUJINON endoscope, and four separate gastric biopsies were taken, three from the antrum and one from the corpus. One of the antral samples was used for a rapid urease test (RUT), and two antral samples plus the corpus biopsy sample were used for histopathologic examination.

To perform the RUT, we utilized a home-made liquid rapid urease kit (Gastric Urease, Bahar Afshan Co., Iran). We put tissue samples in a yellow-colored reagent liquid, and results were read after 30 min, 60 min, and finally after 24 hours. Liquid color changes into deep red, purple, or violet indicated a positive result. Negative results were indicated by no color change. Tissue samples were prepared with standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Giemsa stainings for histopathologic investigation. The histopathology exam result was considered positive when H. pylori was detected in either of the stains and negative when the organism was not detected in any.

One blood sample was obtained from each patient to be examined for anti H. pylori IgG titer. We utilized the ELIZA method (LDN, Nordhorn, Germany), and sera with titers that were >11 international units (IU) were considered positive (test cut-off point: 10 IU, <9 IU: negative, 9–11 IU: doubtful, >11 IU: positive); we regarded doubtful results as negative.

After gastroscopy, we performed Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT tests. In order to carry out the UBT, after an overnight fast, the patient swallowed a ¹⁴C-labeled urea-containing capsule (Helicap, Institute of Isotopes, Budapest, Hungary) with water. The overall activity of these capsules is as small as 1 μCi (37 KBq). After 15 minutes, the patient breathed out into a dry cartridge (Heliprobe breath card, Kibion AB, Uppsala, Sweden) through its mouthpiece until the color of the card indicator changed from orange to yellow, which took about 1 min to 2 min. Thereafter, the breath card was inserted into a small desktop Geiger Müller counter (Heliprobe Analyser, Kibion AB, Uppsala, Sweden), and the radioactivity of the breath samples was read after 250 seconds of an automated process. Finally, the test results were expressed on the LCD of the analyzer in a numeric fashion (0: patient not infected, 1: borderline result, 2: patient infected), which corresponded to radioactivity as count per minute (CPM): <25 CPM: patient not infected, 25–50 CPM: borderline result, >50 CPM: patient infected. We considered grades 0 and 1 as negative results in our study, and only samples with activities that were more than 50 CPM (expressed as no. 2 on the counter LCD) were regarded as positive.

Descriptive analysis was done for demographic features. Gold standard for H. pylori positivity was defined as “positive results for any two of three diagnostic methods (histopathology, RUT, serology).” Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV), and the accuracy of the UBT were computed against our GS; for categorical variables, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated.

3. Results

We enrolled 125 consecutive patients in our study according to the above mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria; 65 (52%) were females, and 60 (48%) were males. Patient ages ranged from 18 y to 66 y with a mean of y.

As a result of histopathologic evaluation of tissue specimens, 69 (55.2%) patients were found to be infected with H. pylori, and 56 (44.8%) were not infected. Serologic examination of patient sera samples for IgG antibody against H. pylori showed 87 (69.6%) positive results, while the remaining 38 (30.4%) were seronegative. The RUT results were positive in 63 (50.4%) patients and negative in 62 (49.2%) patients. H. pylori infection was found in 67 (53.6%) subjects by the ¹⁴C urea breath test (¹⁴C-UBT), and 58 (46.4%) subjects were negative.

All four tests were positive or negative in 57 (45.6%) and 34 (27.2%) patients, respectively. Only 2 patients had no histopathologic evidence of H. pylori infection, whilst their RUT and serology results were positive. (Incidentally these two patients also had positive UBTs.); We think that this might be the result of errors during sampling or histopathologic examination. 20 patients showed solitary positive serology tests which indicated recent past infection. Table 1 shows other discordances between our test results.

Compared to our GS, the UBT could correctly detect 67 of 71 H. pylori infected subjects with 94% sensitivity (95% CI: 85–98%) and 100% positive predictive value (PPV; 95% CI: 93–100%). The UBT also excluded correctly all 54 uninfected patients with 100% specificity (95% CI: 92–100%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 93% (95% CI: 82–98%). The UBT showed 97% accuracy (Table 2).

4. Discussion

H. pylori has a high prevalence rate in developing countries, such as Iran. According to data reported by Derakhshan et al., H. pylori must be considered a risk factor for noncardiac gastric adenocarcinoma in Iranian patient [16]. Eradication of H. pylori could lower the incidence rate of gastric cancer [17]. A more precise diagnosis of H. pylori, allowing an earlier eradicating treatment, may play a crucial role in cancer prevention strategies. Currently, there is an increasing need for an easy-to-perform, accurate, and readily available diagnostic technique in H. pylori prevalent populations. Considering economic concerns and the availability of tests in developing countries, as well as testing possibilities in medical clinics, we recommend use of the Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT over other noninvasive and invasive tests.

Based on the data that suggest that the combination of tests increases their overall diagnostic power, we combined H. pylori serologic assessment and the RUT with histopathology in order to account for the possibility of very few false negative results from microscopic examination (which were seen in two cases in our study) [18]. We discovered that the ¹⁴C-UBT has 94% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, 93% NPV, and 97% accuracy, compared with GS. These findings are compatible with Jonaitis et al.’s study results, with their defined H. pylori positive gold standard as “at least one positive test of RUT or histopathology”. They found that Heliprobe had 92% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, 84% NPV, and 94% accuracy [19]. Our results are also in accordance with Ozdemir et al.’s results for Heliprobe performance (96.6% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 93.7% PPV, 100% NPV, and 97.7% accuracy), although their H. pylori positive gold standard was defined as “positivity of any two of the three following tests (RUT, PCR, and histopathology)” [20].

In Rasool et al.’s study regarding histopathology alone as GS, Heliprobe sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy were 92%, 93%, 84%, 97%, and 93%, respectively, which were consistent with our results although the studies’ gold standards are slightly different [21]. In another study, conducted by Öztürk et al. that is again regarding only histopathology as GS, Heliprobe had higher sensitivity (100%), but its specificity (76%) was lower than that of our study [22].

People who undergo medical diagnostic tests using radioisotopes are often worried about radiation exposure. The half life of the ¹⁴C isotope is about 5000 years, but, with regards to the short biologic half life of urea, more than two-thirds of the tagged urea will be excreted in the urine within the following three days of the test; moreover, the total dose of the ¹⁴C used in the test is very low, and activity of this quantity of isotope was evaluated as 1 μCi. Accordingly, based on the published data, about 800 breath testing episodes must be carried out for one person to receive an effective dose equivalent to the amount that an average person absorbs from natural sources in one year [23]. Considering the few times a person needs to be tested with the ¹⁴C-UBT, the lifelong cumulative radiation of the test is negligible. Even in conditions of repeated UBT testing, radiation exposure risk is very low. Previously, ¹⁴C-UBT was not used in children because of the concerns about the radiation hazards; however, diverse studies have established its safety in pediatric patients [11, 24]. Although no experimental study has yet been done to assess ¹⁴C-UBT safety in pregnancy, Bentur et al. have claimed that, in view of the insignificant ¹⁴C radioactivity, fetal radiation exposure is extremely lower than teratogenic thresholds [25].

One of the advantages of the Heliprobe system is that it can be used in a clinical setting, allowing the preparation of test results on-site in less than one hour. The portable beta-scintillation counter that is used in this test could simply be placed on a desktop; however, the ¹³C-UBT needs a sophisticated mass spectrophotometer to read the results. Of course, ¹³C-UBT has some advantages over ¹⁴C-UBT such that the former utilizes a nonradioactive isotope that makes it suitable to use in pregnant women and children. Although some studies, as mentioned earlier, have already emphasized on ¹⁴C-UBT safety in children, ¹³C-UBT is still the preferred method in them. Considering ¹³C safety, it is also a better isotope than ¹⁴C for epidemiologic studies, as some studies used it to investigate H. pylori routes of transmission in preschool age [26, 27].

Stool antigen is another sensitive and specific noninvasive diagnostic test for H. pylori [28]. Although it is competitive with the ¹⁴C-UBT in terms of accuracy, but it is not appropriate for office use because it is a time consuming exam regarding sampling limitations and off-site test interpretation.

Conclusively, compared to invasive gold standards, the Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT is an accurate, sensitive, and specific test for H. pylori diagnosis. The main advantages of the Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT are its rapidity and patient convenience. Furthermore, in view of the very low radioactivity of the Heliprobe ¹⁴C-UBT and its portability, this test seems to be a more suitable option for office use than a nonradioactive, complex and off-site ¹³C-UBT as well as other invasive diagnostic modalities.

Conflict of Interests

There are no potential conflict of interests that any of the authors have identified relevant to this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center (GLDRC) of Guilan University of Medical Sciences and Beta Medical Engineering Co., which supported this work in part (http://www.betamedgroup.com/), especially Mr. Ali Rafat-Zand for financial support for this work.

References

C. S. Goodwin and B. W. Worsley, “Microbiology of Helicobacter pylori,” Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
G. V. Papatheodoridis, S. Sougioultzis, and A. J. Archimandritis, “Effects of Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on peptic ulcer disease: a systematic review,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 130–142, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Q. Huang, S. Sridhar, Y. Chen, and R. H. Hunt, “Meta-analysis of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori seropositivity and gastric cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 1169–1179, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Papa, G. Cammarota, A. Tursi, A. Gasbarrini, and G. Gasbarrini, “Helicobacter pylori eradication and remission of low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: a long-term follow-up study,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 169–171, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Pounder and D. Ng, “The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in different countries,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 9, supplement 2, pp. 33–39, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
N. R. Hussein, “Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer in the Middle East: a new enigma?” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 26, pp. 3226–3234, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Malekzadeh, M. H. Derakhshan, and Z. Malekzadeh, “Gastric cancer in Iran: epidemiology and risk factors,” Archives of Iranian Medicine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 576–583, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Vakil, D. Rhew, A. Soll, and J. J. Ofman, “The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies for Helicobacter pylori,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 1691–1698, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. D. Chey, “Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. 14C-urea breath test,” Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 895–902, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Öztürk, “Diagnostic methods of Helicobacter pylori infection,” Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 60–64, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Leide-Svegborn, K. Stenström, M. Olofsson et al., “Biokinetics and radiation doses for carbon-14 urea in adults and children undergoing the Helicobacter pylori breath test,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 573–580, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chung, A. Olivares, E. Torres, O. Yilmaz, H. Cohen, and G. Perez-Perez, “Diversity of VacA intermediate region among Helicobacter pylori strains from several regions of the world,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 690–696, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Douraghi, Y. Talebkhan, H. Zeraati et al., “Multiple gene Sstatus in helicobacter pylori strains and risk of gastric cancer development,” Digestion, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 200–207, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Talebkhan, M. Mohammadi, M. A. Mohagheghi et al., “CagA gene and protein status among Iranian Helicobacter pylori strains,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 925–932, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Tack, N. J. Talley, M. Camilleri et al., “Functional gastroduodenal disorders,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1466–1479, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Derakhshan, R. Malekzadeh, H. Watabe et al., “Combination of gastric atrophy, reflux symptoms and histological subtype indicates two distinct aetiologies of gastric cardia cancer,” Gut, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 298–305, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Fukase, M. Kato, S. Kikuchi et al., “Effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori on incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: an open-label, randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9636, pp. 392–397, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Thijs, A. A. van Zwet, W. J. Thijs et al., “Diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori: a prospective evaluation of their accuracy, without selecting a single test as the gold standard,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 2125–2129, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
L. V. Jonaitis, G. Kiudelis, and L. Kupcinskas, “Evaluation of a novel 14C-urea breath test “Heliprobe” in diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection,” Medicina, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 32–35, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Ozdemir, N. I. Karabacak, B. Degertekin et al., “Could the simplified (14)C urea breath test be a new standard in noninvasive diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection?” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 611–616, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rasool, S. Abid, and W. Jafri, “Validity and cost comparison of 14carbon urea breath test for diagnosis of H Pylori in dyspeptic patients,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 925–929, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Öztürk, Z. Yeşilova, S. Ilgan et al., “A new, practical, low-dose 14C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: clinical validation and comparison with the standard method,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1457–1462, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
J. B. Stubbs and B. J. Marshall, “Radiation dose estimates for the carbon-14-labeled urea breath test,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 821–825, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
C. M. Pathak, B. Kaur, and K. L. Khanduja, “14C-urea breath test is safe for pediatric patients,” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 830–835, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Bentur, D. Matsui, and G. Koren, “Safety of 14C-UBT for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in pregnancy,” Canadian Family Physician, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 479–480, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Brenner, D. Rothenbacher, G. Bode, and G. Adler, “Parental history of gastric or duodenal ulcer and prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in preschool children: population based study,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 316, no. 7132, p. 665, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Vandenplas, U. Blecker, T. Devreker et al., “Contribution of the 13C-urea breath test to the detection of Helicobacter pylori gastritis in children,” Pediatrics, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 608–611, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
J. P. Gisbert and J. M. Pajares, “Stool antigen test for the diagnosis of Helicobocter pylori infection: a systematic review,” Helicobacter, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 347–368, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3293

Downloads

1383

Citations